Share this:

Wyoming voters on Tuesday approved a constitutional amendment to segregate residential real estate from other forms of property for taxation purposes. 

Set into motion by lawmakers in 2023, about 54% of voters supported a measure to recategorize property-tax classes, according to unofficial results from the Wyoming Secretary of State’s office. 

Until now, the Wyoming Constitution grouped residential with commercial and agricultural property. That’s made it difficult for lawmakers to respond to surging home values in much of the state with changes that only addressed how homes are taxed. Instead, lawmakers have relied on more short-term fixes, including expanding the state’s property tax refund program, creating new exemptions for certain homeowners and boosting an existing exemption for veterans. 

With the success of the amendment, lawmakers will have one fewer constraint to contend with. What exactly the Legislature does next remains to be seen, but the measure also grants them the option to create a subclass for owner-occupied, primary residences. 

The legislation that put the amendment before voters on the general election ballot received the requisite two-thirds support in both the House and the Senate. But even some of those who voted in favor of it expressed concern that it would open the door to higher taxes. Other opponents held that the amendment would create an unfair and unnecessarily complex system for taxpayers. 

Supporters, meanwhile, argued that it would enable the Legislature to address property taxes without starving essential public services — property taxes fund education and local governments. 

Support for the amendment saw significant financial backing from a political action committee tied to a statewide realtors group. According to campaign finance records, the 4 Wyoming PAC spent more than $544,000 on advertising since late September — an extraordinary amount of money for Wyoming elections in a short period of time. 

The measure is the 14th amendment to the Wyoming Constitution approved by voters since 2000.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. It is now time for the members of the Wyoming Legislature to deal with this issue, to set aside their differences and do the hard work of governing. If the factions in the legislature remain polarized and continue to display the animosity that has prevailed in recent sessions, a long-term property tax solution will not happen. Homeowners need tax relief, local governments and schools need a revenue source to make up shortfalls that may result. I believe that consumption taxes need to be studied. Tourists and others who use our roads and infrastructure to travel through Wyoming should pay a much larger share of our state budget and homeowners need tax relief. The ball is in your court, Wyoming Legislature. Pull together and come up with a solution.

  2. if you want to attract retirees to the state lower property taxes are a big draw . retirees have money to spend that will create job creation and a broader tax base

  3. The legislature could also lower taxes on commercial properties to further entice the Amazons, Microsofts, etc., to bring more facilities into the state.

    A sub-class for second homes also seems likely, so look for tax rates on second homes and cabins to be higher than they are currently.

    It’ll certainly be interesting to see how the Freedom Caucus, who recently decided they didn’t want the power to make these changes after helping to get them on the ballot, will respond to voters that think they just voted themselves a tax cut.