Opinion

When I was a kid, I never thought much about an allowance. I knew my parents had a hard time getting by, so they didn’t have any spare change for me. I also knew my father, under the thumb of his bosses at work, was in charge at home. If I needed money, I had to ask. Usually he said no, and that was that.

As parents, we gave our daughter an allowance, believing it was a way to help her learn to make decisions and live with them. The money wasn’t tied to specific chores — if you clean your room, you can have a cookie; if you help with the yard work, you’ll get 50 cents; if you’re polite to your cranky auntie, we’ll slip a dollar your way. We wanted to avoid teaching bribery as the way of the world.

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary’s first definition of bribe is, “money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust.” Stopped by the highway patrol, the driver attempted to bribe the officer to avoid getting a speeding ticket. The father bribed his daughter with candy to finish her homework.

At the recent Republican National Committee’s midterm convention, President Trump pledged to give $5,000 to each of the nation’s 270 million adult citizens if Republicans keep control of both the House and Senate in the upcoming elections. The president called his pledge a “Trump dividend” to be given as a result of the administration’s “tremendous economic success.” He compared it to the cash dividends corporations pay to shareholders. As if being a citizen is being a shareholder and as if the nation is a corporation. He also noted that the $5,000 could only be spent within the country. How you gonna police that one?

It’s estimated that the total of the $5,000 payments would add up to about $1.2 trillion. Where would that money come from? The president has said there’d be no need to use tax funds, that some of the money could come from the $100,000 fee he’s demanding of visa applicants and some from the profits from tariffs. He claimed the country has taken in “trillions of dollars in tariffs and other things.”

Treasury Department data cited by the Bipartisan Policy Center shows that tariffs have provided about $341 billion in net revenue, $166 billion of which the Supreme Court has ordered to be refunded. The remaining $175 billion is 14.6% of the $1.2 trillion needed to pay us each $5,000.

George Washington University law professor Paul Berman has commented that even if there were enough tariff revenue to cover the cost, “that’s money that goes back to the public fisc,” that is, back to the total pool of money the government holds and manages. Brennan emphasized that the president can’t unilaterally make such payments, as Congress holds the power to appropriate funds. The executive branch can’t spend public money without approval from Congress. 

While many commentators have weighed in on the president’s proposal, few have said out loud what the proposal is — a bribe. In offering each adult citizen $5,000 if Republicans maintain control of Congress in the upcoming elections, the president has made what is typically understood as the classic form of bribery — the payment of money or anything of value or the offer of such payment in exchange for casting or withholding a vote. By federal law, such a promise or payment is illegal.

State law also prohibits bribery. Title 6, Chapter 5, Article 1, Section 6-5-102 of the Wyoming statutes states that a person commits bribery if, “He offers, confers or agrees to confer any pecuniary benefit, testimonial, privilege or personal advantage upon a public servant as consideration for the public servant’s vote, exercise of discretion or other action in his official capacity; or, while a public servant, he solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit, testimonial, privilege or personal advantage upon an agreement or understanding that his vote, exercise of discretion or other action as a public servant will thereby be influenced.”

We commonly think of an individual bribing an elected official — a public servant. But President Trump’s proposal turns things upside down. He is the individual offering the bribe, and we are all public servants sworn in our official capacity to uphold democracy. As such, we must not sell our votes.

In Wyoming, the punishment for a bribery conviction is imprisonment for not more than 10 years, a fine of not more than $5,000, or both. If convicted, I can use the president’s $5,000 check to pay my $5,000 fine. The prison time’s another matter.

After 10 years teaching in Artist-in-Schools programs throughout the western United States, David Romtvedt served for 22 years as a professor at the University of Wyoming.

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Of all the great Orange Turd’s crimes, sins, ethical offenses, faux pas’, and exercises in bad taste, this one rates on the lesser end. Technically yes, it probably does constitute an attempted bribe, but is it significantly more blatant of a bribe than a candidate promising to cut your income taxes, or closer to home, promising to eliminate your income taxes? I think not.

  2. The saddest part of all of this is the GOP will scream and stomp their feet when the midterms are over and democrats start holding some of them accountable for their actions. And they will use their political spin to claim democrats did it first. So much for the party of law and order.

    1. A stimulus check because the economy was at a standstill is not the same as a payout to vote republican…

      Your comparison isn’t valid and neither is your support for chrump

    2. Carla, yes how soon everyone forgets. “COVID-19 stimulus checks were issued to provide direct financial relief to American households and stabilize the economy during pandemic-related shutdowns” and the first checks were issued during the Trump administration, they were not issued with a direct statement to vote Republican.
      Nor did anyone say ” pretend please that I’m on the ballot”
      The fact that we have 2 more years of his egotistical rants is mind boggling.

    3. There was no stipulation that to receive Covid money that a particular political party or candidate must win an election. Remember, the first Covid payments were issued by Trump’s administration. Trump clearly stated that this money is dependent on Republicans winning in November. There is no equivalence. How easily you do not understand.

    4. Apples to oranges. The American Rescue Plan of 2021 was an economic stimulus plan that was approved by congress not something that was thrown out there by the president. It wasn’t predicated on if you give me something (vote for me and my party) I’ll give you something (money), it was a stimulus for everyone who made less than $75k when the worldwide economy was in the tank. Taxpayers whose income exceeded certain amounts ($80K for individuals, $120k for single parents, and $160k for households) received no stimulus payments. Maybe we all don’t forget.

    5. Do you really not see the difference between funding approved by Congress to speed up the recovery from the Covid pandemic and Trump offering to pay you money if you reelect Republicans? Dividend? BS, the U’S. Treasury is not a corporate stock plan. It is plain and simple a bribe to get Republicans elected. Even a high school government student can see that. The only thing that will protect the voters from prosecution is the fact that just like all the other cash he has promised you, he’ll never pay it.

      1. You stepped square into that one Carla. Covid was real and killed a lot of people. This is a straight up bribe by the “president” of the United States in a feeble attempt to stay in power a little longer. By the responses to your opinion no one has forgotten anything.
        Another good opinion piece Dave. Thank you.

  3. If I received the check, I would take it – and, having voted against the horrible candidates he touted, have a good defense against any charge of bribery. I’d need it, because the checks would kindle yet more inflation (as the ill-advised COVID checks did). Trump himself would hopefully be impeached, having committed another high crime and misdemeanor by sending them out without a Congressional appropriation.

  4. Trump is the closest thing to a Mafia man that I’ve ever seen. Unfortunately, there are many that would vote for the $5000. The proof is the people that voted for this clown three times.

  5. What is sad is that Wyoming’s representatives have been covering for this corrupt president since day one and have gone along with him, destroying not only our country but our constitution. Wyoming elected officials are complicit and should be removed from office along with this corrupt President. He has constantly said bad things about this great nation and its people. Has sided with our adversaries and has alienated our allies. Wyoming needs to quit voting for poorly educated people. But there again, the president has always said he loves the poorly educated