Share this:

Editor's note

This story is part of an ongoing collaboration between WyoFile and the Jackson Hole News&Guide.

CHEYENNE—The Wyoming House of Representatives voted Thursday to investigate a Monday night incident that involved a conservative activist handing out campaign donation checks to lawmakers on the House floor.

The House voted 61-0, with one lawmaker excused, to form a special committee to investigate the incident. The unanimous vote in the normally heavily divided body illustrates how much the incident has reverberated throughout the Wyoming Capitol and beyond in less than 24 hours.

Rebecca Bextel, a Jackson resident who unsuccessfully sought the top leadership spot of the Wyoming Republican Party last year, admitted Wednesday in a social media post to handing out checks from a separate Teton County donor on the House floor. Bextel said there was no wrongdoing in “delivering lawful campaign checks from Teton County donors when I am in Cheyenne.” 

Rep. Karlee Provenza, D-Laramie, during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Rep. Karlee Provenza, D-Laramie, brought the motion Thursday after Bextel acknowledged Wednesday that she had delivered the checks on behalf of an unnamed Teton County donor. Bextel had earlier told a reporter “it’s nobody’s business” when asked about what she had given lawmakers.

As first reported Wednesday by WyoFile and the Jackson Hole News&Guide, interviews, a photograph taken by Provenza and security footage also substantiated Bextel’s actions. Lawmakers referenced the reporting throughout their discussion Thursday. 

The exchange of money occurred Monday night, but lawmakers did not publicly broach the subject until Wednesday when Rep. Mike Yin, D-Jackson, raised concerns about the checks during a debate on a bill that Bextel supports. 

Yin did not name Bextel in his floor remarks, but said he was concerned with the “optics” of lawmakers accepting the checks two days ahead of deciding on such legislation. 

Rebecca Bextel hands a check to Rock Springs Republican Rep. Darin McCann on Monday, Feb. 9, 2026, during the 68th Wyoming Legislature’s budget session in Cheyenne. (Rep. Karlee Provenza)

Wyoming Freedom Caucus members called the allegations “unsubstantiated” before asking the House to register a “protest” against Yin. Cody Republican Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, chair of the caucus, said if checks were handed out, it “essentially would be bribery and unethical.” She also accused Yin of making “a defamatory statement.”

As written, Provenza’s motion would convene a special committee to investigate whether checks were provided to House members and whether that action is violation of the Wyoming Constitution, or if it constitutes legislative misconduct.

“The special committee would investigate all relevant facts about this matter, hold public hearings and issue a public report to the House of Representatives,” the motion states. 

“This incident calls into question the ethics and impartiality of members,” Provenza said Thursday. “I believe the integrity of the House requires that we investigate this incident and disclose all relevant facts about that incident to all members of the House and to all of Wyoming.”

Reps. Mike Yin, D-Jackson, and Daniel Singh, R-Cheyenne, speak during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The House debated Provenza’s motion for about 45 minutes before Rep. Daniel Singh, R-Cheyenne brought a successful motion to briefly table the measure as to allow for amendments to be drafted. 

An hour later, the body debated two amendments. Both failed. 

Singh brought the first amendment, which would have broadened the special committee’s purview to include reviewing potential revisions to the state’s public record laws. Rodriguez-Williams brought the second. That amendment would have called on the committee to determine “whether there was a security breach.” 

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Suspiciously as it happened Bear, Rodreguiz and Neiman pounced on Yin like he was the one that had done something wrong. Sorta like a cat burying another cat’s turd. Nothing to see here! As has been said, Follow the money!