This commentary was originally published by National Catholic Reporter.
In the bruising backlash over his defense of conservative commentator Tucker Carlson’s interview with notorious white Christian nationalist Nick Fuentes, Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts faces similar accusations to those that plagued his two greatest political heroes.
Analysis
Moreover, as a prominent critic of “cancel culture,” a leading Catholic traditionalist and a shepherd of the controversial Project 2025 government reorganization plan, Roberts finds himself threatened with cancellation.
Roberts, 51, is the former president of tiny Wyoming Catholic College who vaulted into his $926,000-a-year position atop Heritage in 2021 after a four-year stint at the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation.
Roberts describes himself as a “devotee” of Russell Kirk, who died in 1994.
Kirk, who authored the canonical 1953 book The Conservative Mind, and Pat Buchanan, conservative political pundit and perennial presidential candidate, were repeatedly branded — many say unfairly — as antisemites, mainly for their shared belief that Israel had too much influence over American foreign policy.
Roberts has described The Conservative Mind as “the most important book about conservatism ever written.”
Buchanan, who retired from public life in 2023 and is now 87 years old, has long been Roberts’ political idol and guiding star. As a college freshman in his native Lafayette, Louisiana, Roberts organized a rally for Buchanan’s 1992 primary campaign against eventual nominee George H.W. Bush. Roberts also attended the Republican convention in the Houston Astrodome, where Buchanan delivered his famous “culture war” speech.
Both Kirk, considered a father of the so-called “paleoconservative” movement, and Buchanan, a former advisor to Presidents Reagan, Nixon and Ford, faced accusations of antisemitism over statements about Israel and its purported outsized influence on American policy.
Kirk said in a 1988 Heritage Foundation lecture: “Not seldom it has seemed as if some eminent neoconservatives mistook Tel Aviv for the capital of the United States.” Midge Decter, Jewish director of the Committee for the Free World and wife of neoconservative mainstay Norman Podhoretz, attacked Kirk’s comments as “a bloody outrage, a piece of anti-Semitism.” Kirk also opposed the first Gulf War in 1990, calling it a “war for an oil can.”
Buchanan, who grew up in a family steeped in the isolationist, antisemitic rhetoric of Catholic radio broadcaster Father Charles Coughlin and famed aviator Charles Lindbergh, also used similar language in his opposition to the Gulf War. On a 1990 television broadcast of “The McLaughlin Group”, Buchanan declared, “Capitol Hill is Israeli-occupied territory.” Later that year, on the same show, Buchanan said, “there are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the Middle East — the Israeli defense ministry and its ‘amen corner’ in the United States.”
Buchanan’s comments inspired the wrath of the late New York Times editor and columnist Abe Rosenthal, and prompted a 40,000-word article examining conservatives’ antisemitism by William F. Buckley Jr. in his National Review magazine. Comments by Rosenthal and others, including Holocaust survivor and author Eli Weisel, were scathing. Buckley was more forgiving. Buckley concluded: “If you ask, do I think Pat Buchanan is an antisemite, my answer is, he is not one. But I think he’s said some antisemitic things.”
Unlike Kirk and Buchanan, Kevin Roberts has publicly condemned antisemitism on several occasions. Under his leadership, Heritage unveiled “Project Esther” in 2024 to combat antisemitism.
But as a result of his comments defending Tucker Carlson after Carlson hosted white Christian nationalist Nick Fuentes, Roberts found himself in a similar pickle as his ideological role models, but with far greater potential consequences.
In a video statement, Roberts characterized criticism of Carlson as “slander” by a “venomous coalition” and said the outspoken former Fox News star will always remain “a close friend of The Heritage Foundation.” Roberts said that while he “abhors” some things that Nick Fuentes has said, “cancelling him is not the answer either.”
But the most damaging part of his defense may have been his comment that “Christians are entitled to critique the State of Israel without being labeled as antisemitic.” Later, he added, “…conservatives should not be compelled to automatically support any foreign government, regardless of the pressure from the globalist elite or their representatives in Washington.” The term “globalist elite” is sometimes interpreted as an antisemitic trope.
Most of the immediate backlash focused on Fuentes and his well-established racist and antisemitic stances. The lead editorial in the Nov. 2 Wall Street Journal began “An old political poison is growing on the new right, led by podcasters and internet opportunists who are preoccupied with the Jews. It is spreading wider and faster than we thought and it has even found an apologist in Kevin Roberts, president of the venerable Heritage Foundation.”
But the editorial also focused on Roberts’ distinction between criticism of Israel and antisemitism. “This is what Hamas supporters on the left say: What do you mean? We were only criticizing Israel. Not exactly.” The editors even borrowed a line from William Buckley’s takedown of Pat Buchanan, calling Roberts “a pyromaniac in a field of straw men.”
But while Kirk and Buchanan suffered few consequences for their controversial statements, interpreted by many as antisemitic, Roberts’ future at Heritage seems endangered. In the wake of the dust-up, several staffers resigned or moved to other positions. Roberts issued another statement strongly condemning Fuentes.
Earlier this month, Roberts apologized before an all-staff meeting at Heritage headquarters in Washington. His contrite comments were leaked to the Jewish News Syndicate and Washington Free Beacon.
“I made a mistake, and I let you down and I let this down this institution. Period. Full stop,” Roberts told the staffers, according to the Jewish News and Free Beacon reports. He said the comments were written by his former chief of staff, Ryan Neuhaus, who was subsequently removed from the position. But Roberts said it was his fault for not sufficiently reviewing the material before making his comments, released as a video on X.
“I didn’t know much about this Fuentes guy. I still don’t, which underscores the mistake.”
He specifically apologized to Jewish staff members for using the term “venomous coalition” — an antisemitic trope — in his comments defending Carlson.
“And I very sincerely — very, very sincerely — apologize to you in particular, and to all of you for using that. It was not my intention to use a trope. I should have been better.”
Rone Tempest wrote a 2024 profile of Kevin Roberts for WyoFile. Read it here.


From Project Ester
“The victim status of the oppressed, in this view, grants them license to pursue any course of action. Jews, Israelis, and all proud Americans in this case have been cast in the role of the implacable oppressors and the Palestinians, Arab or Muslim, in the role of their victims. While this understanding of history comes straight from the pages of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto,……”
Kevin shows his hand by ignoring the Protestant Niemoller’s words
First they came for the Communists….
What I will continue to believe is that humanity’s worst invention was the Abrahamic Religions as these believers will justify any action in the name of a non-existent entity, but I will say it does pay good money to hate the other as Kevin so inelegantly demonstrates.
Greg, religions aren’t the problem, they are merely used from time to time as an excuse for man’s inhumanity to man.
Jesus Christ, and his message was not an “invention” of man and he did exist.
“from time to time” – All the time….
I am certain the words of Jesus were real and his ideas “radical” but as far as his rising from the dead and then coming back at some time, not a chance Chad. Even Michelangelo, the greatest and most accurate troll of all time, knew that God was an invention of man as he painted the subject onto the hemisphere of a human brain on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.
Jesus is just another accurate philosopher discussing the human condition; however, those professing that they understand his teachings are also mistaken. For instance those claiming that Jesus said to pay one’s taxes is up for debate as I would posit he said for all to give up all of your money as all had Caesars face on it. There is no greater threat to our world, freedoms and liberties than from those claiming to know the mind of god or jesus or the holy ghost….I thought it was monotheism, but discussing religion with the believers is a lost cause because they have faith, not facts.
No Greg, not all the time, and certainly not by all that claim to be Christians.
Man’s inhumanity to man in the 20th Century found a new “god” to obey. The State. Mao, Stalin, Etc. forbid religion and committed acts as bad as any Religious zealot you can name from the Crusades/Inquisition/etc. Christians and any other religion didnt rack up the bodycount Statism did in the 20th century. Government and the belief/faith that IT has ultimate authority over free human beings has taken the mantle as the “greater threat to our world, freedoms and liberties”.
Your statements on non belief carry as much weight as others professions of faith. You have no more knowledge of this, than anyone else. “not a chance” is in no way a “fact”, it’s simply your opinion and nothing more.
That’s the facts.
100%
Missives on this topic seldom make the crucial distinctions . Namely , the acute differences between being Jewish , Israeli , or Zionist. It is possible to reside in Israel and be None of those things, or One, Two, or all Three of those things. Same same if outside israel proper. Context is everything.
Failure to recognize that triad and/or accept it seems to be at the core of the fervent discourses.
Simply put, Roberts should resign. He belongs back in the shadows–preferably not in Wyoming.
The Guardian this morning has a long assessment on the ongoing Republican civil war between the conservative old guard of Buckley and Reagan and the modern Fuentes-aligned fascist rage machine. Roberts figures in that assessment. Well worth reading.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/nov/20/nick-fuentes-tucker-carlson
As a professional soldier, I take the fascist rage machine seriously. From the neo-Nazis, the neo white supremacist KKK, and the Catholic Integralists, not to mention deranged others who are hard to define and pigeon-hole, to the advanced tech ideologues from Silicon Valley who seek to make themselves cyborgs and the rest of us disposable peasants, we are in for a hell of a time in the coming decades. Match that up with the coming rigors of climate change; I use the word “hell” literally.
It’s time that we think through the consequences of what’s happening around us and make plans to deal with those consequences. One plan that is not an option is getting back to the pre-Trump status quo. Those days are gone.
Embrace the suck.
This country has slipped into the trash can, and its cause is people like Roberts, Buchanan, Trump.
There are two sides to a coin.
But only one side is right. This guy is a real creep.
Because he offered criticism?
Because of his opinions. Basically a misogynist christian nationalist that thinks he should be able to control peoples lives.
Freedom of speech seems to be hanging by a thread when people can no longer criticize another country for horrific acts against human beings.
When criticism for another country is so easily twisted by supporters of that country into something many never said.
Anti-Israel war crimes/Anti-Zionist is NOT Anti-Semitism. FACT!
Many Jews have the exact same criticisms of Israel made by others called “antisemitic”, what should they be labeled?