People who want to ban books never admit that’s their goal, because they know it’s unpopular. It also hypocritically goes against the values of freedom and liberty they publicly claim to cherish and protect.
Opinion
Instead, they often hide their true intent by calling for something that sounds more reasonable: giving parents more control over what books their children read, so innocent young minds are not polluted by obscene material.
But it’s turned out to be a very slippery slope in Cheyenne, one that opponents of a policy change in Laramie County School District 1 last year warned could lead to full-fledged book banning.
Now it’s happening. Cheyenne’s public school system is on the verge of passing the strictest policy in the state against buying books with any passages that meet the vague standard of “sexually explicit” content.
To be clear, these are not books judged under federal or state laws as pornographic or obscene, which are illegal in school library collections.
In several Wyoming communities, including Casper, Gillette, Lander and Sheridan, some members of the public have turned typically staid school board meetings into chaos by clamoring to have all LGBTQ-themed or sex-related books — even textbooks — pulled from shelves.
In Cheyenne, it began when the local chapter of Moms for Liberty, a Florida-based extremist group, demanded Laramie 1’s board of trustees change the “opt-out” policy that allowed parents and guardians to select certain books their children were not allowed to access in school libraries.
It would be replaced by a four-tier system: no access to sexually explicit materials, parent-limited access to such content, open access to all materials, or no access to the library at all.

Despite widespread opposition — about 77% of 1,500 public comments were against the new policy — the board passed it by a 4-2 vote in December. So far about 60% of parents have chosen open access.
Cheyenne attorney George Powers filed a public record request that showed 29 of the first 33 books challenged under the policy were made by one person, the treasurer of Moms for Liberty in Cheyenne. The idea this policy resulted from a groundswell of community support for more parental control over books for kids is laughable. (National data backs this up. The Washington Post performed a nationwide analysis of thousands of book challenges and found that 11 people were responsible for a whopping 60% of challenges in the 2021-2022 school year.)
“The district’s new policy simply gave her a tool to promote the agenda of her national organization,” Powers wrote in a Wyoming Tribune Eagle op-ed.
But Moms for Liberty wasn’t satisfied. In April, the group pressed for another change to the district’s library purchasing policy.
Although no books with explicit sexual material were identified in elementary school libraries, the proposal needlessly states none can be bought. Meanwhile, junior high and high school libraries would be “encouraged” not to buy them. Would they be punished for allegedly violating this unspecified rule?
“This is a book ban, period,” Marcie Kindred of Cheyenne, co-founder of Wyoming Family Alliance for Freedom, told me. She’s absolutely right. Challenged books would simply not be bought.
“If there’s a silver lining, it’s getting people to wake up and realize we have some dishonest politicians at every level,” Kindred said.
If the name of her organization sounds similar to the far-right Wyoming Freedom Caucus, which has proposed House bills to jail librarians who stock books it finds morally offensive, it’s intentional. I’m glad someone finally dared to take defending “freedom” back from a group that tries to censor and restrict others’ views.
Taking stock of the capital city’s school library situation, I wondered what’s happening in Gillette, where anti-LGBTQ censorship gained traction in 2021. Two years later, a new library board with a majority appointed by Campbell County commissioners cowardly fired Terri Lesley, then-director of the county library.
Lesley, whose lawsuit for wrongful termination is pending, suggested anyone challenging a book should follow an established process and put the burden on the board to name books it wants to “weed” from the system, instead of making the staff do it arbitrarily.
“It was just fraught with uncertainty, and an impossible task all the way around,” Lesley told me then. “There are no books to my knowledge in our collection that are obscene. What are they talking about?”
I called Nick Jessen, a 77-year-old retired car salesman who recently made a national splash when HBO’s John Oliver show, “Last Week Tonight,” played a video of him memorably chastising the board before it fired Lesley. Jessen, like the former librarian, is one of my heroes.
“When you start outlawing books because of your personal religious and moral beliefs in this country, you’re going against the Constitution, you’re going against what we were founded for, and you’re personally an affront to me and most of the people I know,” Jessen testified. “This is a shit show, and I’m embarrassed for this board.”
The host had some good-natured fun at Jessen’s expense when his studio audience finished applauding. “Wow! I have to say, usually when I see a white guy with a bushy mustache holding a microphone at a town meeting, you get worried,” Oliver quipped. “But he proved my expectations wrong, so kudos to you, white guy who otherwise I’d assume stormed the Capitol.”
Jessen didn’t take offense because he said Oliver nailed the censorship issue on its head. “These guys who challenge library books don’t even read them,” Jessen noted. “If they’re really worried, they wouldn’t let their kids have cell phones.”
He said the library board still wants books removed without a review, but so far the new director has resisted.
Jessen, a lifelong Republican, said Wyoming politics remains a “shit show.” He will spend the summer campaigning against candidates who support banning books. He doesn’t think the Freedom Caucus represents the prevailing attitude in Campbell County, though its members keep getting elected to the Legislature.
“There are two or three people with big [church] congregations, and they get people out to vote,” Jessen said. “But we have to get religion out of politics.”
Kindred said she also plans to campaign this summer, backing a slate of candidates running against Moms for Liberty members. She said the Wyoming Family Alliance for Freedom already had a victory in a “coffee war” last week.
Moms for Liberty asked a coffee shop to co-sponsor an event to give Cheyenne teachers a free coffee. Kindred said when the group announced the event on Facebook, the community’s reaction was swift and negative.
Teachers called the coffee franchise owner to complain and educate her about what Moms for Liberty stands for, Kindred explained. The owner backtracked, pulled the plug on the joint venture and decided to host it by herself.
Kindred said it was a good lesson for their rival.
“Educators, librarians, everyone was like, ‘What? You’re going to buy us coffee after you’ve been calling us pedophiles for the past two years!” she exclaimed.
Not wasting the opportunity to score some political points of its own, the Wyoming Family Alliance for Freedom joined forces with another shop to offer free coffee to teachers.
Meantime, the public has until Thursday to comment on the proposed changes to Laramie 1’s book policy. The school board is scheduled to make its final decision on June 3.
Kindred lamented that the library book issue was manufactured by a national group that doesn’t understand Wyoming values.
“Our biggest concern with high school is to get students to pick up a book,” she said. “What Moms for Liberty does is such lunacy.”
It’s a waste of time. Time that Kindred rightfully says “should be spent on actual things, like literacy and graduation rates. Our real problem is that our kids aren’t even going to high school libraries.”


Look up Bridget Ziegler.
Mr. Drake
I am really sorry that you have to continually deal with the Whacko free dumb caucus people. Maybe someday you can go back writing opinions about true republicans from Wyoming or the United States.
Book banning and or burning in any situation is wrong. They talk about freedom of speech and then they want to take it away.
If they are so concerned about sexually explicit materials then they better ban all cell phones in school.( a comedian I watched called it porn in your pocket) Parents should not let their kids have cell phones until they are least 16. Let’s just ban cell phones all together. Let’s burn cell phones.
I am guessing these moms for liberty don’t pay enough attention to their own children as the are out fighting stupid ideas as opposed to teaching their children what is right and what is wrong
The world as we knew it is no more🤬
Liberty means freedom. Your (household) freedom may not equal mine. My 92-year-old mother told me, when I asked her why she didn’t censor my books when I was younger, “How can you learn the difference between literature and garbage unless you read both?” She was and is correct. Freedom (Liberty) means not restricting access to allowable literature. Parents can decide, not libraries. “Offensive” literature opens the door ti conversations, but that’s not what these Moms want. They want obedience to the unquestioned norm.
If parents want their children reading morally questionable material they are free to purchase it with their own money. It doesn’t belong in taxpayer funded government schools.
And who gets to decide what is “morally questionable material”?
Umm… parents? Isn’t that what is being said?
Pretty sure he was referring to the available books in schools, but you do you.
Religion out of politics?? Look at the founding fathers who wrote the Constitution. Look at our money… Seems like every dollar I have says “IN GOD WE TRUST”. TAKE RELIGION OUT, LEAVE JESUS IN!
The division of church and state has existed since the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were written.
President Dwight Eisenhower signed into law a bill that required “In God We Trust” to be printed on all coin and paper currency. On July 11, 1955, Congress passed H.R. 619, which mandated “In God We Trust” to be included on all U.S. currency. It was never there before. I suspect the founding fathers all rolled over in their graves over this.
So you are incorrect about that and many other things.
The mommy liberty lies are an import from out of state. You appear to enjoy outside interference, carpetbaggers and the attempt to squash our freedoms and our Wyoming lifestyle. Perhaps you need to stop listening to whomever has your ear and get up and do some actual research. Freedom has a price. They are removing our rights one lie after another .
@Sheryl Yates, That is false. The motto on US currency dates back to at least 1864. Looks like you should take your own advice and “stop listening to whomever has your ear and get up and do some actual research.”
Excellent breakdown of the current situation. However, as long as republicans keep just voting for their brand instead of what is right, and democrats fear running, it will just get worse.
Funny how outfits with “Liberty” or “Freedom” in their names never have other peoples freedom or liberty in mind.
Certainly taxpayers need to provide school books for kids, but can anyone explain why it is necessary to teach them porn? Is there a purpose other than trying to excite them? There is a lot that needs to be learned, but is porn really at the top of the list or even on the list of necessities? We constantly hear that schools need more money, yet they want to spend what they get on teaching sex/pornography to kids?
Amen sister. Not much difference between sex pictures in books that are real close to porn
You mention porn. Would you give me a definition of porn, please?
How many of any of these materials have you read? I venture to say, none. Better look into how removing books that encourage independent thinking and analysis to gain control is part of their objective. You are being scammed.
100%
Please give me an example of porn. As a former principal in LCSD1 I can tell you that we had very good people working in our libraries an they followed very strict guidelines of what was age appropriate for materials. I bet you will pick obscure segments taken out of context that will “prove” your point. Also, my guess is that you have not read the entire book of any of the “pornographic” novels so you can cherry pick rather than understand the overarching theme and message of the book. Please leave the selection of reading materials for my children up to me and their ability to get them in our public school libraries.
There has been no larger cohort that has had their sexuality repressed than women. The use of the word porn denigrates one of best ways to get some exercise and release tension. If parents stopped lying to their children, especially to our female citizens, then the world would be a great deal better.
If we as a society did not repress the discussions of our differences in sexual nature, there would be far less issues for young men and women. I have some belief that there would be less Mean Girls and less confusion by young men if we talked more about sex.
Start with the discussion of Periods and once this bar is met, the rest is easy…
https://www.npr.org/2023/12/06/1197959131/breaking-the-menstruation-taboo
Mr. Jessen’s quote, “If they’re really worried, they wouldn’t let their kids have cell phones” really stands out. Do parents even realize how easy it is to access sexual content online and that it’s not usually the healthy kind? Young people need guidance now more than ever to navigate sexual issues in this climate of too much information. They need thoughtful books, teachers, and curriculums to guide them in understanding biological sex, natural feelings, reproductive health, relationships etc. Teachers and Librarians are heroes not enemies and should be able to do their work without interference from groups of misguided religious bullies.
Diana, parents can use software on smartphones to protect their children from pornographic material. Many often opt for “lite” or “dumb” cellphones. To suggest that parents who allow their children to use cellphone have no right to object to inappropriate library materials is absurd. You paint your interlocutors with a very broad brush and in demeaning terms when you style them “misguided religious bullies”. Is it possible that they are also good people who have different experiences and priorities, who are worthy of respect and measured rhetoric?
Have you been in a college classroom lately? Far and wide, students are not being encouraged to think critically. Instead of spending tax payers money to make universities “free”, maybe we should focus on providing students with a sound foundation in history, civics, and logic (among other things) in our secondary schools. By thrusting more and more students into our universities we are unnecessarily creating educational and monetary inflation, wherein more entry-level jobs require a college education and the costs adjacent to a university education skyrocket.
This is why higher education should be free for all. Without an educated population, we will keep fighting the same battles from generation to generation. Most of today’s issues were already examined and decided, but due to a faction of uneducated and uninformed people who have been indoctrinated by their religious beliefs, we are having to go through it all over again. Education doesn’t always mean college, but at least college encourages critical thinking.
” The people who want to ban books are never the good guys…”.
I first heard that over 50 years ago. It was true then, and could not be more truthful now.
Our whole political system is corrupt. A past president that was voted out of office has control of the cowardly republican party. A corrupt Supreme Court. A justice system that favors the wealthy, religious organizations that think they can force everyone to adhere to their myths and legends. Organizations that name themselves with deceptive titles are commonplace. In Wyoming, we have three members of congress that kowtow to the orange menace, and are election deniers.
“But Moms for Liberty wasn’t satisfied.”
They were not satisfied in Florida either resulting in multiple partner parties to make up for that lack of attention. Repression due to religious beliefs seem to make people miserable and then because they are miserable decide to take their misery out on others.
I would like to congratulate Nick Jessen for pointing out that the church is helping to elect the worst possible candidates to office. The tax exempt bully pulpit inhabited by those that lead the sheep astray needs much more scrutiny by the media as many christians/citizens would be shocked to find the perverted interpretations of the good book and our Constitution foisted on their flocks.
We need more like Nick Jessen to stand up and speak out. These book banning crazies are a danger the principles set forth in the Constitution.
It isn’t about ” banning” anything. Government schools need to stay in their lane and focus on ACADEMICS.
If families want sex education to be in the home it is their right. We are not required to ” co-parent” with government!!