The state’s new program was slated to start releasing funds to families for private or home schooling on July 1, 2025. (MissMessie/FlickrCC)
Share this:

Applications for Wyoming’s new education savings accounts are slated to open Jan. 1, meaning income-qualified families can receive $6,000 per student as early as the 2025-26 school year for private school or homeschooling expenses. 

The state education department is seeking public comment now on proposed rules to guide the process of determining what costs qualify for the state funds and how the program will be administered. Comments are due Dec. 11.

The rules establish how families must apply for the funds, how parents get reimbursed and how an education service such as a private school obtains certification to participate as a qualified provider. 

The public can provide comments via this online form.

A controversial measure

The program will provide $6,000 annually to support the educational expenses of students enrolled in private schools and homeschooling. Students ages 4 and older who are in preschool through grade 12, and come from a family with a household income below 150% of the federal poverty guidelines (approximately $46,800 for a family of four), are eligible to apply. Acceptable costs include private school tuition, tutoring, textbooks, school uniforms and online courses.

Its origins can be found in a school-choice effort in the state, but the ESA program traveled a rocky path. The measure was transformed, killed, revived, amended scores of times, passed by the Legislature, and then partially vetoed by Gov. Mark Gordon in March before finally becoming law. The tug-of-war reflected the different outcomes advocates hoped the bill would achieve: early childhood education for some, broad access to non-public-school for others.

Preschooler Evelyn Cole views the eclipse with classmates on April 8, 2024 at Academy of the Winds, a private Montessori school in Lander. (Katie Klingsporn/WyoFile)

Lawmakers supporting the latter advocated for a “universal school-choice” program — open to any family regardless of income. But many doubt that proposal’s constitutionality. Gordon cited that concern when he vetoed parts of the bill to narrow eligibility before allowing it to become law, pointing explicitly to the Wyoming Constitution’s prohibition on the state giving money to individuals “except for the necessary support of the poor.” 

The current iteration may not be the last one. Pro-school-choice lawmakers voiced interest over the summer in tweaking the bill again to broaden eligibility. 

Proposed rules

The rules would provide the framework for the program. They do things such as:

  • Stipulate that parents submit federal tax documents when applying.
  • Establish rules for how parents spend money they submit for reimbursement.
  • Develop guidelines for education service providers to meet in order to qualify for expenses. 
  • Provide protocol for investigating and penalizing the misuse or misappropriation of funds. 
  • Mandate that school districts allow ESA students to participate in statewide standardized testing alongside public school students.

Katie Klingsporn reports on outdoor recreation, public lands, education and general news for WyoFile. She’s been a journalist and editor covering the American West for 20 years. Her freelance work has...

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. That whole program is objectionable and should have been vetoed in its entirety.
    Public schools and teacher salaries in WY are underfunded, yet somehow this brilliant legislature thinks providing subsidies for private education and home schooling is going to upgrade the educational outcomes of WY students. OH forgot outcomes are not the issue…its outflows of educational money, but not to the school system! Brilliant!