They say a picture is worth a thousand words. 

For historian and professor Martha Sandweiss, however, one particular image, taken 158 years ago at Fort Laramie, was worth 140,000 of them. She wrote an entire book about it, unraveling an untold narrative about a native girl on the plains. 

The photo in question depicts six white men, all members of the United State’s Indian Peace Commission, who had been dispatched west by Congress “to establish peace with certain hostile Indian tribes” — with a goal of moving tribes to reservations. 

They stand at Fort Laramie, a major frontier outpost in the Wyoming Territory, six severe figures flanking a small native girl wrapped in a blanket. 

At the time Sandweiss first laid eyes on the picture, which acclaimed Civil War-era photographer Alexander Gardner made using the wet plate collodion process, the identities of the six men were well known. But the girl?

She was nameless, Sandweiss explained during a recent presentation in Cheyenne. 

“And my project started with the simplest question: Could I figure out who she is?” said Sandweiss, professor emerita of history at Princeton University. Historians typically set out to explain things like events, she said, acknowledging that her approach was unorthodox. But it was ultimately fruitful. 

“I love digging deep for those little stories, and this photo turns out to have a lot of them,” she said. “I would eventually learn there’s an incredible span of American history here.”

A clue in the Fort Laramie archives led her to Pine Ridge, South Dakota, where she eventually tracked down descendents of the woman and learned that her name was Sophie Mousseau.

In the process, Sandweiss happened across stories of brutal massacres at the hands of U.S. officers, blended families with French Canadian bloodlines and personal betrayals. The timeline of events she studied began in 1800 and stretched until 1936, resulting in her latest book, “Girl in the Middle: A Recovered History of the American West.”

It provided further evidence, she said, that “everyone’s story matters. It’s not just the well-known military men who could illuminate the past for us. Sophie matters too. The Sophies of the world matter too.”

Katie Klingsporn reports on outdoor recreation, public lands, education and general news for WyoFile. She’s been a journalist and editor covering the American West for 20 years. Her freelance work has...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *