The supreme court building in Cheyenne at dusk
The Wyoming Supreme Court building in Cheyenne. (Ana Castro/WyoFile)
Share this:

Most people haven’t seen their local or state judges in action, so how can they decide on election day whether to keep them on the bench?

All Wyoming judges — including Wyoming Supreme Court justices, district court judges and circuit court judges — are originally vetted and recommended by the state’s Judicial Nominating Commission. The governor then selects and appoints jurists from those nominations. Then during the first general election after appointment — and then every eight, six or four years after that, depending on which court they serve on — voters determine whether a judge or justice should be “retained,” i.e. keep their job. 

If fewer than half of voters opt to retain a judge, they lose their seat.

Wyoming has used that nominate-appointment-and-retain system since the ‘70s when a national movement encouraged such policies to make the judiciary less political. 

Retention elections happen during the first general election the year after the governor appoints a judge, and then again if a judge decides they want to keep serving after a term ends. 

Supreme court justices’ terms last eight years, while district and chancery court judges’ terms are six years. Circuit court judges have four-year terms. 

To prepare to make your judicial retention decisions at the polls, it’s helpful to find out in advance who will be on your ballot. You can get a sample ballot from your county clerk’s office, look it up on your local elections website or via vote.org. 

Once you know who you need to evaluate, WyoFile’s Election Guide can link you to the Wyoming Bar Association’s performance assessment of each judge.

That assessment uses feedback from attorneys who’ve sat before each judge over the last few years, evaluating each judge’s knowledge of the law, impartiality and respectfulness, among other things.

For this election, the attorney surveys didn’t rate a single metric of any judge as inadequate. Instead, the compilation of responses ended up with all judges being deemed above adequate or adequate.

Those looking beyond attorney’s opinions may refer to the state’s Code of Judicial Conduct in deciding whether their judge has acted appropriately. 

Some also take age and mental fitness into account. At the Wyoming Supreme Court level, justices must retire by the age of 70, but this rule doesn’t apply for other judges. 

The outcome of retention elections could have far-reaching consequences across the state, ranging from broad topics like abortion to one individual’s life sentence.  

Madelyn Beck reports from Laramie on health and public safety. Before working with WyoFile, she was a public radio journalist reporting for NPR stations across the Mountain West, covering regional issues...

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. As I often bring my ballot to town before election day, I try hard to do homework on the judges and their history/decisions, and this is difficult to do/find/read. I don’t need to be influenced by someone’s opinion, but I would love to read some honest reporting on the facts in September/early October. This is not your responsibility; it’s mine. I’m just spoiled and count on your reporting.

  2. My philosophy on the retention of judges vote is: since they have had their opportunity to serve, it’s time to give someone new a chance, so I invariably vote Nay on their retention. Across the board.
    See how easy that is?

  3. Please clarify if leaving this ballot choice empty – i.e not actually voting Yes or No on a specific judge – is the same as voting No , against retaining that judge.

    The Zen of voting: Not voting is also a vote , in this case No ?

  4. Thanks for sharing how one can assess a judge’s performance from the bench. I need to look into whether my current home state offers anything similar!

  5. The Wyoming system is very similar to the Arizona system. Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor came to Wyoming and spoke to the Wyoming State Bar in Jackson after her retirement from the US Supreme Court. She celebrated and promoted the appointment/retention system that Wyoming and Arizona share. It was a very moving and lively polemic.
    Years later, when I was being sworn into the Supreme Court, after the clerk’s certifications to the Court, each admittee had their name announced by Chief Justice Roberts, saying “[title] [name] shall be admitted.” Great moment.
    And then I noticed that sitting in a secluded corner was Justice O’Connor. It was the far greater moment to then be able to see and nod to her face of justice one last time.

  6. Wyoming Supreme Court and district court judges are required to retire at age 70, but circuit court judges are not subject to this age restriction. An attempt to increase the mandatory retirement age to 75 failed in 2022.