Share this:

Wind farm operators in Wyoming and across the nation can now bury decommissioned wind turbine blades and other materials at surface coal mines in the state — a solution of mutual benefit to both industries, and especially local landfills, state officials say.

The federal Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation and Enforcement on Monday issued a final rule approving “the repurposing of inert, decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers” at surface coal mines in the state. The rule helps address an ongoing concern that turbine blades — which are frequently replaced with new ones — take up too much space at local landfills.

While those landfills typically earn fees to take on the materials, many worry the scores of wind fins and discarded towers might prematurely push landfills to their limits. A single blade would block two-way traffic if deposited on a street in downtown Casper.

The Eagle Butte coal mine just north of Gillette in July 2024. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile, courtesy EcoFlight)

“Repurposing these blades and towers as backfill as part of a reclamation plan was a novel answer for both the coal industry that needed backfill to accelerate final reclamation and for the wind industry that needed disposal answers,” former Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Land Quality Division Administrator Kyle Wendtland, who led the state’s rulemaking effort before moving on to the Wyoming Energy Authority, said in a prepared statement.

Simply put, surface coal mines in Wyoming have much bigger holes to fill than the average municipal landfill. 

A typical coal mine in the southern Powder River Basin, for example, digs hundreds of feet down before it reaches coal, and those coal seams can be 50 feet thick. With the coal removed, there are big holes to fill and plenty of room for non-toxic materials, rule proponents say. The mining region is home to the biggest earth-moving industries in the world when it comes to digging and refilling holes — a prime opportunity to dispose of industrial waste such as wind turbine blades.

These discarded wind turbine blades were pictured at the Casper Regional Landfill in 2019. (Brendan LaChance/Oil City News)

The coal mines are already permitted to bury some of their own inert industrial waste on-site, and they can take on more, according to state and federal regulators. When a tornado struck the nearby mining town of Wright in 2005, mines won quick approval from state regulators to bury debris from the devastation.

“Options to dispose of blades and towers are limited,” Wyoming DEQ Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Administrator Suzanne Engels, said in a prepared statement. “Landfilling the retired blades and towers is unsustainable due to land limitations that are needed for communities’ waste.”

Stockpiling decommissioned blades, as a proposed alternative by some in the industry, “is an eyesore and problematic for the environment,” Engels added.

Borne on two flatbed rail cars each, wind turbine blades pass through the historic coal mining town of Rock Springs in March, 2019. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

Burying wind blades and other permitted wind energy materials can benefit coal mines by helping to speed up the reclamation process of backfilling pits, Wendtland said. Mines are also allowed to charge a fee, with 25% of the receipts sent to the state. There are no parameters around what coal mines might charge for disposal, he added.

“Not only can we handle Wyoming’s waste stream off of wind, we can handle a national level waste stream off of wind and do it responsibly,” Wendtland said.

The Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation and Enforcement, which has federal oversight of surface coal mine reclamation, worked closely with Wyoming DEQ to develop the updated rule. The action was spurred by a Wyoming law passed in 2020 — House Bill 129, “Reclamation of surface coal mines-turbine blades.” The federal agency noted that it asked for public comment regarding the rule change and did not receive any.

The wind energy industry, in recent years, has taken steps to address its waste issue by moving away from certain composite materials that are costly to recycle, according to the American Clean Power Association, a renewable industry trade group. Today, about 90% of wind blades in the U.S. are recyclable, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. 

The waste issue is still on the minds of lawmakers in Wyoming, however. 

House Bill 89, “Wind turbine blades-onsite disposal required,” sponsored by Rep. J.R. Riggins (R-Casper), would require “disposal of decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers on the site where the wind turbines operated.” The measure, however, would still allow for disposal at surface coal mines, Riggins told WyoFile.

Though he was unsure of whether federal approval for burial at Wyoming coal mines would come to fruition when drafting HB 89, Riggins said he wanted to ensure that wind energy developers have a disposal plan that doesn’t burden municipal landfills in the state — even if that burden falls on the private property owners who lease to wind energy developers. The landfill that serves Casper received international attention for storing hundreds of wind turbines.

Wind energy companies primarily target privately owned lands to avoid myriad federal permitting reviews.

“I’m putting the burden on the site owners and on the operating companies,” Riggins said. “That was the purpose of it. And I know they won’t like it. So give me a better plan … without Wyoming taxpayers bearing any of that burden.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 26 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy industry in...

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Brilliant! Not. We are not allowed to put coal ash back into most mines because of concentrated elements that came out of the same mine. CCR rules. So now let’s dump in elements that were never there in the first place. Not only have we destroyed thousands of acres of view scapes for ever with those things, now we are going to ruin the land underneath.

    1. But it’s under the guise of green energy. Which, apparently, is the most important thing.

      Seems contradictory. At the least.

  2. Best use for abandoned coal mines I can think of. The coal industry can partially mitigate part of it’s environmental damage.

  3. In Wyoming, pore space is owned by the surface owner for carbon sequestration or other subsurface storage. What input does the surface owner have on these new proposed waste landfills?

  4. Tall skyscrapers require footings hundreds of feet deep. Drop the towers in vertically then fill with concrete as a footing. Each building will need multiples.

    A giant art sculpture made of wind towers, or just buried on private property could also serve as a number of captive analog reverb chambers tied into phone lines/internet so recording studios globally could rent or subscribe for high quality, adjustable, natural reverb chamber time .

    3 or 4 towers laid horizontally across streams or rivers could also be repurposed as the base for limited weight bridges in municipalities with old, rusty infrastructure on county roads.

    Old towers can also be used in road construction as under-the-road passageways for wildlife like deer, elk, bears or anything else often found dead on the side of the road.

    Cut towers into 20 ft. long sections and put doors on each end with a separation wall at the 10 ft. mark. Additional work & money could turn these into fast, cheap, basic shelter for those on the streets.

    1. Bill. Unfortunately these materials are not structurally designed for any of the purposes you suggested. Culverts have ribs or ridges built into them to give strength when buried. The blades are not built to hold weight as you suggested. They are nothing but balsa wood covered with fiberglass/rosins. So none of your ideas are sound. The blades only last aprox 8-10 years before they need to be changed out.

  5. 50 years from now, this will be the superfund sights. Lobbyists for the power companies are all in, I’m sure. Thousands and thousands of tons of waste buried into the earth. After all. Out of sight. Out of mind. These wind turbines are being updated every 6 to 10 years. Take all this waste, and megawatts it generated, and compare it to a nuke which would have generated around 1/3 a rail car of waste. If that. Is anyone else losing their minds over the rampant stupidity in our government today?

  6. Two outfits in Iowa & one in Missouri shred used turbine blades & mix them with concrete to make stronger cement.
    Google it.

  7. Why is this a Wyoming problem. They were manufactured in another state and owned by a corporation. Let them deal with their trash.