Breaking with the longstanding norm of intraparty candidate neutrality, a Wyoming Republican Party official asked members of Congress for help vetting potential challengers to U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney in next year’s Republican primary.

According to emails obtained by WyoFile, Wyoming Republican Party Revenue Committee Chairman Jeff Wallack contacted staffers for Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) on June 15 “seeking veterans in Congress to vet our retired military candidates Denton Knapp and Bryan Miller.” 

Crenshaw, a Cheney ally and former Navy Seal, declined the request.

Wallack made a similar request to Rep. Mike Waltz (R-Florida), a former Green Beret, as well as “several other” veterans in conservative politics, Wallack said. It is unclear if any of those individuals took him up on the request.

Neither Waltz or Crenshaw’s offices responded to a request for comment.

Wyoming Republican Party Revenue Committee Chairman Jeff Wallack. (Courtesy: Jeff Wallack)

The email exchanges underscore the delicate balancing act party officials are performing. The Wyoming Republican Party censured Cheney following her vote to impeach former President Donald Trump in the wake of the Jan. 6  Capitol riots in Washington. Party officials have since openly expressed dissatisfaction with Cheney — even mocking her at party functions. Yet the Wyoming GOP has traditionally maintained a neutral stance on all candidates until a primary winner is announced. The party has continued that tradition in its official capacity. 

Wallack’s emails, however, appear to contradict that approach. Though Wallack wrote in the emails he was working on behalf of himself and various other “leaders” in Wyoming seeking to replace Cheney, he identified himself by using his official title within the Wyoming GOP, blurring the line of neutrality.

Wallack now says his outreach was a “mistake.” 

Party chairman Frank Eathorne has been made aware of the emails, Wallack said, and declined to levy discipline.

“It was just a personal inquiry, it was all personal, not on behalf of anybody,” Wallack said. “I just thought I’d like to get some help vetting the candidates. One of the congressmen I contacted was obviously a Cheney supporter, and that was my mistake. I should have looked first before I asked.”

Optics aside, Wallack’s inquiries were perfectly legal. Several current and former members of the Wyoming GOP’s state central committee said there is no language in the Wyoming Republican Party’s 2020 bylaws preventing members other than the party chairman from participating in advocacy work for or against candidates, and no law bars members of state parties from actively recruiting opponents against their own candidates.

The Federal Elections Commission has no rules or regulations addressing potential conflicts of interest by party volunteers in vetting candidates, an official with the commission wrote in an email. Wyoming state law does not prevent direct advocacy for primary candidates by members of the state party.

Support independent reporting — donate to WyoFile today

“Our statutes don’t specifically address this issue, simply because as long as someone meets the constitutional and, now, the residency requirements to run for U.S. House and pays the filing fee, anyone can run for the office,” Monique Meese, communications director for the Wyoming Secretary of State’s office, wrote in an email. “There’s no ‘vetting’ process for candidates prescribed in statute other than that. Some states do place the responsibility of validating candidate requirements with their parties, we obviously do not.”

Wallack believes he and other activists in the party have the right to attempt to identify the best candidate for the job, he said. It’s a right he says he will continue to exercise.

Just with more discretion.

“I should not have mentioned I was a volunteer with [the Wyoming Republican Party], so I learned my lesson,” Wallack said. 

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Really, the only part of the article that matters:

    “Optics aside, Wallack’s inquiries were perfectly legal. Several current and former members of the Wyoming GOP’s state central committee said there is no language in the Wyoming Republican Party’s 2020 bylaws preventing members other than the party chairman from participating in advocacy work for or against candidates, and no law bars members of state parties from actively recruiting opponents against their own candidates.

    The Federal Elections Commission has no rules or regulations addressing potential conflicts of interest by party volunteers in vetting candidates, an official with the commission wrote in an email. Wyoming state law does not prevent direct advocacy for primary candidates by members of the state party.

    “Our statutes don’t specifically address this issue, simply because as long as someone meets the constitutional and, now, the residency requirements to run for U.S. House and pays the filing fee, anyone can run for the office,” Monique Meese, communications director for the Wyoming Secretary of State’s office, wrote in an email. “There’s no ‘vetting’ process for candidates prescribed in statute other than that. Some states do place the responsibility of validating candidate requirements with their parties, we obviously do not.”

  2. Obviously the Wyoming GOP needs to get their act together. The majority of Wyoming voters are old school fiscal conservatives with a liberal attitude toward most social issues. Intervention in other countries is not part of that worldview.
    This is where Cheney departs from our state party. She is playing her dad’s politics. The Bush era is over. We want our troops to come home. I can see where the Wyoming GOP may have wanted to scope out these candidates and see if they represent our values as an electorate. But outside voices?
    Washington is a mess. Corruption and backstabbing are systemic. Cheney dropped Trump like a bad habit just to be in the “in crowd” in DC. I dated a Republican politician just like her. Conscience? Oh please….
    Career politicians play games. She knows that Pelosi is making a power play and wants to be on the winning team for her own benefit.
    We need local groups vetting these candidates. Wyoming needs to draw up the questions. Otherwise we’ll get another player who just wants to be popular in DC.
    My two cents.