Share this:

Gov. Mark Gordon signed an executive order Tuesday banning campaign contributions in state buildings, bringing the executive branch into an expanding controversy centered on checks handed to lawmakers in the Wyoming Capitol.  

The ban applies to state facilities and commercial buildings where the state leases space, including the Capitol. It does not apply to areas controlled by the Wyoming Legislature, including the Legislative Service Office, committee rooms, and the Senate and House floor, which is where the controversy started last week after a conservative activist was photographed handing checks to lawmakers.

The ban applies to donations made in person by “cash, check, or any other means.” It also applies to online campaign donations when the “solicitation, delivery or acceptance of online donations” originates “within a facility owned or leased by the state.” 

The order went into effect immediately. 

“Our Capitol belongs to the people of Wyoming, and even the appearance of inappropriateness should never be ignored,” Gordon said in a statement. “My duty is to act to ensure the highest level of integrity is enforced for the people of this great state. I am doing so today in the spaces I have control over.” 

The Wyoming Capitol is pictured during the Wyoming Legislature’s 2026 budget session. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The Governor’s Office said the decision followed the recently announced Laramie County Sheriff’s Office investigation into campaign checks that Jacksonite Rebecca Bextel handed out Feb. 9 on the House floor. That happened “while legislation supported by the same conservative political activist was pending before lawmakers,” Gordon said.

“I, like most Wyomingites, believe the House and Senate floors are hallowed places for doing the People’s business, and should never serve as a campaign headquarters,” he said. “Legislators should not be put in the position of being personally approached by lobbyists, activists or others with campaign contributions during the legislative session or when they are working in their official capacities, especially in state-controlled office or meeting spaces.” 

The governor also thanked the Senate for “taking immediate action to prohibit this behavior in their chambers.” 

The Senate Rules Committee, made up of Senate leadership on both sides of the aisle, has convened multiple times in the last week to draft rules banning campaign contributions to senators in the Capitol any time of the year and entirely during the session. On Monday night, the committee unanimously passed a rule to bring before the entire Senate and, on Tuesday, the Senate voted 31-0 to pass the three-part rule. Senators didn’t discuss the rule before the vote.

The Senate rule bans any person from knowingly soliciting, offering, delivering or accepting “by affirmative action” a campaign contribution in the Capitol. It also bars senators from soliciting or accepting a contribution “by affirmative act” while the Senate is in regular or special session.

Senators will now be barred from knowingly accepting checks in person in the Capitol at any time of the year. It also prevents them from knowingly soliciting online campaign donations or throwing fundraisers outside of the Capitol during a legislative session. 

The Senate clarified that the ban will not apply when a senator receives a campaign contribution without knowing about it. For example, the rules would OK a check that arrives in a Senator’s mailbox without them soliciting it or knowing it was coming.

The House, which paused its investigation into the checks pending the criminal inquiry, has not passed any rules about campaign contributions.

Gordon’s executive order will remain in effect until he, as chairman of the State Building Commission, asks the commission to make it permanent.

At a forum in Cody on Monday night, Gordon alluded to plans for the executive order, drawing applause from much of the audience.

In a later interview, Gordon said that he’d been thinking about how to “make it known that probably we should be more respectful of state space.”

“Certainly the optics are embarrassing for Wyoming,” he added. “And, you know, we’re a good state, and we want to make sure that people know our government’s clean and transparent.”

– CJ Baker contributed to this report.

Jasmine Hall covers state government and politics for the Jackson Hole News&Guide after spending two years in Wyoming’s capital. Her roots can be traced back to Appalachia and Michigan State University....

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *