Share this:

CHEYENNE—Sen. Laura Pearson suspects a barrage of correspondence from upset hunters effectively killed the two landowner hunting license proposals she’d been championing. 

“I had a few constituents send me screenshots,” Pearson, a Kemmerer Republican, told WyoFile. “I think it was social media posts.”

The messages, she explained, came out a few days ago. They encouraged hunters to contact Pearson and other senators in opposition to one proposal in particular.

That now-dead bill, Senate File 51, would have opened the door for property owners to sell special elk, deer and pronghorn licenses on an open market. Pearson attempted a similar bill last year, then withdrew it, but came back this year with the support of the Wyoming Legislature’s Joint Agriculture, State and Public Lands and Water Resources Interim Committee. Still, on Monday afternoon, the first day of the 2026 budget session, state senators shot down the bill 6-25 — far short of the two-thirds support required for it to advance. 

Sen. Laura Pearson, a Kemmerer Republican, on the opening day of the Wyoming Legislature’s 2026 budget session. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

A related Agriculture Committee-sponsored landowner hunting license bill that Pearson championed, Senate File 15, is also now dead. Voted down 9-22, the proposal would have set a floor for the percentage of hunting licenses that landowners were entitled to in limited quota areas to not less than 40%.

Hunting and fishing advocacy groups have opposed Pearson-pushed reforms to Wyoming’s landowner license statutes out of concern that the measures would be a detriment to public hunters. When the Game and Fish Department administers a lottery for licenses where there are a finite number available, landowner licenses are allocated first — before the rest of the public gets a shot. The pool of licenses left is therefore diminished, and in some Wyoming hunt areas the share that goes to landowners is significant

Pearson has argued that her efforts are aimed at helping agricultural and livestock producers make ends meet. Selling landowner licenses is allowed to various degrees in other western states, and when the tags are auctioned off they can net significant sums.

“I’m looking out for the landowner,” she said. “Ag land is feeding these animals year-round.” 

State wildlife officials anticipate that making landowner licenses “transferable” would increase interest in the program, which dates to 1949 in Wyoming. Currently, only a portion of eligible landowners apply for them. 

Acquiring a landowner license depends on a number of factors. Recipients must possess at least 160 acres, and they must provide habitat for the species the license is granted for. Up to two licenses per species per property can be procured for elk, deer, pronghorn and wild turkeys. The licenses are good throughout the hunt area. 

Last summer, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department sought to tighten its landowner license requirements, but reeled back the proposal after it sparked vociferous opposition. 

Game and Fish lacks the authority to put a cap on the percentage of licenses that go to landowners in hunt areas. A separate bill that’s still alive this legislative session would change that: Senate File 25 would allow the agency’s commission to make rules imposing a cap in limited-quota hunt areas. Shortly before the two Pearson-backed bills out of the Agriculture Committee died, Senate File 25 passed its introductory vote 30-1, with only Pearson opposed. 

Sen. Bill Landen, a Casper Republican, during the Wyoming Legislature’s 2026 budget session. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The measure was routed through the Legislature’s Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee, which typically deals with Game and Fish-related statutes. Sen. Bill Landen, a Casper Republican and committee co-chair, attributed part of its success to “protocol.” 

“That was an interim topic that was provided to Travel and Wildlife,” Landen said. 

The Legislature’s Management Council typically assigns topics to be studied between sessions to the body’s various committees. The Agriculture Committee began reviewing landowner licenses — even though it wasn’t assigned — under the chairmanship of Sen. Tim French, who had strong feelings about the issue. French relinquished that seat after he was assigned to the Appropriations Committee. 

Jess Johnson, government affairs director for the Wyoming Wildlife Federation, was pleased by Monday’s results in the Senate. The two measures that died were “divisive,” needlessly creating a wedge between public hunters and landowners, she said. But Johnson was much more upbeat about the surviving bill, SF 25, which gives the Game and Fish Commission the flexibility to make changes, but doesn’t demand them. 

“It offers the commission the authority to place a cap on landowner tags in areas that may have 100% landowner tags — where there is no opportunity for a sportsman to draw,” Johnson said. 

Landen anticipates that SF 25 will be considered by the Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee on Thursday, though it’s not yet slated in the legislative committee. 

Pearson, meanwhile, is weighing next steps and will consider bringing another transferable landowner license bill in the 2027 general session. 

“I don’t think this is a topic that can be swept under the rug,” Pearson said. “Hunters are mad, the landowners are mad. This issue in Wyoming, we have to find a solution for it.”

Reforming the landowner license system is a political hill she’s willing to die on. 

“I’m not somebody that’s going to vote a certain way because I think a population is going to say, ‘She needs [to be] replaced,’” Pearson said. “That is the last thing on my mind.”

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *