U.S. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo) speaks during a June 2, 2021 press conference. (Michael Cummo/Wyoming Tribune Eagle/Wyoming News Exchange)
Share this:

U.S. senators voted down dueling health insurance measures Thursday, including a Democratic proposal to extend Obamacare tax subsidies. That failure all but ensures costs will spike for millions of Americans — including thousands of Wyoming customers who will experience the highest increases in the country. 

Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, the Senate Majority Whip and a retired doctor, has emerged as a spokesperson for the Republicans’ measure and a major foe of the Democratic proposal. He skewered Obamacare as a failure and said the government cannot keep spending money to prop up the unsustainable program. 

“What [the Democrats] are proposing isn’t a serious plan,” Barrasso said on the U.S. Senate floor. “It’s a disaster. Our nation can’t afford it. The American people can’t afford to pay these high costs for health care. We need to focus on the cost of care.”

Wyoming’s other senator, Republican Cynthia Lummis, also voted against subsidy extensions. 

Consumers and health care advocates have been working for months to try to avoid the year-end subsidy expiration. But with signs pointing to their likely end, many have been bracing for the cost increases and scrambling to figure out if they can afford them. 

In Wyoming, a 60-year-old person earning roughly $63,000 is facing a 421% increase in average monthly premium costs on the ACA marketplace, according to reporting by KFF, a nonprofit that writes about health care. No other state equals or tops that percentage. The same individual would face increases of 231%, 166%, 192% and 134% if he or she lived in Montana, Colorado, Utah and Idaho, respectively.

Lander Free Clinic staffers Audrey Zanetti and Stephanie Kohm go over volunteer schedules on Nov. 19, 2025. The clinic became a Certified Application Counselor Designated Organization this year to help patients navigate the Affordable Care Act marketplace. (Katie Klingsporn/WyoFile)

Not all of the 45,000 ACA customers in Wyoming will experience such dramatic rises; costs depend on factors like age and annual income. But health care advocates worry that sticker shock will cause consumers to either find private plans with cheap price tags but lousy coverage or abandon insurance altogether. That could raise costs for hospitals tasked with providing uncompensated care and even for those with insurance.

How we got here

The Affordable Care Act marketplace, created in 2010, is available to people who don’t qualify for Medicaid and don’t have insurance through an employer. 

In 2020, Congress created the Enhanced Premium Tax Credit during the COVID-19 pandemic to make marketplace insurance more affordable. That program provided subsidies that drastically reduced premium costs. For some low-income customers, monthly premiums went to $0.  

The program helped contribute to an all-time low in America’s uninsured rate, health advocates say. But the tax credits were not cheap — and fiscal conservatives argued they were unsustainable. Congress extended the credits in 2022, but did not extend them again this year. A deadlock over the tax credits played a significant role in this fall’s historic government shutdown. 

Expansion would result in a $212 billion deficit on government spending over 10 years, according to a 2020 estimate from the Congressional Budget Office.

On Nov. 12, Congress struck a deal to reopen the government that did not include an extension. But both Democrats and Republicans vowed to continue working on bills to address expiring ACA subsidies, leading to Thursday’s votes. The Democrats’ measure would have extended the subsidies, while Republicans proposed shifting funds to Health Savings Accounts, or HSAs. 

What they are saying 

Senators echoed many of the arguments that have shaped the debate, with Republicans arguing the subsidies were a one-time attempt to fix the broken system of Obamacare, and Democrats arguing the subsidies are necessary to make health care affordable and save lives. 

“This is not a political fight,” said Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York. “This is not a symbolic vote. This is a life and death vote, because people who will lose their health care could face that horrible, horrible end.”

Schumer also stressed that while Democrats were unanimous in their support, Republicans had fractured. 

This graph from KFF Health News shows average monthly premium cost increases of Affordable Care Act health insurance plans for a 60-year-old individual earning roughly $63,000 a year. With a jump of 421%, Wyoming has the largest increase. (KFF Health News)

“Democrats are fighting to lower the health care costs for the American people, while Republicans are fighting among themselves,” he said. “By my last count, Republicans are now at nine different health care proposals and counting, and none of them give the American people the one thing they most want — a clean, simple extension of these health care tax credits.”

Barrasso, meanwhile, asserted that Obamacare “robbed the American people of choice as well as affordability,” and Democrats were attempting to use taxpayer dollars to hide the fraud-ridden program’s failures. He also noted that when the subsidies were created in 2021, Democrats characterized them as “temporary, emergency measures because of COVID.

“Now these tax-and-spend radicals who run the Democratic Party want to extend them again, these bonus payments, for another three years,” he said. “And they want to do it with zero reforms.”  

What next?

Wyoming’s health costs have seen additional inflationary pressures this year. In addition to baseline insurance plan cost increases, Mountain Health Co-op stopped offering health plans in Wyoming. That means the state is down to just two providers.

The deadline to enroll in an ACA marketplace plan starting Jan. 1 is Dec. 15. If customers enroll between Dec. 15 and the closing date of Jan. 15, coverage will start Feb. 1. 

Those who do not want to continue ACA policies need to be careful they don’t let them auto-renew, health insurance navigators say. And for people exploring private insurance, experts recommend calling insurance companies directly, fully understanding plan provisions before purchasing and being careful with online plans that look too good to be true.

Katie Klingsporn reports on outdoor recreation, public lands, education and general news for WyoFile. She’s been a journalist and editor covering the American West for 20 years. Her freelance work has...

Join the Conversation

72 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The second paragraph identifies Barrasso as a retired doctor. Does this mean he is no longer bound by the Hippocratic Oath to Do No Harm? Obviously so. For the most part, I’ve always thought Do No Harm were pretty good words to live by, i.e. short and to the point, with some exceptions of course.

  2. Our senators did what is right for the country and Wyoming. We need to figure out something that works. We were sending 100’s of Billions of taxpayers monies to fund insurance companies. This had to stop. Let’s see the Dems work with the GOP and come up with something that will work. The Part time subsidy for covid was suppose to end. It was just shoring a failed Obama Care act that did not work. It was never affordable.

  3. The expiring subsidies were meant as a temporary Covid relief mechanism.

    If Owe-scam-a-care is so good; why does it need subsidies in the first place?

    1. The main point of the ACA is to prevent insurance companies from rejecting people with pre-existing conditions. The subsidies offset the losses the companies might take by insuring these less healthy people.
      Hey, any idea when the Republicans will unveil their health care program? It’s been over twelve years now.

      1. The main point of Owe-scam-a-care was to grow the the government. Before Owe-scam-a-care; we already had Medicare, Medicaid, and the VA for vets. For all I know there may be other programs in the woodwork. Yet, we got another bloated mess on top of existing bloated messes. Consider this; the bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

  4. Barrasso Has violated his oath to do no harm to his patience. Some how that does not surprise me.

  5. Hopefully this move does not result in a huge amount of medical bankruptcies to Wyoming citizens especially when coupled with push to reduce Wyoming Department of Health budget

  6. Perhaps if the representatives that are elected to state offices weren’t (b)millionaires or backed by the same, we wouldn’t be in this position ever since I can remember. Barrasso , Lummis, and Hageman are so out of touch with the state populous that they will never side with the common man/woman that reside in this great state. Sorry, but don’t expect it to change as long as the likes of these three keep getting elected.

  7. Dr Barrasso’s position is so obviously counter to what is in the best interest of Wyomingites, that it is hard to understand why he is doing this and saying these silly, misleading things. In normal times would this doom his re-election? I can only guess that Republican party pressure is overwhelming his good sense, and what he knows. The ACA is not a failure. It has done good things for Wyoming, and for the health insurance market — for instance, ended underwriting for those with pre-existing conditions, and dramatically expanding coverage. And it is not the ACA that is causing healthcare costs to go up. That is a larger, different problem. And, by the way, there is a “medical loss ratio” guarantee in the ACA that prevents insurers from “profiteering” by raising rates. Rates are going up because of claims costs, not profiteering. There is no “windfall” in the ACA for insurers. If I have done the math right, the subsidies would amount to about 3% of the annual federal budget. It was the Republicans who terminated the revenue raising provisions in the ACA that were in the law to offset the cost of these subsidies — taxes on “Cadillac” benefits, medical devices, payments from those who did not enroll in a health plan. Now, because of Barrasso, it seems likely that 10’s of thousands of Wyomingites will drop coverage they can’t afford, and providers will be faced with caring for more uninsured, and will shift costs to the insured, making healthcare in Wyoming more expensive for everyone. I’m sure he knows all this. This is a fight over 3% of annual spending that hurts the poorest, while there is an elephant in the room — tax breaks for the wealthy increasing our 31 trillion national debt. We really need some senators who keep their eye on the ball.

  8. The fact to the mater is that every one of the Wyoming elected delegation could care less about the people of Wyoming and only care about there billionaire elite.

  9. Dear Senator Barrasso,

    The ACA is what we have, along with the other mish-mash of insurance coverage (employer coverage, Medicare, etc). You and the GOP have determined the ACA is a disaster and we can’t afford it anymore. Perhaps…..but instead of working for the people of Wyoming and the country to work through regular order to revise or replace the ACA with something better, you and the GOP will eliminate the premium support resulting in many people going without healthcare. That is cold hearted and irresponsible and should never happen in the US. You and your GOP buddies will be ones the American people hold responsible.

  10. Why should our representative care about health cost? They are covered for life with health care and a pensions plus other donation to their worthy life styles.

    Oh and remember YOU voted for them. Their allegiance is to only to trump.

  11. So what is the Republican plan? The clown-in-chief says he has a “concept” of a plan but he is lying. Bareasso is not representing his constituents. Recall him and lummus

  12. Pretty obvious this site only approves comments that align with the far-left ideology and not reality.

    1. Looks like your comment made it in just fine Mr. Maunu.

      Being critical of Barrasso, Lummis, or Hageman doesn’t necessarily mean someone is “far-left” as you’ve suggested. Perhaps it means that they might have a better grasp on the “reality” that you’ve mentioned than you do based on the past behavior of these three people that you are obviously not aware of or are OK with.

  13. Ms. Klingsporn,

    Please stop calling the ACA “Obamacare.” This is a GOP pejorative that has no place in journalism.

  14. The problem is not so much the ACA, the problem is the U.S. healthcare system is a for-profit mishmash of disparate of public and private insurers and payment plans that were cobbled together to deal with economic issues as they became politically relevant. The result is an increasingly unaffordable, ineffective mess that no longer meets the needs of patients, doctors, and independent hospitals. The fix is known, some kind of non-profit, universal system, such as either the German or the Canadian system. Sadly, since the 1950s, legislation for national healthcare for all has been repeatedly introduced to no avail. The Medicare for All Act, proposed in April 2025, by Sanders, Dingell, and Jayapal would make healthcare affordable for everyone, but I don’t see Wyoming’s Congressional representatives voting for it.

    1. I completely agree! As long as the profit motive dominates the healthcare system, people will suffer. I will never forget a fellow teacher, desperately ill with terminal cancer, but supporting two children, who dragged herself to the first two weeks of school because of she didn’t, her health insurance would lapse. She died that weekend. Cruel and heartless!

  15. It was fine when the poorest among us couldn’t afford health insurance, but now that it’s happening to the people who voted for this, there’s outrage. We’ve elected a mafia organization to lead the world, which is going to cause regret for all of us on many levels. Healthcare is just the beginning. Universal healthcare is what makes the most sense, but heaven forbid we cut out the middle man. That would be socialism!

  16. “What [the Democrats] are proposing isn’t a serious plan,” Barrasso said on the U.S. Senate floor. “It’s a disaster. Our nation can’t afford it.”

    Coming to you from the party; who gave 40 billion to Argentina for….?, 12 billion in aid to farmers who only needed it because of the current admin’s policies, and thats trying to start another oil war, this time in South America.

    the only thing we cant afford is helping regular people.

    1. Regular people? I think you mean unproductive people who are a drag on society. People who contribute to society receive healthcare through their employer. Using taxpayer money to take care of lazy and entitled clowns is not a serious proposal.

      1. Mr Mauna,
        How dare you pass judgement on millions of Americans who can’t sustain paying these kind of premiums! Who are you to decide whether ANYONE is unproductive? Of course there are those who may be so, but you only know your own story, no one else’s. I’ll bet you are just a devout Christian, living a life of which Jesus would be proud. Hah!

      2. Wow. What an ugly view of your neighbors.

        The number of employers that provide health insurance coverage is dwindling. Plus, all farmers/ranchers have to buy insurance in the marketplace. They are certainly not those who might be called lazy. Nor should fast food workers, retail employees, custodial staffs, et al. Additionally, employers often fail to schedule folks for a full 40 hour week just so that they can avoid providing benefits.

        1. A true view of how the real world works, Farmers Ranchers , who rely on the ACA, those who make 15 or 16 dollars and hour to provide services really have no ability to do a health savings account. Many have been tricked in catastrophic plan which in the long run covers no preexisting conditions. Have a heart attack and see that denied because high cholesterol was a preexisting condition. Just a scam to make people feel like they have coverage

      3. Mr. Mauna, you are ignorant or just ignoring the fact that hard working self-employed people such as myself, who is trying to build a small construction company, have to buy our own insurance. The ONLY choice in Wyoming right now is BCBS, and my policy just went up over $2,000/ month, so I will go without health insurance. I believe it is people like you who care not a spit for the well being of their neighbors who are the drag on our society. Shame.

      4. Small businesses are the backbone of America. The owner and one or two employees depend on the ACA for their health insurance. Prices skyrocket, the workers can’t afford coverage, the owner can’t either. Your disparagement of anyone who doesn’t work for a large corporation is thoughtless, at best.

      5. Some of us taxpayers do not get our health insurance through our employers. You are very out of touch.

  17. While it’s appropriate to focus on the huge premiums ( lowest available monthly premium is $1,585 for this 58-year old woman), I rarely see the deductibles mentioned in media coverage. $10,600!!!!!

  18. This is so sad I could cry. Working people in my family depend on these subsidies to help with the high cost of insurance . I dont want to get too political, BUT if this administration can afford $4 TRILLION with a T to billionaires over 10 years of tax cuts, $9 Billion (B) to buy 10% stock in the company Intel, and $40 BILLION with a B to Argentina — then they can help Americans. Remember America FIRST on the campaign, a promise made is a promise kept was said —I know that was a big FAT lie.

  19. Seems to me there are two paths forward. Either extend the ACA credits or pass the Republican alternative plan. Wait! There is no Republican plan.

  20. Look out Wyoming. With a low population to spread the risk, insurance rates will sky rocket for residents. Senator Barrasso is not looking out for you!

  21. 347%, the simple number of how much my insurance is going up, and that is with me picking the next level cheaper.
    We just need this… by government, its citizens, us humans, “the capacity of a society to meet the basic human needs of its citizens, establish the building blocks that allow citizens and communities to enhance and sustain the quality of their lives, and create the conditions for all individuals to reach their full potential.”

  22. The health care system in the U.S. is enormously expensive compared to other countries around the world. Just Google blank countries health care system as percentage of GDP and fill in the blank. For all the money spent, outcomes are pretty lousy too. Does Barrasso have a solution? I’m afraid not. We’ll just stumble along aimlessly if we keep electing self centered, no idea, knot heads like Barrasso.

    1. Yup…pretty much everything you wrote is true but there is the other side of the question……Canada, has such a system……you end up in the hospital and it basically cost nothing for it’s citizens. But…how is it funded? Canada pays for its universal healthcare (like Medicare but for everyone) primarily through taxes collected by federal, provincial, and territorial governments, funding essential hospital and doctor services for all citizens. BTW, In Finland if you get caught speeding your fine is determined by your income. In Teton County that could fund the entire state budget.

  23. the republican plan is a joke and barrASSo knows it, it doesn’t lower costs for anybody and does nothing to fix our broken health care system!

  24. Barrasso has health benefits for senators that are comprehensive and subsidized through the government, and he is wealthy. Comparable to most of those who are making these decisions for us. Does he care about his Wyoming constituents? I think not! Remember this on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 when he comes up for reelection.

  25. Since Trump is a convicted felony rapist and a 34 counts of business fraud…now a war crime criminal and SCOTUS crimes…Sunset Clause Trump’s Bill 2025 and arrest him and his entire cabinet like his last cabinet whom are in Prison…Steve Bannon move to Russia

  26. Yes especially Barrasso who took the Hippocratic oath to do no harm. Its like pulling the rug out from under many people. Looks like this will cause harm to those who need it.

    1. “Do no harm”, died an excruciating painful death a very long time ago.

      If you don’t believe me, watch the disclaimer at the end of any pharmaceutical advertisement.

      When practicing medicine became a lucrative business and money entered the equation, doing harm was unavoidable and “acceptable”.

      Look into Rockefeller and Carnegie investments into Medical Schools at the turn of the 20th century. There was money to be made in American Healthcare.

  27. Does anyone believe that Barrasso represents us, or ever did? He initially won his seat in a partisan beauty contest (in which the party bosses, not the people, chose him). He has had two goals since arriving in DC: advancing the national party’s agenda (he’s a sycophantic Trumpist) and advancing his personal rank in the party, even if it means throwing Wyomingites under the bus. He’s now spouting the usual lies – that Obamacare is inherently bad (it’s far from optimal, but that’s because he and other partisans have sabotaged it and won’t let it be fixed) and that somehow going back to allowing pre-existing conditions not to be covered and individual policies that are guaranteed to pay for nothing would be better. My prediction: Due to his irresponsibility, NO change will get through the Senate and tens of thousands of Wyomingites (about 10% of our state) will face huge premiums or give up insurance altogether because it’s unaffordable. Those people, denied preventive care, will show up at emergency rooms for uncompensated care and bankrupt our rural hospitals despite the pittance they’ll receive in “aid.” It will be a disaster in Wyoming health care, caused by an MD who has betrayed his oath to do no harm.

    1. I agree with you completely Brett.
      It’s bad enough that Wyoming has one senator that’s abandoned his constituents in pursuit of his personal agenda but we’ve also got Lummis who isn’t any better. Hageman hasn’t shown any original thoughts while she’s been in the House and has stuck firmly to the MAGA line so Wyoming has won the trifecta with the three people who are supposed to be making things better for everyone who voted for them. Luckily I’m not one of them.
      Financially, none of them will experience the problems they’re helping to create for a lot of people in this state due to their blind allegiance to this president. Each one was very well off before running for office so they won’t be hurt. I was pleased to read that Barrasso is a “retired” physician and I’m hoping Barrasso,Lummis and Hageman will be retired from politics sooner than later because they are certainly not representing Wyoming.

  28. Not to be too callous, but when all the Wyoming voters who support these monsters kick the bucket early, the fishing will improve.

    1. Yikes! With 70% of the state out the door those fish would have enough room to grow into true whoppers…I can only imagine the tale Rod Miller could conjure over that one.

  29. Ya, way to say the same thing over and over and over. For decades now. And never any sort of plan. Ever. Just the same old song and dance. Does he even legislate anymore? Or just lick Donnie’s loafers all day??

  30. Way to advocate for your constituents wellbeing once again John. (Sarcasm)
    But, I can’t help but wonder if all the trillions flooding in from tariffs, combined with the savings afforded us by DOGE, and the 20 billion we just gave to Argentina was applied to helping Americans get healthcare? 🤔
    (Still sarcasm)

  31. Ever since Obama introduced the concept of the ACA, I’ve heard all the negative rhetoric from Wyoming’s GOP politicians. Both State and Federal. I cannot recall any of them offering anything better.

    1. Yes they said Repeal and replace. Seems like they should have a replace plan in place before repeal plan. This shows their original intentions and current intentions

  32. Obamacare ensured spikes for Wyoming consumers since its inception.

    ACA/Obamacare has been a dismal failure for ALL Americans that dont directly profit from the Medical Industrial Complex and Insurance Industry.

    1. Right. This is a copy and paste comment. Because premiums and everything else healthcare was just fine before the ACA? Costs going down?? Call a spade a spade: if a white guy named Dan had come up with it the whole thing as prez…..you’d whine a more coherent argument. 🙄

      1. Molly, I have worked in Healthcare since 1990. I have personally witnessed the dismantling of the best Healthcare system in the world become a Medical Industrial Complex completely driven by profit and money.
        US Healthcare was in no way perfect, but the ACA turned it into something that can never be reformed, the monetary stakeholders will not allow it.
        My opinion is in no way shaped by politics, it is based purely on personal observations from inside the system.

        1. Industrial Complex completely driven by profit and money.
          US Healthcare was in no way perfect, but the ACA turned it into something that can never be reformed, the monetary stakeholders will not allow it.”

          “The monetary stakeholders will not allow it” is spot on, but this was understood prior to ACA.

        2. The healthcare system that was in place before the Heritage Society and Ronald Reagan privatized public facilities was outstanding. Privatization introduced the profit motive, and things have gone downhill since then.

        3. Chad G. You are the winner 🏆 anyone who has worked 10 years and paid taxes into this healthcare system qualified at one time BUT the ACA has groomed it into a profit based system not health-care system

    2. the only reason that the US had “good” healthcare before the ACA was that insurance companies didnt have to actually provide coverage to sick people.

  33. Dr John Barrasso says we can’t afford this, but somehow we can afford the extension of tax breaks for the already wealthy that he, Lummis and Hageman all endorsed in the One Big Ugly Bill? I am still waiting for the improvement on the Affordable Care Act he assured me he and other Republicans were working on back in 2017 when he voted to end the ACA. It’s only been eight years since that promise; surely he has something, right?

  34. Our delegation has failed us mightily, especially Barrasso. They’ve had since Covid to work out alternate plans. What good is Barrasso’s big deal leadership position if he only serves the wealthy. When all is said and done he won’t have much of a legacy when he finally retires.

  35. The real disaster here is Barrasso and the other Trump minions. This is a Dr that voted for RFK. Think about that. You’re getting what you voted for.

    1. To be fair, Barrasso did push back a bit on RFKJr’s quackery during a recent hearing. But only a BIT. If RFKJr is impeached, Barrasso likely won’t vote to remove.

  36. Barrasso and Lummis’ act of callousness, which will severely hurt thousands of Wyoming citizens and millions of American citizens, may paradoxically help get us to Medicare 4 All. Finally.