Were it not for the freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment, politicians in the U.S. could get away unpunished with just about anything. The political gravestones of stupid politicians throughout our history all bear the inscription, “Courtesy of the Free Press.”

Opinion

Things didn’t start out that way, though. The first newspaper published in the New World was “Publick Occurrences Both Forreign and Domestick,” a cumbersome title indeed. It was published in Boston by Richard Pierce in 1690. After a single issue, it was shut down for criticizing the British colonial governor.

Round 1 in the tussle between the people’s right to know and political power was won by power.

Then came the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the guarantee of a free press in America. Game, set and match in favor of the people’s right to know.

Since then, our history is rife with examples of powerful politicians embroiling themselves in scandals of every stripe, the free press exposing and reporting on those scandals, then the guilty politicians whining like gutshot geese and blaming the media for their self-inflicted political wounds. This pattern has repeated itself over and over again, and folks in power never seem to get the message.

It’s almost as if politicians think that, if they try often enough, sooner or later they can do something stupid and get away with it because nobody will find out. In this cat-and-mouse game between power and the press, the free press has consistently cornered the mouse, and informed the American public what is going on with those that we have placed in power.

And when that happens, the mouse always cries “foul” and blames the press for his predicament.

My favorite example is President Richard Nixon. Had Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post not filed their stories about the Watergate break-in and Nixon’s subsequent attempts to cover his ass, the American public would have been kept in the dark, and Nixon would have served out his term instead of resigning in disgrace. But the Post published, and Nixon blamed the press instead of himself for his downfall.

Delve through our history for yourselves to find other examples. They are many, and make for fascinating reading.

Closer to home and the present day, this same pattern is now playing out in the Wyoming Legislature. Freedom Caucus legislators and their apologists who have been caught red-handed in the “Checkgate” scandal have taken to the floor of the Wyoming House to blame their plight on a media frenzy. Speaker of the House Chip Neiman, during his admission of accepting a check and insistence that he did nothing wrong, said that he could hear pens breaking and paper tearing as reporters scrambled to document his mea culpa.

What did he expect? Did he think that a vibrant free press would sit on their pens for a few days and give him time and space to conjure a way to weasel out of this uncomfortable situation?

If so, he doesn’t sufficiently understand our history or that of the press. Woodward and Bernstein would have violated their responsibilities as journalists had they sat on their story long enough for Nixon to use the power at his fingertips to perfect his cover-up.

A free people deserves more from a free press than for the media to provide time and space for powerful politicians to conceal their misdeeds.

I, for one, would have it no other way. In fact, I would call into question the civic-mindedness and patriotism of anyone who would suggest that the press should hold their fire and let politicians do their backroom deals out of the public eye. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and there is no better source of sunlight than a press that is free to inform the citizenry.

And to politicians who blame the press for their problems, and try to muzzle their freedom to publish, I offer this old saying, “Never get into a pissing match with someone who buys ink by the barrel or paper by the roll.”

Or, as in the case of the digital media for which I write, someone who uses gazillions of electrons to shine sunlight on your mistakes.

Columnist Rod Miller is a Wyoming native, raised on his family's cattle ranch in Carbon County. He graduated from Rawlins High School, home of the mighty Outlaws, where he was named Outstanding Wrestler...

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Good points, m’friend. An example: I read two articles last weekend about a young movie celebrity, whom I won’t name. The first was an observational account of how he was “celebrating” at Mardi Gras in New Orleans. It had him enthusiastically participating in the usual drinking and parading in the crowds at the festival. The second portrayed him as a fallen off the wagon, drunken, bar fight starting hooligan, who ended up narrowly escaping arrest. Two sides to the same timeline of events and two different “interpretations”, apparently based on the writer’s basic like or dislike of the young lad in question. I like him, despite his sometimes inebriated antics, so I decided I was glad he had a good time, rather than declaring that he needs to go back to rehab. Just sayin’, I made up my own mind about it, as opinions are always subjective.

  2. Well, that’s supposed to be how our Founders intended the media to hold those in power accountable. Anymore that’s a lot like motherhood and apple pie if we believe the media has no bias. Fake news is still just fake news and whatever generates the most clicks wins.

    The term ‘yellow journalism’ preceded the ‘fake news’ label when Hearst and Pulitzer created the Spanish American war to help sell their newspapers. We’ve all watched the media hype ‘global cooling’ then ‘global warming’ then Covid and any other suitable narrative that fits the moment and sells.

    Trust in news is tanking. Massive layoffs are everywhere. We’re watching all of Europe lurch back into the dark abyss of censorship at industrial scale to control the views of the masses while we’re chomping at the bit on this side too. Trump has over $65B in various lawsuits against media giants who continue to spin fake news, alter video clips, make him look like he’s said or done something wrong when he said the opposite. Drag him through one court or another over and over again. It’s all just horrendously bad.

    In our tiny corner of the universe, yes these Wyo Legislators accepting cheques on the floor of the Legislature is terrible optics. I’m sure there’ll be many a mailer out this summer parading the visuals and hyping the worst connotations. Such is politics. The worst will be published and assumed now. After facts are gathered and the actual intentions identified, then will come the footnote somewhere that – well – half the Legislature really weren’t taking bribes on the floor. But the damage is already done in prep for the fall elections. Success! All’s fair in love, war and politics.

    1. What kind of disconnect is needed to lecture on “fake news”?

      You are a proponent of stolen elections and qanon absurdity. Your whole political belief system is built on lies.

      Political differences will never be overcome when you subscribe to different realities. Chrumper hypocrisy never fails to amaze me.

  3. Spot on again Rod! Freedom of the Press is essential, no matter the complaints from maga, the freedom cause or the orange stain.

  4. I totally agree, but am frustrated that press is increasingly controlled by the powerful and rich. It used to be very easy to send opinion pieces off to the local press until it no longer is. I can remember Charles Levendovsky of the Casper Star that encourage opinon pieces. I dropped by his office years ago for a tutorial and it was a revelation.
    WyoFile is a gift to Wyoming residents, as it Public Radio. Politicians, however, are doing their best to get rid of public news, as it is a thorn in their sides with its unbiased, truthful news. It is essential that citizens contribute to their missions. Otherwise, corruption will reign.

  5. Just a point to ponder. If humans were actually honest, square dealing, compassionate, non judgmental, without greed or avarice would the world be in the mess it is in?

    Unfortunately human nature is none of the above. Our violent and sordid world history emphatically has proven that over and over again.

    We get our politicians from the rank and file. They are us and we are them. Until the human race can provide a better product the press will always have plenty of cannon fodder to point out its transgressions.

    Dave Gustafson

    1. Your point is well taken Dave. The only thing I would add is that some people are definitely more decent than others. Somehow the “others” seem to have the upper hand lately.

  6. Damned right Rod. Anyone stupid enough to criticize this opinion piece opens into question their own civic mindedness and patriotism as you noted because the First Amendment was first for a good reason.

  7. Right on, Mr. Miller. I would add that, as corrupt as Nixon was, he at least had the decency to resign.

    1. Nixon was minor league compared to his successors over the last 50 years, ALL of them.

      And the lapdog media does exactly whatever their role in the scripted political theater dictates.

  8. Rod you bring forward that a free press demonstrates the concept that a lie told a million times does not make the lie a truth.