Share this:

This story was updated with comments from Kappa Kappa Gamma’s national organization at 10:50 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 26. —Ed.

The six sorority sisters who sued the University of Wyoming’s Kappa Kappa Gamma earlier this year for admitting a transgender member filed notice Monday stating they will appeal the dismissal of their federal civil suit. 

The plaintiffs, however, will not pursue any claims against Artemis Langford, the transgender woman and UW student at the center of the suit, according to the filing.  

While Monday marked the deadline for a notice of appeal, it could take weeks before the plaintiffs file the actual appeal in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver. 

Langford became the first openly transgender sorority member in UW history last fall when she was admitted by a vote of the local chapter’s membership. In March, members Jaylyn Westernbroek, Hannah Holtmeier, Allison Coghan, Grace Choate, Madeline Ramar and Megan Kosar sued Langford, Kappa Kappa Gamma’s parent organization and its national president. 

The plaintiffs, who originally sought anonymity in their suit, claimed the private organization broke its bylaws, breached housing contracts and misled members by admitting Langford. They asked the court to void her membership in addition to prohibiting “any other man” from joining the sorority, plus monetary and punitive damages from the organization. 

U.S. District Court Judge Alan B. Johnson dismissed the complaint last month, ruling that the court cannot interfere with how the sorority determines its membership since it’s a private, voluntary organization. 

The ruling was “without prejudice,” which left the plaintiffs the option to refile. Johnson, however, advised the plaintiffs to “devote more than 6% of their complaint to their legal claims against the defendants,” should they choose to restart litigation. Much of the 72-page complaint was devoted to accusing Langford of “inappropriate” behavior and said her attraction to women made her “more threatening.” Those allegations were “unbefitting in federal court,” according to Johnson’s ruling.

Instead, the plaintiffs are choosing to appeal. The appeals notice does not explain the grounds for the appeal. That’s expected to come later.

A representative for the sorority said the organization expects Johnson’s ruling will survive the appeals process.

“Kappa Kappa Gamma applauds the court’s ruling in Wyoming upholding a private organization’s right to choose their members,” a spokesperson for the national organization told WyoFile in a statement. “In this case, a federal judge carefully examined every aspect of the plaintiffs’ allegations and ruled to dismiss this case. We are confident the judge’s thoughtful and decisive ruling in this matter will be upheld.”

Cassie Craven and John Knepper, attorneys for the plaintiffs, did not respond immediately to WyoFile’s request for comment. Nor did Rachel Berkness, the attorney representing Langford.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. It appears that these sorority members and, of course, the attorneys are motivated by money and attention. They selfishly do not have the Sorority’s best interest in mind. The girl is not living in the house. There isn’t a 60 member organization that doesn’t have problems. They need to either stop their selfish and spoiled demands or leave the organization. I’m an alum and sorority sister who is tired of people’s narcissistic and opportunistic behavior.

    Reply