GILLETTE—A dark gray SUV parked at the entrance of Gillette College’s main building Wednesday evening to deliver dozens of pizzas from Pizza Carrello, a local favorite. Inside, residents began to fill the commons area with slices in hand and questions on their minds.

Calgary, Alberta-based Nucleon Energy invited the community to learn about its freshly proposed Fort Union Uranium Conversion Facility, a $575 million project to convert uranium to uranium hexafluoride — the gas that is then enriched to eventually fuel nuclear reactor power plants.

“Right now, there’s a lot of new industries coming to Gillette, so it seems like a good thing to keep abreast of it,” said David Freeman, a 20-something utility industry worker donning a wide-brimmed felt hat. He brought questions about how the conversion process works and told WyoFile he’s particularly curious about the economic viability of the project.

“That’s an issue that we see a lot in Gillette,” Freeman said. “We have a lot of industry, but it’s getting strangled.”

Ceremonial shovels mark the location of the Innovation Center coal refinery field demonstration project north of Gillette on Sept. 2, 2022. A Canadian firm proposes to build a uranium conversion plant at the same location. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Known as the Energy Capital for its massive coal mines — the largest coal-producing complex in North America — and for its prolific oil and natural gas fields, residents here have witnessed coal production shrink by half since the 2000s. Dozens of schemes to market Powder River Basin coal beyond simply being burned to generate electricity, with the exception of one, have come and gone.

Yet uranium mining here, and throughout the state, is once again on the rise, putting Gillette and Campbell County in the sights of prospective nuclear energy developers. Last year, longtime U.S. Navy contractor BWXT proposed a $500 million TRISO nuclear fuel manufacturing facility — an unfamiliar lane even for Gillette, where residents embrace drilling and mining and take pride in their outsized role in powering the nation.

But Nucleon Energy, like BWXT, sees Gillette and its energy prowess as a perfect fit. The workforce here has the necessary skills, the region has the right industrial infrastructure, and many elected officials are eager for the prospect of adding another link in the nuclear fuel-chain in the state rather than shipping Wyoming mined U-3O8 to be processed elsewhere.

“We had looked at a number of different states, eventually [decided on] Wyoming, given its capabilities in uranium mining, its regulatory sophistication, the openness of the community, the community leaders, the industrial base, the types of companies that support the energy sector now and, of course, institutions like Gillette College,” Nucleon Energy Chief Development Officer and Co-founder Ryan Tourigny told WyoFile. “All of these things were big, attractive forces to us.”

A Nucleon Energy official fields questions from Gillette area residents. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Meanwhile, residents at the event said they have a lot of questions, and some weren’t satisfied with responses.

“They wouldn’t answer my concerns about training,” Campbell County resident Kelley Boltin said. “What’s the risk of bringing it here? What happens if a spill occurs? What happens if it comes in contact with water? If there’s a cloud [of spilled hexafluoride] where does that cloud travel?”

“It’s not that I am antinuclear,” Boltin added. “But I think safety is No. 1. Before you set your shop up here, you should assure people of your safety protocols.” 

The project

Nucleon, and its subsidiary Nucleon Fuel, envisions the first of potentially three conversion units, or “trains,” would be in operation by 2032, according to Tourigny. The facility, located at the Fort Union Industrial Park just north of town, would convert natural uranium — the U-3O8, or “yellowcake” that Wyoming mines produce — into uranium hexafluoride (UF₆). That’s the step before the material is enriched.

“The radiation of the product is exactly what’s being mined,” he said.

Right now, there’s only one commercial yellowcake-to-hexafluoride facility in the U.S., and that’s in Metropolis, Illinois. That’s where most of Wyoming yellowcake is trucked. Each phase, or train, at Nucleon’s conversion plant would have the capacity to convert about 5,000 metric tons.

Nucleon Energy Chief Development Officer and Co-founder Ryan Tourigny. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

If all three trains are eventually built, it would double the nation’s current hexafluoride conversion capacity, Tourigny said.

From there, the hexafluoride — a gas packaged into vessels resembling large propane tanks — is typically shipped to an enrichment facility in New Mexico. After that, the material could potentially find its way back to Gillette at BWXT’s TRISO manufacturing facility.

“We have, of course, noticed that BWXT is considering making a TRISO facility in the area, and that’s interesting as well,” Tourigny said.

The Wyoming Energy Authority recently recommended Nucleon’s project for a $20 million Energy Dominance Fund grant to leverage matching dollars from others. Nucleon has indicated it may apply for an additional $10 million from the state program in the form of a loan.

In addition to state and federal agency reviews, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is the primary authority to review, license and certify the facility, according to Tourigny. The company is already engaged in “pre-application” discussions with the commission and expects to begin filing formal applications to the regulatory agency in about a year, he added.

Initial impressions, questions

A lot of pizza was consumed Wednesday evening. But some attendees said they didn’t like the format of the event, which encouraged people to walk from station to station to ask Nucleon officials questions rather than a presentation where questions are fielded in front of the entire audience.

“They want to do it individually which, to me, I don’t think does service because nobody knows what they’re saying,” Campbell County resident Kyle Maretech said. “So I think a lot of people here are put off by that.”

Nucleon Energy invited Gillette area residents to Gillette College on Oct. 28, 2026, to learn about its proposed uranium conversion plant. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Gillette resident Karin Ebertz said she was simply curious, adding that she’s “on the fence” about whether she’d like to see the project come to fruition.

“Production at the coal mines is decreasing,” she said. “It would be good to have some more economic development in our community, and I’m just really curious and interested in what this is.”

Rolf Arands, a chemical engineer and candidate for Gillette City Council, said he’d worked at a nuclear energy site in Europe and had a lot of questions about the chemical process and safety considerations.

“I’m not a nuclear expert, but I’ve been around the materials enough to know a lot of the safety protocols, and that’s what’s really on my mind.”

Nucleon is already sharing feedback from residents internally, “to ensure that the questions, comments and insights from neighbors are included as the project’s design progresses,” Tourigny told WyoFile following the event.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *