Gov. Dave Freudenthal
Gov. Dave Freudenthal -Photo Courtesy Governor's Office

Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal  is considering an audit of the state’s share of a controversial  federal gas Royalty in Kind program that paid the state $290-million in  fiscal year 2007-08, WyoFile has learned.

According to State Lands and Investments director Lynne Boomgaarden, the governor asked her and Wyoming Department of Audit director Mike Geesey to brief him on options that include both full and partial audits of the federal program to see if the state received market value for its share of natural gas from the Royalty in Kind program begun in 2005.

“Within a week or ten days we expect to go to the governor ,” Boomgarden said in an Aug. 21 telephone interview with WyoFile. Among the issues, she said, are the “political and monetary risks of conducting an audit” and “the nature and scope of the audit if it were conducted.”

In 2005, the Wyoming Board of Land Commissioners  met with then-Minerals Management Service Director Johnnie Burton and agreed to commit its 50 percent share of natural gas royalties to the federal Royalty-i n-Kind program.  The vote was 4-1, with Freudenthal the lone dissenter.

Burton resigned from office in 2007, shortly before the Department of Interior Inspector General reported widespread corruption and unethical behavior in the Colorado-based  Royalty-in-Kind office under her supervision.  The scandal sparked a furor in Congress where several  draft bills have called for the suspension of  Royalty-in-Kind.

Acting on the recommendations of an Minerals Management Service advisory Subcommittee on Royalty Management—which included Wyoming state treasurer  Cynthia Lummis, now Wyoming’s  U.S. representative— the Department of Interior in 2008 discontinued all onshore Royalty-in-Kind oil programs  while continuing RIK for offshore federal leases and for natural gas in Wyoming.

Rone Tempest was a longtime national and foreign correspondent for the Los Angeles Times. In 2004 he was part of a team of reporters to win the Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the massive wildfires in Southern...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *