Entering election season, some Wyoming candidates are embracing President Donald Trump’s hard-line opposition to wind energy, which he has described as “a blight on our country,” while vowing his administration is “going to try and have no windmills built in the United States.”

Republican candidate for Wyoming’s lone U.S. House of Representatives seat and sitting Secretary of State, Chuck Gray, has declared “woke wind is wrong for Wyoming” and that wind turbines “have been terrorizing the landscape for too long.” 

Reid Rasner, also vying for Wyoming’s U.S. House seat, has said, “I stand with President Trump, I oppose windmill expansion and I will fight to make America energy dominant again,” while chiding Gray for past votes in favor of wind energy as State Board of Land commissioner.

To date, there are about 1,500 wind turbines spinning in the state with a generating capacity of approximately 3,700 megawatts — that’s about 25% of Wyoming’s total electrical generation capacity, according to multiple sources compiled by WyoFile. 

This map depicts average annual wind speeds in the U.S. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

What’s yet to come depends on multiple factors, and tracking which projects are moving forward and which have stalled is challenging because there’s no single source or clearinghouse for up-to-date, Wyoming-specific information.

The Trump administration’s order to halt wind project permitting on federal lands has no bearing on development proposed for state and private lands. While there’s much debate at the state and local level about where to locate and, sometimes, whether to permit wind and other utility-scale renewable energy projects at all, it’s hard to size up exactly how much more wind development is on the horizon for Wyoming. 

“We need to improve the process and transparency,” Cheyenne area resident Wendy Volk said.

Patchwork and moving targets

The Wyoming Industrial Siting Council holds a wealth of information, but only regarding qualifying projects: those exceeding $240 million in construction costs and with significant socioeconomic impacts. Landowners and county officials hear from many other developers about potential projects that haven’t yet entered the county, state or federal permitting process. Plus, many of the renewable energy and other industrial projects on the council’s docket continually change in size, scope and timing.

“You have an applicant for a permit and he’s telling the Industrial Siting Council, ‘We’re going to need to delay our project. We might resize our project.’ Or, what they’re not saying is they potentially may never build the project,” Volk told WyoFile.

The council has sent out at least eight public notices so far this year regarding amendments to various projects. The Settler Wind Project in Converse County, for example, was granted a request to change its construction start date from August 2025 to November 2027. The Dinosolar Solar Energy Project in Natrona County was granted a request to reduce the size of the project from 440 megawatts to 240 megawatts and to delay construction from April 2024 to March 2029.

One megawatt is enough electricity to power about 750 homes.

This chart depicts the growth of wind and solar energy in the U.S. (U.S. Energy Information Administration)

It’s not just the siting council that has incomplete and ever-changing information, Volk said. Residents are left to navigate fluctuating planning and permitting processes at the county, state and federal level. Some state-level officials have confided in her, Volk said, that the volume and ever-changing information is overwhelming and difficult to understand. Some have even suggested she generate a comprehensive map of existing and proposed renewable energy projects herself.

“Is that my job?” the real estate agent said. 

Volk recently helped launch a petition that, in part, asks Wyoming officials to pause renewable energy permitting to conduct a “cumulative, landscape-level impact analysis.”

“Wyoming residents expect transparency, accountability and an honest conversation,” Volk continued. “When projects stack up across a region, impacts multiply — even when each project claims compliance in isolation. My biggest concern is transparency. But let’s look at that cumulative impact. And how can you look at the cumulative impact of a 150-mile corridor if you don’t even have a map?”

Inherently arduous

The tangle of multiple authorities, moving targets and changing scope of projects — not to mention market realities like supply chain interruptions — is not a nefarious divide-and-conquer strategy, Power Company of Wyoming Communications Director Kara Choquette told WyoFile.

“There’s just a lot of permitting processes that are difficult to match up with the reality of what it’s like to develop a wind project,” Choquette said. “It’s really hard to predict. The timeframe on all of those permits have to be linked together.”

She pointed to a Wyoming wind energy permitting flow chart on page 84 of this document.

Choquette said she speaks from experience. The $3 billion, 732-mile-long TransWest Express transmission line to bring electricity from Power Company of Wyoming’s Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project in Carbon County to the southwest took some 15 years to permit.

“It’s difficult to permit and develop a big energy project,” Choquette said.

Federal and state officials gathered in Carbon County June 20, 2023, to celebrate the launch of the TransWest Express transmission project. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Further muddying the picture of potential renewable energy development in Wyoming are legal entanglements.

Citing a court ruling, the Wyoming state lands board in February began the process of invalidating two wind leases it had approved last year — one related to the Pronghorn H2 Clean Energy Project in Converse County and one for the Sidewinder Clean Hydrogen Project in Niobrara County.

Before the vote, Wyoming State Auditor Kristi Racines said the board — made up of Wyoming’s top five elected officials — had sometimes whiffed on public notices and failed to give the public a proper platform to engage, referring to a December meeting that didn’t allow for a full discussion between the board and concerned residents.

“And so me, personally,” Racines said, “I am here today to tell you that I apologize. I apologize for the mess that this has become.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *