Share this:

GUERNSEY—Laramie and Platte County Republicans gathered Monday evening to select three nominees to fill a vacancy in state Senate District 6 left by Darin Smith, who President Donald Trump nominated as U.S. Attorney for the District of Wyoming in late July.

Out of 10 applicants, GOP precinct committee members nominated Roy Birt of Wheatland, and Jeff Barnes and Taft Love of Cheyenne. 

Senate District 6 encompasses Platte County and a rural swath of northeastern Laramie County, and has been represented by a Republican since 2005. 

While some states fill legislative vacancies via special elections, Wyoming law prescribes a process that starts with the former lawmaker’s political party nominating three candidates and concludes with the district’s county commissioners making the final selection. 

That’s a good thing, according to Wyoming Republican Party Chairman Bryan Miller. 

“I wanted to let everybody know how important this meeting is,” Miller said, standing at the lectern inside Guernsey’s VFW post. 

“Understand that the role that you all here have today replaces an entire special election that could take months,” he said.

Wyoming Republican Chairman Bryan Miller addresses Laramie and Platte County precinct committee members at a meeting in Guernsey on Aug. 25, 2025 to nominate three people to fill a vacancy in Senate District 6. (Maggie Mullen/WyoFile)

Forty-eight GOP committee members showed up to vote — 25 from Laramie County, 23 from Platte County — and were allowed to select up to three candidates on their ballots. 

Ahead of voting, each candidate was given one minute for introductory remarks, five minutes to answer a series of questions and another two minutes to close. Rep. Jeremy Haroldson, R-Wheatland, acted as timer. 

The questions, predetermined by the two counties’ Republican chairs, ranged from abortion and the party’s platform to taxes and the state’s youth exodus. There was little distinction in how the candidates answered. 

With 24 votes, Roy Birt, a retired postal worker, earned the most support. 

Holding the GOP’s platform in one hand and a copy of the state’s constitution autographed by Secretary of State Chuck Gray in the other, Birt thanked the district’s two most recent senators — Smith and Anthony Bouchard. 

“They’re some of the most conservative candidates, most conservative senators that we’ve had in this state,” Birt said. “And I think I can fill those shoes.”

The “family values” reflected in the party’s planks, Birt said, are what matter most to him. 

“A man marries a woman, and they are married,” he said. “That’s the only kind of marriage that should be accepted.”

Birt also called on the GOP to welcome in more people, including working-class voters.

“We’ve seen that Mr. Trump has enlarged the tent, the Republican tent. There’s a lot of people coming in, and I want to see that tent enlarged here,” Birt said. 

Jeff Barnes, who secured 23 votes, began his remarks by making a distinction. 

“I’m a cop. I’m not a politician,” Barnes said.

“So if you’re looking for a politician, you know, you need to look somewhere else,” he said. “I’m not part of the good old boys’ system.”

Barnes unsuccessfully ran for Laramie County sheriff as an independent candidate in 2022 after retiring from a law enforcement career mostly spent in Missouri. When asked if he would support reforming the process for choosing the state’s judges, Barnes got one of the few laughs of the evening. 

“As law enforcement, I’m not a big fan of judges, to be honest with you,” Barnes said. 

“I think the attorney general needs to be elected here in the state of Wyoming,” he said. “And I think judges need to be elected because we don’t know anything about them. They run unopposed. People just say, ‘Fine, let’s just put the same guy or gal in there.’ I think they need to campaign just like the rest of us.”

(In Wyoming, judges are nominated by a nonpartisan panel and appointed by the governor. They do not run for office in the traditional sense. Instead, voters decide whether individual judges should be retained for another term.)

Taft Love, an eastern Laramie County rancher and former county GOP chairman, tied Barnes with 23 votes.

“Government really has just the core responsibilities,” Love said, “We really step outside of our boundaries too much, and so really taking care of the people and the infrastructure that protects the people is the most important part.”

In 2024, Love ran for Senate District 6, placing third out of six candidates in the Republican primary.

Having spent a decade serving on the Laramie County School District 2 Board, Love said education would be a top priority of his as a lawmaker. 

When asked about Wyoming’s economy, Love said he thinks the state should continue to support oil and gas, “but we need to start looking at other ideas and other ways to improve Wyoming.”

At the same time, Love said he was concerned about the effect wind farms have on Wyoming’s landscapes. 

“Our number two industry — tourism. But I’m not sure people are going to come to look at our wind turbines,” he said. 

The Platte and Laramie County commissioners will meet Friday in Cheyenne to appoint one of the three candidates. 

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Can anyone tell if Taft Love is pro private property rights or anti private property rights? It is unclear

    1. And the question is without context. The Republican party is fully intent on forcing their concepts of how people should behave and live, and prohibiting behaviors that they don’t like. It would be better if any of these “public servants” could explain how they will help serve the public at-large, and not, exclusively, a specific subset.