POST Director Chris Walsh (left) and Wyoming Association of Sheriffs and Chiefs of Police Executive Director Allen Thompson (right) testify to the Legislature’s Joint Judiciary Committee Nov. 6, 2023. (screenshot)
Share this:

It’s been five years since former Albany County sheriff’s deputy Derek Colling shot and killed Laramie-resident Robbie Ramirez. Yet, because of ambiguities in state law, the agency that certifies police officers in Wyoming still hasn’t been able to access Colling’s personnel records or complete its investigation of his fitness to serve.

The Legislature’s Joint Judiciary Committee endorsed a bill Tuesday that would authorize the Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission to access the personnel records it says are needed to thoroughly review police misconduct allegations. 

The problem 

Ramirez, who was unarmed and living with mental illness, was the third person Colling killed on duty. While serving with the Las Vegas Police Department, Colling shot two people — both shootings were later deemed justified — and was fired for beating a third. He then returned to his hometown of Laramie to join the Albany County Sheriff’s Office. 

Protesters hold signs in front of Albany County Courthouse on Nov. 4, 2019, to mark the one-year anniversary of the shooting of Robbie Ramirez by Albany County Sheriff’s Deputy Derek Colling. Ramirez was the third person Colling shot and killed. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

Many wondered why, given his track record, he was able to wear a badge and gun in Wyoming. 

In the wake of Ramirez’s Nov. 4, 2018 killing, POST — the state agency responsible for training, certifying and decertifying law enforcement in Wyoming — received seven complaints, 14 letters and 2,608 signatures in favor of Colling’s decertification, records show. 

Colling resigned from the Albany County Sheriff’s Office in 2021, but a decertification by POST would disqualify him from future law enforcement work in Wyoming.

POST’s ability to thoroughly investigate Colling hit a brick wall when Albany County refused to release his personnel records to the agency, Director Chris Walsh explained to the judiciary committee. While not unique to Albany County — three out of the seven requests for records Walsh has made since 2019 have been rejected — the effort to get Colling’s files highlighted how ambiguity in Wyoming statute limited POST’s authority to obtain records.  

“It is difficult at times to be the one that’s responsible to ensure that people are hired properly and maintain employment properly when you don’t necessarily get the access to the records,” Walsh, a former police officer himself, told the committee Monday. Access to personnel records “could prove or disprove allegations in an investigation against an officer,” he said.  

After the Albany County Sheriff’s Office refused to honor POST’s requests for Colling’s personnel records, the matter went to court. On Aug. 25, Judge Misha Westby, of the district court in Albany County, denied POST’s request for Colling’s personnel files. 

Westby concluded that the Wyoming Public Records Act provides grounds to deny access to personnel files, as well as medical, psychological and sociological data, and that nowhere in state statute is there an exception granting POST access to this information for investigatory purposes. 

The fix

The judiciary committee’s draft bill — Peace officers records and reporting — intends to address the statutory shortcoming Westby identified. 

Last session, a similar bill, co-sponsored by Sen. Cale Case (R-Lander) and Reps. Art Washut (R-Casper) and Karlee Provenza (D-Albany), died before making it to the House floor for debate. 

This year’s version more clearly defines that POST shall be granted access to police personnel records for “purposes of investigating or determining a peace officer’s initial certification, continuing certification, suspension, revocation or termination,” and specifies agencies must fulfill requests within 30 days. Unfulfilled requests will trigger district court intervention. 

The draft bill, which passed the Joint Judiciary Committee unanimously Monday, will be considered during the upcoming 2024 legislative session beginning Feb. 12. 

Tennessee Jane Watson is WyoFile's deputy managing editor. She was a 2020 Nieman Abrams Fellow for Local Investigative Journalism and Wyoming Public Radio's education reporter. She lives in Laramie. Contact...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *