Latest Wyoming News

Wyoming Supreme Court allows major wind turbine project to advance

State’s high court disagrees with lower court ruling that the proposed clean energy project near Glenrock must connect to the power grid.

by Charles Farmer, Douglas Budget 21 hours agoNovember 3, 2026

The Supreme Court of Wyoming. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled Tuesday to allow the Pronghorn H2 wind project on state trust land near Glenrock to move forward.

The court ruled that the Wyoming State Board of Land Commissioners’ approval of the Pronghorn H2 wind lease south of Glenrock could advance to the Industrial Siting Council, even though the court also found that neighboring landowner Michael Stephens and Stephens Land and Livestock have standing to sue.

The Wyoming Supreme Court, with no judges dissenting, reversed Douglas District Court Judge F. Scott Peasley’s decision to toss the deal. Peasley threw out the lease because the project did not connect to the power grid, interpreting the “wind energy leasing” rule as requiring a grid connection. The supreme court disagreed.

At the same time, the state’s high court also found that the petitioners have standing to sue because of their proximity to the project, calling the harms to views and property values “substantial, immediate and pecuniary.”

The justices rejected the other challenges to the project, regarding how much money it would raise for the state, future mineral interests and impacts to wildlife. The court found that the land board is allowed to set rates on a case-by-case basis, and that companies could still lease the minerals on the state land, provided they cannot unreasonably get in the way of the wind farm.

The Pronghorn H2 project still has to go through the Industrial Siting Council permitting process, which can take several years and may address other concerns the plaintiffs have.

“These decisions were never political, they were made to ensure the highest and best value for our state lands, buttressed by the legal and contractual obligations made by the state,” Gov. Mark Gordon said in a statement. “Today’s Supreme Court decision affirms the original vote made by the State Board of Land Commissioners granting this lease.”

The plaintiffs can file within the next 15 days for a rehearing, although these requests are rarely granted.

There are about 1,500 wind turbines spinning in Wyoming with a generating capacity of approximately 3,700 megawatts — that’s about 25% of the state’s total electrical generation capacity, according to multiple sources compiled in April by WyoFile.

How much more wind energy might Wyoming see? It’s complicated.

Wyoming’s top officials promise to reckon with ever-increasing wind projects, other development

Charles Farmer, Douglas Budget

Charles Farmer is the city and government reporter for the Douglas Budget and Glenrock Independent. He is a member of the Wyoming Press Association and National Press Photographers Association. He can... More by Charles Farmer, Douglas Budget

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.