Two boys hurry to Sunrise Elementary School in Cheyenne in 2017. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)
Share this:

House Bill 199, “Wyoming Freedom Scholarship Act,” just does not make sense for our state. 

We must be vigilant of deep-pocketed out-of-state parties that want to destroy public education. They try to convince Wyoming’s citizens that universal vouchers are the future of education with misleading statements like, “The money should follow the child,” and “Public education will not be harmed by ESAs,” and “Universal vouchers increase academic achievement.”

Opinion

We must seek the truth.

Research conducted by people without a vested interest in education savings accounts proves all of these narratives to be false. Sure, in the short term, benefits can be seen; however, the long-term costs devastate the states where ESAs take hold. 

Think and consider: What is the purpose of taxes? 

Tax money is used to help everyone by providing things like roads, schools, and health care. By paying taxes, we all help make our communities better and support important services. We hate to pay them, but taxes benefit all in our community. Using the logic of the proponents of HB 199, school funds provided by taxes should only go to the child. For a moment, let’s agree with that thinking. As taxpayers, we should only fund the governmental services we use. My taxes should not subsidize Shoshoni’s fire station. My taxes should not fund roads built in Star Valley. My taxes shouldn’t go toward child development centers, after all, I have a high schooler at home. The belief that my taxes should follow my child is selfish and short-sighted. The taxes benefit all of us, in one way or another.

Follow the money

Some of our state representatives have a vested interest in HB 199 passing because they sit on boards of charter schools in Wyoming. I’m curious why they didn’t recuse themselves or announce their conflict of interest.  

If 93% of Wyoming students attend public schools, why does the state Legislature want to use public funds for schooling only a fraction of Wyoming families use? 

The House Freedom Caucus wants us to believe vouchers will not take funding away from public schools, but they certainly avoid answering questions about this. Once we dissect many of the other bills introduced in the House and Senate, public education loses over half a billion dollars over the next three years although amendments could change that amount.

Ultimately, public education loses. No matter how we slice it, the Wyoming Freedom Caucus opened the legislative session with public schools in its crosshairs. You don’t believe me? Go read the legislation. 

One measure in the Senate, Senate Joint Resolution 6, “School Capital Construction-Constitutional Amendment,” puts school capital construction projects back on the communities that schools serve. The state will no longer be responsible for building schools. The reason the state is legally responsible for school capital construction is tax income for each public school district varies drastically. The state will return to the haves and have-nots, and our children lose. 

State legislators point to the state of Arizona as proof of the cost-effectiveness of universal vouchers and the reason to follow in their footsteps. But ballooning costs indicate otherwise. 

When we follow how universal ESAs came into play in Arizona, we can see the Wyoming Freedom Caucus following those steps exactly. The messaging. The propaganda. The incremental steps in legislation. How is this working out for Arizona? According to Arizona’s Joint Legislative Budget Committee, taxpayers will spend $33 million in fiscal year 2023, $65 million in FY24, and $125 million in FY25 from empowerment scholarships. With 77% of the 9,710 enrollees this school year coming from outside of the public system, the cost of these students will likely be around $52 million, close to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee estimate. A report released by the nonpartisan Grand Canyon Institute estimates “the projected net cost of Arizona’s universal ESA voucher program is equal to at least half of the state’s budget deficit this year — and about two-thirds of next year’s projected deficit.” Hard-working Wyoming citizens don’t want to throw their tax dollars at something that doesn’t work. 

This is about student achievement and failing public schools. 

Is it? According to Focus First on Children, data shows privatization schemes have failed at their ostensible goal of improving academic outcomes for students.

“Hailed as an engine of academic opportunity for disadvantaged students left behind in a broken public education system, school vouchers, and charter schools have instead provided ‘school choice’ for the rich and worsened educational conditions for middle and low-income students,” the bipartisan Focus First on Children found.

Additionally, numerous empirical research studies concluded, “the last decade of research on traditional vouchers strongly suggests they actually lower academic achievement.” Similarly, Stanford University research showed: “[T]here’s no evidence that voucher programs significantly increase test scores … At best, they have only a modest impact on high school graduation rates … and the risks they pose outweigh any advances.” 

Universal vouchers and privatized education do not improve academic performance. Why is the Freedom Caucus throwing money at ESAs when the research shows they don’t work? Meanwhile, our public school students and educators have proven time and again that Wyoming public schools are some of the best in the nation. Last year, our juniors’ ACT scores outpaced the other nine states that require ACT participation. The National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the nation’s report card, reveals our fourth and eighth graders are fourth in the nation, according to Ignite Wyoming. Our state leaders should be celebrating how great our kids do academically. Instead, they are perpetuating a false narrative that our schools are failing and trying to fix a system that works. 

I urge Wyoming citizens to do their own research. Look at the facts, the research and the condition of Arizona’s public schools after only two years of universal vouchers. Contact your senators now and ask them to vote down House Bill 199, Senate Joint Resolution 6, and legislation intended to cut funding to our outstanding public schools. We are quickly running out of time to stop this. However, with your involvement and voice, we can.

Amy Caldwell is an almost-life-long resident of Wyoming, mother of three and Grammy to one. She is an avid supporter of Wyoming public schools and independent, civil discourse.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The “freedom” caucus only wants these vouchers so that they can indoctrinate children in their religious beliefs. This is part of their plan to overthrow the government and establish a theocracy.

  2. “One measure in the Senate, Senate Joint Resolution 6, “School Capital Construction-Constitutional Amendment,” puts school capital construction projects back on the communities that schools serve. The state will no longer be responsible for building schools.” Actually I’m inclined to agree with this resolution. I believe that when stakeholders (in this case local tax payers) have some skin in the game, needs are more closely examined, rather than wants. Yup, different school districts have different levels of tax income, however that does not preclude local stakeholders from voting on capital improvement bonds. I would submit that the local taxpayers have a much better idea of what their district facility needs are and at what level their pocketbooks should support those needs.
    Universal school vouchers, nope…..I’ll support your decision, if you choose not to enroll your child in public education. But I will not support your decision with my tax dollars. If the folks that oppose public education would become involved in trying to correct what they perceive as a problem, instead of looking for “free money” maybe progress could be made. Here’s a question, what ever happened to PTA?

    1. Article 7, Section 1 of Wyoming’s constitution guarantees that all children in Wyoming have the right to a free public education, stating “The legislature shall provide for the establishment and maintenance of a complete and *uniform* system of public instruction, embracing free elementary schools of every needed kind and grade, a university with such technical and professional departments as the public good may require and the means of the state allow, and such other institutions as may be necessary.”

      How exactly does asking communities with limited resources to fund education completely independently of others meet the standard that education in the state is *uniform*? With vouchers further draining the pot of money available to rural communities, this is a recipe for disaster.

  3. I’m a single childless taxpayer. I find it funny when the people who want this bill complain about having to pay taxes for public education as well as tuition for private education. I guess that I could whine about being disadvantaged because I choose not to have children but I feel that my educational dollars are going for the greater good in my community.
    My problems with private education includes the lack of accountability; no programs that are required in public schools such as special education; and not having to provide their curriculum to the state.

  4. Meanwhile, the state of Oklahoma is learning that their school system, run by a fake christian, is slowing economic growth. One business leader said that education is the big driver for economic development and that the state must get rid of the Superintendent of education. This is the guy that wants to (or did) purchase the fake Trump bibles. Oklahoma is the second worst school system in the nation. Reject the christian nonsense, Wyoming.

  5. For charter schools, will they be providing education for autistic children or those children with physical disabilities that need special accommodations for accessing the facility. Special learning needs children need specialized learning plans. Taking too much money from public education may detrimentally affect special needs children. Its time to slow down and take a look at potential outcomes for all children

    1. Hello. I know that not every public school offers the same programs, but they do exist. If you are someone, or know someone who needs a school like this, look into Sheridan, WY. You might find what you are looking for.