As summer slowly heats up and families around the state begin turning on their air conditioning and fans, they do so with no small amount of trepidation. Electricity prices, like so many other things we’re paying more for these days, have been hard to afford for far too many of us, especially our elderly and disadvantaged. But even with rising costs, there is no denying the importance of energy as a driver of health and wealth for our state and our nation. The same energy that powers our factories and mega-marts also powers lifesaving equipment in our hospitals and urgent care centers, as well as our emergency dispatch and call centers. Nothing any of us does in our daily lives can be done without energy. And yet, the issue divides us.
Opinion
Wyomingites do not require seasonal cooling and warming, or in the case of some states, blackouts, to remind us of the importance of energy. We see it as we drive, work and play. We see it in the ebb and flow of men and women going to work in our mines, natural gas fields and refineries each day. These jobs feed Wyoming families and enliven our communities with an economic cascade of benefits. The taxes Wyoming receives from energy extraction and production fuel our public schools as well as many other government functions.
From coal to natural gas to wind, solar, sequestration and beyond, Wyoming’s energy is the most important economic driver of our state, and we need leaders who focus more on diversification and less on political pandering.
The recent proposal by the Biden administration to effectively shut down coal extraction by 2041 in the Powder River Basin, the heart of Wyoming’s coal country, is another troubling example of the kind of pandering we don’t need in the quest to solve America’s energy issues. This damaging new federal directive prompted Gov. Mark Gordon to respond:

“This … is not about making a well-informed decision. It is about Joe Biden’s partisan, vindictive, and politically motivated war on America’s abundant, cheap, efficient, and consistent energy sources — one that holds practical and achievable goals to remove carbon dioxide from our atmosphere. This administration touts its preference for ‘best available science’ yet only chooses to highlight the science that advances their job- and career-killing agenda.
As Governor, I am profoundly disappointed that our nation’s highest executive leadership has chosen to ignore innovation and opportunity to grovel at the feet of coastal elites …The issues we face globally right now are too important and too urgent to dither away with incoherent policies and wrongheaded initiatives. As with the other attacks on Wyoming’s fossil fuel industries, the Attorney General is actively pursuing options to challenge these destructive decisions.”
Gordon is right to continue defending Wyoming’s energy sector, including our coal producers, but let’s keep in mind he is also right to defend and promote all forms of energy production in Wyoming. Let’s look at just what Wyoming energy, like coal, means for our state and our nation.
Wyoming mines around 41% of the nation’s coal and we produce 12 times more energy than we consume. We are the second largest overall energy provider in the nation, the 8th largest crude oil producer and the 10th largest natural gas producer, according to the U.S. Energy Information Agency.
According to the Wyoming Mining Association, Wyoming has over 1.4 trillion tons of coal resources in seams in the Powder River Basin. Estimates give Wyoming more than 165 billion tons of currently recoverable coal with today’s technology. This coal contains a low sulfur composition, has a very low production cost given its location and sits near a rail system giving it immediate access to easy transportation across the United States.
Coal use has been slowly decreasing, in no small measure because of political agendas, but also because of technologies like fracking that have produced lower-cost natural gas (something Wyoming’s energy sector also produces). But coal is still needed by Wyoming and a myriad other states like Texas, Missouri, Illinois, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Nebraska, Kansas, Michigan and Iowa that burn it. Coal is still the third-largest energy source in the country. And while coal-fired power plants are slowly fading out, they are not gone, and the need for coal is expected to continue well past 2041.

But one need only look through Biden’s energy policies to find ideas that won’t meet the need for reliant, clean, efficient and low-cost energy in the United States. Rather his plans contain a lot of political rhetoric pandering to voters, unhelpful ideas like clean energy projects to advance social justice issues, (I’m sorry, what?) such as the president’s Justice 40 Initiative. While plans to upgrade our aging transmission lines are important, it is clear there is far too much politics being played at the expense of long-term plans to prepare for America’s expanding energy needs. All of this is relevant to Wyoming and our energy producers.
While the shutting down of the Powder River Basin may be a victory for some who would like to end all coal use today, the reality is very different for those millions of people dependent upon Wyoming energy far beyond tomorrow.
From those on the right those who wish to outlaw wind energy or carbon sequestration projects and those on the left who want to eliminate coal and use our energy sector as some kind of social justice experiment, we see extreme positions that are dangerous and idiotic.
These extremes in energy positioning help no one, and only serve to further divide the nation politically. Wyoming’s future as an energy producer will be secure if we stay focused on defending our legacy producers while looking to the future toward innovation and diversification. But we will only achieve this if we elect leaders who see the importance of all of it, and aren’t narrowly focused on using energy to play politics. There’s too much at stake to do otherwise.


Can any remember the energy shortage we had in the 70 s 😄
In case you don’t click Shannon’s link, here’s a key piece from it that nicely refutes Amy’s opinion piece:
“At current rates of extraction, coal companies that mine in the Powder River Basin have enough deposits to continue mining until 2041, she [the author of the piece] pointed out, citing research by the Bureau of Land Management. The BLM, the federal agency, is responsible for leasing coal from the subterranean land. It does so only in response to proposals from mining companies. In other words, the companies must ask to mine more coal.
None have done so since 2012. Two pending leases have stalled since 2015, awaiting action by the companies. The door was open for a long time without any coal companies walking in.”
We NEED to focus on finding solutions to our many problems in Wyoming and the rest of the county. Finding a way to use our coal reserves safely and economically is imperative. More political extremism is detrimental to society and leads us nowhere. Our screaming ranting politicians and media figures are obviously financially rewarded for their performances. We can only blame ourselves because we respond to them.
Amy, none of this is even remotely true. Biden is not waging a war against Wyoming he’s trying to positively affect climate change. Also from what I’ve read the coal industry has coal leases to last many many years and the reason their production is down is because the world does not want to buy dirty energy. It has nothing to do with Biden. Our former Governor even said that. It appears that you’re just stoking fear in a state where the far right Republicans live in fear. That won’t solve the problems that are so prevalent in the United States today. Instead of always just blaming the ” evil” Democrats, maybe we should get together with all sides and start trying to really solve our problems. Stoking fear has made the problems worse
Dean. All that is forced up on USA citizens with this green scam climate control will not make a drop in bucket as far as climate change goes. Wars in Ukraine/gaza and else where are releasing 100 fold emissions over what we “save”. Energy expended just mining minerals for EV’s are more than 1000 EV’s will save. China and India continue to build coal fired power plants at very rapid rate. So their citizens can have cheap affordable energy. It a sad farce forced upon USA citizens. After all world started to warm up 11,000 years ago. All a farce. Expensive farce. But farce non the less
Not a farce my friend as it is impossible to believe humans cannot impact our environment as we have consistently poisoned the air and therefore people since we started forging metals resulting in more cancers and violence due to the emission of these pollutants. So we have data we can impact our world and so once can apply those lessons learned to Carbon? I will say humans burning 450 million years of stored Carbon in only 200 years is CERTAINLY causing negative impacts which are as plain as the nose on one’s face.
With that said the only reason for our currently wonderful yet complex society is due to the energy density of fossil fuels. Nothing beats them or can replace them and that is the issue we should embrace and discuss. In fact it is pretty evident that our rise in inflation starting in the mid 1980s has been a result of the rising cost of getting that energy as the energy cost of energy is rising significantly.
Rising costs of energy along with the impacts caused by burning that energy has no real solution as there is no such thing as an unlimited cheap energy source contained on this finite planet. We live in an energy system that uses a poor system called finance to manage our energy needs and that is the system that is failing.
Read a different perspective….. https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/2024/05/31/280-not-what-youve-been-told/
Could someone remind me about Amy Edmonds’ credentials, experience or expertise in energy, economics or public policy? I have a clear recollection of Edmonds pandering to the far right in her brief tenure in the WyLeg, but no real memories of her having any expertise in energy.
“[Coal] jobs feed families” isn’t much of a reason to continue coal extraction in the Powder River Basin. It’s a bit like defending smoking because tobacco farms provide income to families. A defensible public policy that doesn’t pander to the far right would consider employment in the context of a country making a logical, orderly transition to sustainable energy. Wyoming needs to make that shift, the sooner the better.
Edmonds’ muddled, mediocre thinking here would have us equate the two or three right wing lunatics who want to ban wind energy with those who understand the provable harms that coal causes. It’s a false equivalency and an example of the very idiotic thinking she claims to critique.
For a different perspective read: https://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/big-pivots-plenty-of-outrage-was-it-justified/