Lumps of coal. (Utah Bureau of Land Management)
Share this:

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management issued a “record of decision” Thursday, greenlighting the sale of 441 million tons of coal in the Powder River Basin in northeast Wyoming — the first major federal coal lease offering in the region in a decade.

The West Antelope III coal lease will go to competitive auction on Oct. 8, the agency said. 

Though the 3,508-acre tract contains approximately 441 million tons of coal, the estimated “recoverable” volume is about 365 million tons, according to the BLM. “The recoverable coal volume and duration of leased reserves is driven by economics and subject to change,” the agency said.

The tract is associated with Navajo Transitional Energy Company’s Antelope mine and spans areas of Campbell and Converse counties. Navajo Transitional’s predecessor, Cloud Peak Energy, nominated the tract in 2015, kicking off the BLM’s review process. But federal action on the request went idle when Cloud Peak filed for bankruptcy in 2019. The company eventually sold its Powder River Basin mines to Navajo Transitional. The BLM revived the lease sale approval process just days after the One Big Beautiful Bill was signed in July. 

A truck hauls coal at Peabody Energy’s North Antelope Rochelle Mine in Wyoming. (Peabody Energy)

“This coal leasing effort directly supports the Trump administration’s goals of reinvigorating the American coal industry, reducing reliance on foreign energy, and creating good-paying jobs in rural communities,” the agency said in a press release. “It also aligns with Secretary [Doug] Burgum’s vision of unleashing domestic energy production while streamlining federal processes and ensuring long-term economic growth.”

The West Antelope III coal lease, along with 14.5 million tons of extra coal reserves included in a pending modification plan for the Antelope mine, would add about 18 years to the life of the mine, according to BLM estimates. The Antelope mine extracts 20-25 million tons annually and employs about 400 workers, according to the company. It’s the third-largest coal mine in the nation in terms of production, federal records show.

The size of the coal lease, as well as the Trump administration’s expedited timeline to put it up for auction, is cause for concern, according to the Sheridan-based Powder River Basin Resource Council, which formed in the 1970s, in part, to watchdog the industry.

“Where’s the market for this lease, and does the lease make sense in the current market?” Resource Council Executive Director Donna Birkholz wants to know.

Though the Powder River Basin coal industry has benefited from a slowdown in coal-burning electric power plant retirements, it’s a long way from recovering from a steep market slide that began 15 years ago, cutting the mining district’s annual production by nearly half.

Lingering uncertainty about the industry’s future underscores concerns about potential environmental impacts if coal companies are unable to make good on reclamation requirements, Birkholz added.

The Resource Council, along with other conservation groups, has also noted that recent cuts to coal royalty rates — by both Wyoming and the federal government — will result in lower revenues to state and federal coffers compared to past coal leases.

Visit this BLM website to learn more about the West Antelope III coal lease.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 26 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy industry in...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. It might be helpful if you added the name of the organization that you represent and your position with that organization so as to clearly expose your biases in this matter.

    Further, rather than to question the value of the potential sale, one might give consideration to the positives of a sale which the dims might have prevented by tabling the and any prior sale in favor of the value of any sale of a resource which might have continued to lie dormant into perpetuity.

  2. Can’t wait to see the fire sale price this “competitive” coal lease will generate for all of us as owners of this coal. But, oh wait, maybe there will be a surcharge now that this coal has been deemed to be “clean, beautiful, coal.” I didn’t see it listed on the BLM’s statement about the lease but that’s got to be worth at least double, right? Sheesh. With the climate at risk, taxpayers getting a bad deal, and the only beneficiaries being the coal companies, this makes absolutely no sense (and really coal leasing has never been a good deal for the American public: https://www.opb.org/news/article/government-report-coal-companies-are-pocketing-mil/) I’m glad Wyoming schools will get a bit of money from this over the 5 year period the lease is paid off (interest free btw) but enjoy it while it last because it might be the last ever Powder River Basin coal lease.