Under Wyoming law, a juvenile convicted of second-degree murder can, in some cases, receive a harsher sentence than they would under the more serious first-degree murder charge. 

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed Tuesday that a 42- to 75-year sentence for a Casper teen who pleaded guilty to second-degree murder is not unusual punishment under the Wyoming Constitution, nor does it violate state statute. 

Casper teen Eavan Castaner’s sentence “was legal under Wyoming law,” the high court’s decision states. Further, Castaner had “failed to demonstrate a clear consensus of state legislatures has abandoned the sentencing practice, or that a clear consensus of courts has deemed his sentence to be contrary to the law.”

His sentence, therefore, is “not unusual” under the Wyoming Constitution, the ruling concludes. 

Wyoming is among 28 states today that outlaw life sentences without parole for kids. Castaner didn’t receive a life sentence, but the teen’s attorneys argued that a Natrona County District Court judge gave him an overly harsh punishment for a juvenile offender. The judge did so under a quirk in Wyoming statute that allows minors to potentially receive worse sentences for second-degree murder than for the more severe first-degree murder, the boy’s lawyers argued.

In 2013, the Wyoming Legislature changed statute to ensure a juvenile convicted of first-degree murder, which is punishable by life imprisonment, could have their sentence reduced to a term of years or be eligible for parole after 25 years. That change followed the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Miller v. Alabama, which found that mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole violates constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment. 

Wyoming lawmakers, however, didn’t change the language for second-degree murder, leaving the sentencing range at 20 years to life. 

Though this idiosyncrasy ultimately led to a potentially harsher sentence for Castaner than he might have served for first-degree murder, the state’s high court concludes that the teen’s punishment “falls within the permissible statutory limit set by the Legislature for second-degree murder.” 

Casper attorney Ryan Semerad addresses the jury during a criminal trial in Rawlins in 2023. (Angus M. Thuermer, Jr./WyoFile)

“To apply the statute to a juvenile homicide offender who received a term of years sentence, we would have to ignore the plain language of the statute,” the decision states. 

“We are cognizant of the important doctrine of separation of powers that is implicated when courts engage in statutory interpretation.”

“I understand how the Supreme Court got where it got,” Ryan Semerad, Castaner’s attorney, told WyoFile on Tuesday. “I disagree with it pretty strongly. The decision today I think is wrong, and we are considering filing a petition for rehearing on a few issues.”

Deadly shooting

Castaner admitted last year to shooting and killing his ex-girlfriend, Lene’a Brown, at a park in May 2024. He was 15 at the time, and she was 17. Castaner sent a series of texts to Brown leading up to the shooting, at one point saying he wished her to die “in the most painful way possible.” 

Brown’s father, David Henrickson, buried his daughter, who was Northern Arapaho, on the Wind River Indian Reservation. At Castaner’s sentencing, Henrickson told District Court Judge Dan Forgey, “I scream inside all day long,” according to an article on the hearing by Oil City News.

The state initially charged Castaner with first-degree murder. But Castaner pleaded guilty to the lesser offense of second-degree murder and made a bid for a lower sentence. Semerad, Castaner’s attorney, argued for 22- to 30-years, saying the teen was capable of reform, Oil City News reported

But that approach didn’t pay off. Forgey’s 42- to 75-year sentence for Castaner means the teen could be in his late 50s before he gets his first chance at release. 

The case landed on appeal before the Wyoming Supreme Court, where Castaner’s attorneys maintained he shouldn’t be treated as an adult offender and that mental illness, addiction and other developmental disabilities had played a role in the teen’s case. 

The state, meanwhile, argued that if Castaner behaves well in prison, he could be eligible for parole in 28 years. Kristen Jones of the Wyoming Attorney General’s office also asserted that the defense was asking the court to sign off on a new minimum for juvenile offenders rather than allowing the Legislature to set statute. “That’s a very large piece of legislation for this court to sign,” she said.

The high court ruled Tuesday that Castaner’s sentence doesn’t exceed the penalty for second-degree murder under Wyoming statute, and that state law allowing juveniles a chance at parole after 25 years “applies only to juvenile offenders who received a life sentence,” which Castaner did not. 

“To reach Mr. Castaner’s interpretation, we would have to read additional language into the statute which would be an impermissible overstep by the courts,” the decision states. 

Semerad remains unconvinced.

“By affirming this sentence in the way that they did, a juvenile who is convicted of a lesser crime than first-degree murder could receive functionally and practically a much worse sentence, and we think that’s wrong,” he told WyoFile. 

Asked if he had talked to lawmakers about the statute in question, Semerad said he hadn’t, but that he would “be happy to talk to anyone who could fix this, because it’s wrong.”

Maya Shimizu Harris covers public safety for WyoFile. She was previously a freelance writer and the state politics reporter for the Casper Star-Tribune.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *