Share this:

This story is part of WyoFile’s collaborative legislative initiative — a coordinated effort by partner newsrooms to deliver comprehensive coverage of Wyoming’s 2025 general session.

CHEYENNE—Gov. Mark Gordon has signed a measure to provide a statewide, 25% property tax cut for Wyoming homeowners, but vetoed a bill to ban DEI programming at Wyoming’s institutions of higher education.

Gordon signed Senate File 69, “Homeowner property tax exemption,” on Tuesday. His office said in a news release that the legislation will “provide permanent property tax relief to Wyoming homeowners.”

The same release announced that Gordon vetoed Senate File 103, “Terminating and defunding diversity, equity and inclusion,” a bill sponsored by Sen. Cheri Steinmetz, R-Torrington. That bill prohibited DEI efforts and mandates by state agencies and public educational institutions.

Property tax bill

SF 69 went through many iterations over the course of the 68th Wyoming Legislature’s general session, which is set to end Thursday. More than once, lawmakers amended the bill to offer a 50% property tax cut, and even tried to include a calculation of relief based on a five-year, county-by-county average increase.

SF 69 provides a 25% property tax exemption on the first $1 million of a single-family home’s fair market value and does not have a sunset date. The exemption takes effect immediately, with an owner-occupied requirement beginning in the second year.

“I have always supported tax accountability, and this bill provides tax relief without transferring the burden to our core energy industry,” Gordon said in the release. “This act, coupled with the bills I signed last year, responds to the call for property tax relief. Now the practical impacts of this legislation will need to be navigated by our cities, counties, special districts and citizens.”

In a second joint conference committee meeting last Thursday, Rep. Scott Heiner, R-Green River, asked that the Senate agree to provide backfill for local governments in the bill, as was the House’s preference. Senate Vice President Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, said the Senate could not agree to a deal on SF 69 that included backfill with a cut of only 25%.

A real estate company lists this Jackson house and lot for $2.7 million. The property, which could be redeveloped with several units, had property taxes in 2024 amounting to $9,951. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

Even as late as Tuesday afternoon, representatives in the House tried to add backfill amendments to other property tax measures. Several attempts were made to Senate File 153, “Residential real property-taxable value,” which would create a separate property tax assessment rates for residential real property.

“I think we should continue to stand for our position. It shouldn’t be about what the other body is going to do, or what the guy downstairs is going to do,” Rep. J.T. Larson, R-Rock Springs, said on the House floor. “We have to do what’s right for our constituents.”

All amendments to add backfill to SF 153 failed.

Terminating DEI bill

Falling back on an argument about local control, Gordon said in his veto letter on SF 103 that Wyoming has “long upheld principles of responsible governance, educational excellence, and local control.”

Gordon said that while he appreciated the Legislature’s “efforts to address concerns related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies within public institutions,” he had significant reservations with the bill in its current form. The bill, according to Gordon, “introduces ill-defined and overly broad restrictions, creates significant legal ambiguities, and risks unintended consequences that could negatively impact Wyoming’s higher education institutions and workforce development.”

The bill also included a late-stage amendment that was added on after the Legislature failed to agree upon a supplemental budget bill. Steinmetz initially recommended that the Senate not concur with the House amendment to SF 103 to include $550,000 to fund medical education for Wyoming students under an agreement with the University of Utah, but the Senate receded from nonconcurrence and sent the bill to the governor with the amendment.

Sen. Cheri Steinmetz of Torrington, pictured in January 2025. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Gordon said while he fully supports “training the future physicians Wyoming needs,” the funding “may be a more proper discussion for the Legislature to take up this fall in anticipation of the upcoming Budget Session.”

Other bills, he said, also address the same concerns regarding DEI activities in public institutions, including House Enrolled Act 67, which defines prohibited practices, ensuring consistency and reducing the risk of legal confusion.

Carrie Haderlie is a freelance journalist who covers southeast Wyoming from her home near Saratoga. She has written for the Wyoming Tribune Eagle, Laramie Boomerang, Wyoming Business Report and several...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Thank you for the comprehensive coverage of Governor Gordon’s recent legislative actions. The $25 million property tax cut for homeowners is a significant move. I’m curious about the long-term implications of this tax relief:

    Fiscal Impact: How might this reduction affect Wyoming’s budget allocations for essential services like education and infrastructure?

    Equity Considerations: Are there measures in place to ensure that this tax cut benefits low-income homeowners proportionally, or could it inadvertently favor higher-income property owners?

    Additionally, regarding the veto of the anti-DEI bill, it’s notable that the governor emphasized the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. In the context of Wyoming’s commitment to fostering inclusive communities, how does this decision align with broader state policies and goals?

    I appreciate the balanced reporting and look forward to further insights on these developments.