Officers shot and killed a man who was reportedly acting erratically under a Worland bridge after he fired a handgun at them Monday evening when they tried to arrest him, the Worland Police Department reported the following day. 

One officer sustained a non life-threatening gunshot wound during the encounter, Worland Police Chief Gabe Elliot wrote in a statement posted Tuesday to the department’s Facebook page. The unidentified officer was hospitalized but released the same day, Elliot wrote. 

The statement did not specify whether the man killed by police was the person who fired the shot that hit the officer. Nor did it offer details about the officer’s injuries.

Elliot did not respond Tuesday afternoon to a WyoFile voicemail seeking further information. After this story initially published online, Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation Commander Ryan Cox told WyoFile that while further investigation was needed, the round that struck the officer did not appear to be friendly fire.

Officers responded to the New River Bridge, an access point to Worland over the Bighorn River, at 6:45 p.m. Monday, after someone reported a man yelling and kicking his belongings around in an area under the bridge, according to Elliot’s Facebook post. Elliot described the man as 37 years old and declined to name him. 

In a separate press release issued Tuesday, DCI announced it would conduct an inquiry into the shooting and asked witnesses or people with surveillance cameras in the area to contact the department.

Responding officers found the man standing by his vehicle, but when he saw police approaching he got back in, Elliot wrote. The man later complied with a request to exit his car and talk to officers. A supervising officer – neither Elliot nor DCI named the responding officers – who came onto the scene recognized the man as being a suspect from an investigation into a property crime earlier that day.

The supervisor told officers to arrest the man, according to Elliot. “The male physically resisted arrest as he began to fight with the officers,” the chief wrote. The man appears to have been able to hold off officers attempting an arrest and “produced a handgun,” which he then fired at officers. Neither Elliot nor DCI’s press release states how many shots the man fired. 

There were four Worland police officers on scene, and two of them returned fire, according to Elliot’s press release. They shot the man, who died at the scene. Those two officers are on administrative leave, Elliot wrote. That’s a common response after police shootings regardless of what party was at fault.

Elliot’s social media post does not mention whether the officers’ bodyworn cameras captured the shooting, or when such footage would be released. (Police bodycam footage is not a mandated public record in Wyoming.) DCI’s press release states that investigators will analyze digital evidence, as well as physical evidence from the scene, but it does not specify what evidence was available. It is common practice in Wyoming for DCI agents to investigate police shootings around the state. The agency has developed an investigative group to respond to such incidents. 

DCI’s report is then provided to a county prosecutor, whether that’s the district attorney of the county where the incident occurs or a special prosecutor brought in from the outside.

That attorney then makes the decision about whether officers’ use of force was justified, or if the responding officers might face any criminal charges. 

UPDATE: This story has been updated to include addition information from Wyoming DCI.Ed.

Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *