Watered down Medicaid expansion proposal survives in the House

by Ron Feemster
— February 21, 2014

In its last act before adjourning Friday evening, the Wyoming House of Representatives passed a budget amendment that authorizes the state to negotiate with the federal government and create a Medicaid expansion plan for Wyoming.

The plan would then be presented to the state Legislature during its regular session next year. The Legislature would decide what, if any, action might be taken to expand Medicaid in the state.

A nearly identical amendment failed in the Senate Friday morning. The amendment resembles in important ways Senate File 118, authored by Sen. Chris Rothfuss (D-Laramie). That bill survived the two-thirds hurdle to be introduced in the Senate by a vote of 21-9. But after debate, it was defeated 21-9.

Unlike Rothfuss’s bill, third reading House budget amendment 34 does not call for immediate expansion of Medicaid under the normal rules of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Taking out this provision, which has proved unpopular with many Republicans, seems to have put the amendment over the top.

Rothfuss’s bill would have offered immediate health coverage to the estimated 17,600 people too poor to buy subsidized coverage on the Affordable Care Act exchange. But it would have done so by expanding the existing Medicaid population to cover them in what is often known as “straight Medicaid expansion.”

Rep. Mary Throne (D-Cheyenne) withdrew an amendment that would have restored the first year of Medicaid expansion after Barlow’s amendment passed. With that, no proposals that could have expanded Medicaid in Wyoming this year remained alive in the state Legislature.

The state’s failure to cover its poorest residents immediately will cost Wyoming at least 15 of the 36 months of full federal subsidies for Medicaid expansion. In addition to the human costs, the state is passing up millions of dollars in federal money that would have been spent on Wyoming people who need medical care.

Gov. Matt Mead said in his State of the State address that Wyoming needs to find an alternative to Medicaid expansion, but none has emerged during the first two weeks of the budget session.

The budget amendment will go to conference committee for House Bill 1 and Senate File 1. Joint Appropriations Committee co-chairmen Sen. Eli Bebout (R-Riverton) and Rep. Steve Harshman (R-Casper) are sure to lead the committee, but the other members have not yet been chosen.

It is far from clear that any version of the House amendment can survive conference negotiations after the sharp defeat of a mirror amendment in the Senate Friday morning. But few people who have followed the rocky path of Medicaid expansion bills in Wyoming expected to see even this watered-down amendment alive two weeks into the session.

In the eyes of many advocates, it would take a miracle for the amendment to emerge unscathed from conference committee.

If that should occur, the Legislature would supplant its 2012 law forbidding any state agency or employee to take action to implement the Affordable Care Act without legislative approval. That law — which was also passed as a budget amendment in a budget session — has hamstrung the state Department of Health.

Among many other groups, the tribes on the Wind River Indian Reservation would be happy to see the department able to talk with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. A bill that would have allowed the Department of Health to discuss possible Medicaid waivers for clients of Indian Health Service failed to win introduction in the House last week.

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.