The Sweetwater solar facility is seen through the chain-link security fence. (Hall Sawyer)
Share this:

The Interior Department on Friday finalized its updated Western Solar Plan, potentially opening 31.7 million acres of federal public lands in the West to industrial solar energy development, including some 3.8 million acres in Wyoming.

The decision comes just weeks before President-elect Donald Trump takes office, and just hours before a potential federal government shutdown.

The Wyoming acreage considered suitable for solar energy represents about 20% of land overseen by the Bureau of Land Management in the state, according to the BLM. Suitable areas in Wyoming exclude sage grouse core areas and avoid ungulate migration corridors and unindustrialized areas, according to federal officials. 

The plan updates an effort initiated in 2012, when the federal government under then-President Barack Obama envisioned industrial-scale solar would be concentrated in very high solar potential areas of the southwest. The updated version, however — part of President Joe Biden’s goals to expand renewable energy development to address climate change — expanded the study area to include several more western states, including Wyoming.

This planning map depicts Bureau of Land Management managed areas in Wyoming that may be suitable and unsuitable for industrial-scale solar energy development. (U.S. Bureau of Land Management)

Both the Interior and BLM have insisted that although the plan identifies 31.7 million acres as suitable for development, only about 700,000 acres across the West are “anticipated” to be developed. 

“The larger available area allows for greater flexibility in considering solar proposals,” according to the Interior, which stressed that each solar project will be analyzed individually and include opportunities for public input. 

“With an updated Western Solar Plan, created with extensive input from the public, the Department will ensure the responsible development of solar energy across the West for decades to come,” outgoing Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said in a prepared statement.

Initial reactions

Conservation groups expressed tentative support for the finalized plan hours after the decision was published Friday in the Federal Register.

“The Western Solar Plan will play a crucial role in securing our country’s energy independence and security over the coming decade,” Natural Resources Defense Council Senior Policy Advocate Josh Axelrod said in a prepared statement. “This is a rare piece of policy that can drive job growth, boost rural economies and ensure conservation of fragile environmental resources.”

“To me, it’s a recipe for more litigation and more lawsuits and more people getting upset just because of the free-for-all-nature of it.”

Dustin Mulvaney, San José State University

The updated Western Solar Plan “represents a compromise that will allow Wyoming to continue to innovate and grow its energy economy while protecting our important conservation resources on BLM-managed public lands,” The Nature Conservancy said in a prepared statement.

The conservancy published a study of the Western Solar Plan revision effort in 2023. “There’s an abundance of low-impact spots for the development of solar energy in Wyoming — more than enough to meet market demand,” TNC’s Wyoming Energy Program Director Justin Loyka told WyoFile at the time

But whether federal officials fully embraced input from conservation groups and others wasn’t clear during first-blush readings of the final plan on Friday.

“The plan is just really haphazard,” San José State University Professor of Environmental Studies Dustin Mulvaney told WyoFile. “To me, it’s a recipe for more litigation and more lawsuits and more people getting upset just because of the free-for-all-nature of it.”

This map, provided by The Nature Conservancy, depicts areas where the group, during the Bureau of Land Management’s planning process, noted potential impacts to big game migration corridors and crucial winter habitat. The agency largely addressed those concerns in its final plan, according to The Nature Conservancy. (The Nature Conservancy)

It was unclear, Mulvaney said, whether federal officials fully integrated many innovative strategies tested to avoid negative impacts in sensitive landscapes.

Although Interior officials attempted to correct course — learning from mistakes in past sitings of solar energy development in the southwest — the agency strayed into new, dangerous territory when it expanded its solar energy scope to other western states, according to Mulvaney. 

For example, one criteria it used to essentially disqualify public lands from being off limits to solar development was the presence of invasive plant species such as cheatgrass. Not only does that overlook other landscape values like wildlife habitat connectivity, such invasive plant species typically spread by following other forms of development like wind farms.

“Because of the presence of cheatgrass, it opens up a lot of those landscapes to solar development,” Mulvaney said. “It’s not thinking about questions about, like, ‘Where might we be interrupting migration corridors and [genetic connections]?’ All these things are connected.”

The BLM has approved approximately 33,000 megawatts of clean energy projects on public lands in the West since 2021, according to the agency. By comparison, Wyoming’s total electrical generation capacity — via coal, natural gas, wind, solar and hydroelectric — is about 10,000 megawatts. One megawatt hour can power the average American home for about 1.2 months.

So far, there are two commercial-scale solar energy farms operating in Wyoming: Sweetwater Solar located on mostly BLM lands north of Green River, and Sage Solar located on private land in Lincoln County. South Cheyenne Solar LLC has proposed a 150-megawatt solar farm on private land in Laramie County, and Dinosolar has proposed a 440-megawatt solar facility on private land west of Bar Nunn in Natrona County.

CORRECTION: This story was updated to reflect that the BLM addressed concerns raised by The Nature Conservancy about crucial winter range and migration paths. —Ed

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 26 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy industry in...

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Meanwhile, there are between 2,000 and 8,000 abandoned or orphaned oil and gas wells ( and O/G/ Coalbed Methane produced water wellsites) across Wyoming. At some depth those drillstems pass thru a geothermal ‘hot rock’ strata zone where the temperature is over 350°F. That, folks, is energy at its most fundamental.

    The irony is not lost on me that the Victorian steampunk robber-baron driven fossil fuel industry that has ravaged Wyoming for well over a century and left wreckage and ruin and bankruptcy in its wake might in fact be a pathway to clean limitless power production .

    Let’s start thinking about adding Neo-Steampunk Geothermal electrical generation to the energy mix. Besides, it gives the robber barons and rubythroated blue collared Republicans a reprieve, if not an out. If it shuts them up or leaves them stuttering and sputtering , that’s a win-win.

  2. Switching our reliance to renewable energy is absolutely critical. We are on track to increase our temperatures 13 degrees by 2100. To put that in perspective, our average temperatures are only 5 degrees warmer than during the last ice age. If we don’t address climate change there won’t be any raptors, elk or any other large animals in Wyoming. 90% of the heat created by the increased CO2 in our atmosphere has been absorbed by the oceans, but that buffer is gone now. We have no time left to act.

    1. Better sell your cars, pull out your electric meter, and turn off your gas.
      Nothing leads like example.

    2. Apparently reading data and thermometers is not your strong suit. By the way, solar farms trap heat.

  3. This “plan” is an empty-headed boondoggle. Solar ought be produced where its consumed to reduce grid vulnerability and the vast expense (and waste) of transmission.

  4. This is Criminal. They want to open 20% of our Pristine lands and litter it with black ugly panels all in the name of driving electricity prices up and destabilizing the grid even more? What are we thinking? This along with the windfarms is turning our vast beautiful state into a garbage dump for the big green grift. This is so wrong.

  5. I’m not necessarily against solar, but the new RMP for the Rock Springs area is touted as a win for conservation and yet we are going to put up huge swaths of solar panels in the same general area? And we think that solar will not impact the area? 700,000 acres today, but what about tomorrow? We continue to ignore the ongoing slaughter of birds by wind towers and the so called green energy they create – are we in for more of the same with solar? Seems like the typical government bait and switch