Share this:

The Wyoming Attorney General’s office is asking a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit against several former and current officials at the women’s prison in Lusk for their role in hiring and employing a guard who was later convicted of sexually assaulting an inmate in 2023. 

The state contends that the lawsuit does not make a plausible claim and was filed outside the statute of limitations. The motion to dismiss, filed Saturday, also argues that Wyoming’s U.S. District Court does not have jurisdiction in the case. 

“Consequently, the State Defendants should be dismissed from this action,” the motion states. 

Since 2020, three former prison guards at the Wyoming Women’s Center have been convicted of sexually assaulting female inmates. One of those women, Chasity Jacobs, filed a federal lawsuit in August that argued the sexual abuse violated her constitutional rights. 

The lawsuit also makes a claim under the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act for what the plaintiff described as negligence by the prison’s Warden Timothy Lang and Associate Warden Robert Harty. 

“The pervasive problem of sexual assault by WWC correctional officers was well known to prison administrators including, specifically, Defendants Lang and Hardy,” the lawsuit argues. “Despite this, Defendant Lang, and other supervisory personnel failed to implement safeguards or address the systemic breakdowns in hiring, training, reporting, or accountability that enabled repeated sexual abuse.” 

Before he was hired to work at the women’s prison in 2019, Joseph Gaul was fired from at least two public-sector jobs in Nebraska due to misconduct toward women, according to the lawsuit.  

The Wyoming Women’s Center is located in Lusk, Wyoming. (Maggie Mullen/WyoFile)

In 2023, he pleaded guilty to second-degree sexual assault against the plaintiff. He was later sentenced to two to five years in prison and is eligible for parole in October, according to the Wyoming Department of Corrections. 

In a Sept. 30 response to the complaint, Gaul, 46, wrote that he had not yet secured an attorney for the case. The Wyoming Attorney General is representing Warden Lang and Associate Warden Harty.

Motion to dismiss

In its motion, the Wyoming Attorney General’s office claims that the U.S. Constitution’s 11th Amendment — which prohibits federal courts from hearing lawsuits against a state filed by citizens of another state or a foreign country — provides the state with immunity in this instance. 

More specifically, it bars federal court jurisdiction over a state agency, in this case the women’s prison, for both money damages and injunctive relief, the state argues. 

In the lawsuit, Jacobs makes claims under a federal statute known as Section 1983, which allows individuals to sue state and local government officials for depriving them of their constitutional or federal rights while acting “under color of state law.” 

The prison warden and deputy warden, however, “are not ‘persons’ subject” to Section 1983, the attorney general’s motion argues. 

Furthermore, the state alleges, the lawsuit does not establish that Lang or Harty acted in a deliberate, intentional way to violate the plaintiff’s legal rights. In other words, it is not enough that either Lang or Harty acted in a supervisory role when Gaul violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights. 

“Jacobs manages to refer to a specific act… the hiring of Gaul… but she does not allege that the State Defendants actually did the hiring,” the motion states. 

“Jacobs also does not allege that the State Defendants knew anything about Gaul’s alleged history, and thus she does not begin to allege they had a culpable state of mind (deliberate indifference).” 

The state also accuses the plaintiff of filing a Wyoming Governmental Claims Act claim outside the two years allowed under the statute of limitations. 

“The latest sexual assault alleged by Jacobs in this case occurred on July 24, 2023,” the motion states. “Jacobs had until July 24, 2025 to file a notice of claim under the WGCA.”

And because Lang and Harty are state employees, “Jacobs was required to file the notice of claim with ‘the general services division of the department of administration and information,” the state’s motion claims.

When the lawsuit was filed in August, attorneys for Jacobs included an exhibit of a notice of claim to the Wyoming Department of Corrections, the Wyoming Attorney General, Lang and Harty. It is dated July 21, 2025. 

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Interesting article about Wyoming Attorney General Keith Kautz and his office’s decision in this case. Formerly a Wyoming Supreme Court Justice from 2015 to 2024 and then appointed by Governor Gordon as the Wyoming AG.