Editor's note

This story is part of an ongoing collaboration between WyoFile and the Jackson Hole News&Guide.

The Wyoming Legislature’s Management Council decided last week to expand its legislative ethics training after some representatives accepted campaign checks on the House floor this session, spurring controversy.

The group, which consists of the Legislature’s highest ranking officials from both political parties, voted unanimously in favor of the ethics training.

They also may take further action before the 2027 session, including tweaking more House and Senate rules. Some lawmakers are also interested in seeing new laws, which are more broad than legislative rules, that deal with campaign finance and lobbying.

Meanwhile, a former leader of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus wants to look into rules for legislative staff, citing concerns lobbyists were allegedly working as legislative aides during the session. The lawmaker hasn’t yet released evidence of that activity, but said it’s being investigated.

Rebecca Bextel during the first meeting of the House Special Investigative Committee on Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026, at the Wyoming Capitol in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The controversy, which has become known as “Checkgate,” began when conservative activist Rebecca Bextel, the Teton County GOP’s state committeewoman, handed campaign checks to four lawmakers on the House floor after the first day of the session concluded. She also handed checks from Teton County donor Don Grasso to other legislators elsewhere in the Capitol during the first week of the session.

While Bextel denied any wrongdoing, the handoffs spurred political scrutiny, lobbying complaints, an executive order, rule changes, a criminal bribery investigation — which has not yet concluded or been shared with the public — and a House investigation, which wrapped up March 6. The House Special Investigative Committee found no evidence of wrongdoing, but concluded that Bextel’s activity on the floor was “undesirable and must never happen again.”

The Investigative Committee also made recommendations for the Management Council to consider.

On April 1, House Minority Floor Leader Mike Yin, D-Jackson, asked the council to consider some of those recommendations in the “interim,” the time between legislative sessions.

The proposals include adding signage to the entry of the floor of the House of Representatives detailing expectations and guidance to visitors; reviewing other states’ legislative rules concerning political campaign activities during sessions; and creating legislative training lessons about “the institution, the need to avoid appearances of impropriety” and why existing rules make the House floor “a special place.”

Rep. Mike Yin, D-Jackson, during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature’s budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Yin helped bring the check-passing incident to light by discussing it on the House floor the first week. He was criticized for doing so, and other lawmakers filed an ethics complaint about his decision to do so. House leadership threw out the complaint, along with others filed against Rep. Karlee Provenza, D-Laramie, who took a photo of Bextel and provided it to the press.

Senate Majority Floor Leader Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, backed Yin’s motion.

“I think we can dispose of one particular issue now, which is legislator training,” she said.

The training, as proposed, is set to be for all lawmakers, not just representatives, and address “all of the topics implicated this past year.”

While Nethercott and Yin also wanted to establish a subcommittee to draft and propose new rules in response to the conduct on the House floor, the Management Council asked Legislative Service Office Director Matt Obrecht first to review policy in neighboring states, see what may be appropriate in Wyoming, and present his conclusions at the council’s next meeting. After Obrecht’s report is complete, Senate President Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester, said the council can consider establishing the subcommittee.

In all, the Management Council spent about five minutes of its all-day meeting last week discussing the House Special Investigative Committee’s recommendations. The meeting, which follows the end of every legislative session, was called to discuss “interim” topics and mull internal affairs, like adding a speed bump in the lawmakers’ parking garage, and establishing a new security fund for the Legislature.

Before the end of the brief discussion, Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette, the former leader of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, said the subcommittee should also consider rules for legislative staff, interns and legislative aides. Director Obrecht is now looking into those policies.

“We’ve been made aware of some issues concerning registered lobbyists doubling as legislative aides in violation of legislative rules and policies,” Bear said in a statement to the Jackson Hole News&Guide.

Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette, during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

“We have begun investigating the situation and will disseminate information to the public at the appropriate time,” he added.

Bear received a check from Bextel, but not on the House floor. He was one of the lawmakers who criticized Yin for bringing up the checks.

Yin, for his part, is interested in studying campaign finance and election law changes. The Joint Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee didn’t ask specifically to consider those changes during the interim — and Management Council didn’t ask them to do so last week. But Yin sits on the Corporations Committee and said he may propose some ideas.

“I want to make sure that we’ve covered all of our bases with the laws that we currently have,” he said. “I’m curious on how the lobbyist statutes that we have apply and whether we’ve enforced them properly.”

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Jasmine Hall covers state government and politics for the Jackson Hole News&Guide after spending two years in Wyoming’s capital. Her roots can be traced back to Appalachia and Michigan State University....

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. John Bear will never own up to his mistakes. He will always deflect the blame to someone else. For once, John, admit you were wrong and vow to do better.