This column discusses sexual assault. If you or someone you know has experienced sexual assault call 800.656.HOPE (4673) to be connected with a trained staff member from a sexual assault service provider.

Opinion

There is a point when crossing the Garfield Street pedestrian bridge in Laramie where the overhead lights stop working. In daylight, this sidewalk suspended above the Union Pacific Railroad is quite magnificent. You can see in all directions across the highway to the mountains and watch the trains pass below.

At night, on the side where the lights don’t work, you can’t see anything; not even what’s a few yards ahead. It has been this way since I moved to Laramie’s West Side Neighborhood six years ago, working only sporadically before returning to its lightless stasis. 

In late September, after a survivor filed a civil lawsuit, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul reopened a closed 2024 investigation of the alleged gang rape of Jane Doe at Cornell University. National news outlets were ablaze with a slew of previously unreleased information regarding the case from past records, the accused fraternity members and the Cornell campus. 

Survivors and allies across the nation began declaring themselves “Jane Doe” in solidarity with Cornell’s Doe-of-note. Meanwhile, speculation about her recollection of the attack became fodder for comment sections and talk show commentary. We’re met with the all-too-familiar questioning of the attacked woman’s responsibility in “inviting” the young men to her body. 

This Jane Doe’s story is not new. There is no novelty in the discourse around the alleged perpetrators’ responsibility to the survivor, to one another, to those they see as objects of sexual desire. To women, this is a familiar walk down an uncomfortable path — as familiar as the dark stretch on my commute home across the railroad.Stories of assault and half-hearted institutional attempts to reconcile are not unique to a private college fraternity across the country. Our neighbors cautiously move through our towns, aware of the darkness that surrounds them, regardless of where we live. Wyoming’s small towns hold stories of atrocious crimes, too. 

Even cowboys are perpetrators. 

Even cowboys are survivors. 

Women swap horror stories in private conversations about where to be extra cautious, share recommendations of purse-sized protection devices and walk each other to their cars just in case. They don’t make these choices because of young men’s poor choices in Ithaca, New York. These choices come from experience — local and relatable. 

According to a statewide assessment from the Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault/Colorado Futures Center, 25% of adult women in Wyoming have experienced sexual assault. Statistically, it would be unusual for you to not know someone who has experienced assault. And chances are, you know someone who has committed assault. 

In a Wyoming Crime Statistics report from the Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation, only 80 of the 434 sexual assault crimes reported in 2025 were reported as perpetrated by a stranger or unknown individual. More than 8 in 10 were perpetrated by family, acquaintances and intimate partners. The dark truth isn’t a stranger in the shadows. It’s someone we know.

Cornell’s survivor reported the intimate details of her attack, left school and exchanged her planned future and her name for a pseudonym no woman wants. Jane Does across the country could line up to stretch from Laramie to Ithaca. Yet somehow they go unseen, as if the light can’t quite reach.

The pedestrian bridge in downtown Laramie is simply an unlit sidewalk. Its care is held somewhere between a national railroad corporation and a well-meaning small-town government. A lit path would be appreciated, but I’m not asking someone to change a light bulb for me. 

I want to know that you see the same dark I see. 

The Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault is a tenant of the Laramie Plains Civic Center, where the author serves as executive director.

Jessica Brauer is a Wyoming nonprofit leader and writer dedicated to equitable rural development and the creative economy. She serves as executive director of the Laramie Plains Civic Center and as board...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I suggest that Jessica check out Megyn Kelly’s coverage of the Cornell case. Based on evidence obtained by Kelly (lawyer before becoming a journalist); ‘Jane’ was a willing participant and initiated some of the encounters she now claims were non-consensual.

    It appears this was a case of debauchery by a bunch of stupid college students of both sexes.

    The bottom line; facts matter, feelings don’t.