Share this:

DEVILS TOWER—When the cyclic population of deer near Ogden Driskill’s Crook County ranch peaks, sometimes he’ll count as many as 800 whitetails grazing away in a single meadow.

That circle-shaped pasture draws in the deer because of its irrigated, nutritious grasses, and it doubles as a venue for nightly 6 p.m. hayrides targeted at tourists. The throngs visiting Northeast Wyoming pack onto a trailer towed by a tractor to enjoy views of the 5,112-foot-high spire that towers over Driskill’s property. 

During the fall of 2021, staff at Driskill’s Bear Lodge Cattle Company took on a new task: removing an eyesore that littered the meadow. 

Sen. Ogden Driskill (R-Devils Tower), the president of the Wyoming Senate, speaks from his living room in November 2023. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

“We started dragging dead deer off and throwing them in the ditch,” said Driskill, who’s also president of the Wyoming Senate. 

The carcasses kept accumulating. What couldn’t be seen still stank. 

“There were so many of them, we quit having the hayrides,” Driskill recalled from his living room. “It smelled so bad along [the hayride route] with dead deer.” 

The culprit explaining the deer deaths was a condition called epizootic hemorrhagic disease. EHD tends to be exacerbated by drought, which spreads near water where disease-carrying biting midges dwell. The more severe the drought, the fewer and smaller the watering holes, the more concentrated the midges and deer — and the worse the EHD outbreaks can be. 

This map depicts suspected and lab-confirmed cases of epizootic hemorrhagic disease in Wyoming in 2021 and 2022. Lighter colors correspond to higher prevalence of the lethal affliction. (Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

In the fall of 2021, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department documented one of the worst EHD epidemics on record. In places, it was every bit as deadly as the winter of 2022-’23, which killed upwards of 60% of collared adult deer and over 70% of adult collared pronghorn in some swaths of western Wyoming. 

“Our 2022-’23 winter [equivalent] was the summer of 2021 and 2022,” said Joe Sandrini, a Wyoming Game and Fish Department biologist who’s managed deer in the Black Hills region for over three decades. “There’s ranches in that Hulett country that lost 80% to 90% of their deer.” 

Driskill’s ranch is square in one of the hardest-hit areas. So is Lee Jensen’s property near Aladdin, on the banks of the Belle Fourche River. Going into the die-off event Jensen could easily tally 1,000 deer on his irrigated pastures, but by this fall the longtime cattle ranching family was hosting more like 100 to 150 animals. 

“It’s just devoid,” Jensen said. 

The lack of deer even influenced the day-to-day Jensen Ranch operations. In a normal year, Jensen has to drive slow and be careful when he’s out irrigating at night on his four-wheeler. 

“You never know when you’re gonna smoke a deer,” he said. “This summer there was nothing moving. I had unfettered access to my roads.”

Two does, flagging their eponymous white tails, bolt into the timber near the base of Devils Tower in November 2023. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

Recovery after the rare back-to-back EHD outbreaks is going to take at least a couple more years, the rancher guessed. Wyoming Game and Fish’s annual deer-counting “classifications” confirm the herds aren’t recovering fast. 

Sandrini rendezvoused with WyoFile at an Interstate 90 rest stop while on a break from counting deer from a helicopter on the slopes of the Bear Lodge Mountains. Mule deer, too, aren’t faring especially well right now in the Black Hills region — which is the story of the species in much of modern Wyoming. Both deer species are native to the state’s northeast corner.

Bottom of a trough

Mule deer numbered an estimated 13,500 in the Black Hills Herd after the 2022 hunting season, down from a recent high of over 32,000 in 2017 and now fewer than half the herd’s 30,000-animal objective. 

“Deer numbers up here cycle, and we’re in the bottom of one of the lowest troughs that we’ve been in — for both species,” Sandrini said. 

Whitetail have had it just as bad on the herd-wide scale. Although south of I-90 death rates weren’t as bad, the EHD outbreaks in 2021 and 2022 were harsh enough to lop the Black Hills Whitetail Herd by a big margin

“We went from an estimated population of about 42,500 to 28,250,” Sandrini said. 

Joe Sandrini, a longtime Wyoming Game and Fish Department biologist in the agency’s Casper Region, talks deer issues from an Interstate 90 rest stop near Sundance in November 2023. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

Go back a few more years to the most recent whitetail population peak in 2017, and numbers were at 62,500. That means the species has fallen off by more than half in what’s normally a productive landscape that grows a lot of deer. 

Overall, Sandrini estimated there are fewer deer in the Black Hills and Bear Lodge Mountains than at any other point during his 32-year tenure in the region, which began in 1992 as a warden trainee. 

Ordinarily, this area is unquestionably the most deer-dense landscape in Wyoming.

“In the last 10 years we’ve averaged about 10% of the mule deer harvest and a third of the whitetail harvest statewide — and that’s in just 3% of the landmass of the state,” Sandrini said. 

Combined, he said, around 20% of all deer that hunters kill of both species in Wyoming are taken down in the six northeasternmost hunt areas where the Black Hills mule deer and whitetail herds dwell. 

Deer hunt areas 1-6, in Wyoming’s far northeast corner, are the domain of the Black Hills whitetail and mule deer herds. (Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

When populations run high, many Crook and Weston county residents believe there are far too many deer in the Black Hills herds. Driskill’s Honda Pilot, which topped 337,000 miles in late November, is plenty familiar with whitetail deer. 

“This vehicle is on liability insurance, because it’s hit two,” Driskill said while out on a drive touring his hayfield. “Virtually everybody that lives here has hit a deer.”

Driskill said he’s OK with feeding 400 or 500 whitetails alongside his cattle at his hayfield. But he’s less tolerant of the species when numbers climb up toward four digits. 

“The deer get in these pods on the alfalfa, and they love the alfalfa,” Driskill said. “They’ll literally destroy your hay. Everything’s got to be game-fenced.” 

Pendulum swings

Jensen saw things similarly: “From my standpoint as a landowner, there were too many deer,” he said. “Now we’ve swung the pendulum 180 degrees.” 

Game and Fish faces challenges if the goal is to hold the Black Hills herds steady in population. When whitetails are thriving, there is far more supply than demand for hunting licenses.

“We can’t control [numbers] with hunting, we just can’t,” Sandrini said. “That’s mostly because we don’t have enough access for doe harvest on private land.” 

Ratcheting up doe hunting on the Black Hills National Forest isn’t a good solution, the biologist said, because it’s not where damage is occurring and it’s the most “heavily used public land in the state.” Every other fawn born in the forest is a buck, he said, and Game and Fish “needs those” antlered animals to “give to hunters.” 

Driskill’s take is that the state agency could be doing a better job holding deer numbers steady, which he believes would help temper the depths of crashes. He’s long been an advocate for statutorily separating whitetail and mule deer — an idea that the Wyoming Wildlife Taskforce (on which Driskill sat) also recommended

Whitetail deer in the Lake De Smet region north of Buffalo. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

But at least for the next few years, dealing with too many deer in the Black Hills and Bear Lodge Mountains is not something wildlife managers and landowners have to worry about.

“Financially, I wanted to see the numbers down, but I don’t believe that anybody wants to see them this low,” Jensen said. “We’ve seen population swings, but we’ve never seen this kind of swing.” 

The majority of locals share the sentiment. Sandrini recently surveyed landowners within the Black Hills herd units and found that 68% deemed mule deer numbers too low and 53% believed there were too few whitetail deer. 

State biologists are seeing a mixed bag when it comes to recovery. Fawn numbers and survival rates in mule deer in 2023 were “pretty good,” and high enough to “start digging us out of a hole.”  

“Whitetail, not so much,” Sandrini said. Both fawn production and survival in the whitetail herd have been “pretty poor,” he said, which has also been the case for nearby whitetail herds. 

But eventually, the herds are bound to come up. 

In recent history, the Black Hills have been one of the more productive places in Wyoming for growing mule deer. And it’s prime habitat for whitetails, too. If there are two or three consecutive years of good fawn production and survival, the region will be “back in the deer business,” Sandrini said. 

After that, the process might cycle all over once again.  

“We just don’t get enough harvest to control deer when they’re doing well,” Sandrini said. “And then we get a harsh winter or these disease outbreaks and we crash.”

A buck whitetail deer breezes by wild turkeys in the closed KOA campground near the base of Devils Tower. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Who made the decision that nature should be controlled? Cattle ranchers? GOVERNment? HUNT WITH A CAMERA

  2. “There’s ranches in that Hulett country that lost 80% to 90% of their deer.” Wow, Mr Sandrini, I didn’t realize that the deer belonged to them, stupid me, I always thought that wildlife were just that “wild” not “domestic”.
    Just for fun, I looked up the $ paid to Driskill and Jensen for hunt seasons 2019-2022. The landowner coupons submitted by Jensen Ranch for deer for those 4 years totaled $10,112 or 632 deer. I could only find 1 payment to Bear Lodge Cattle for the 2021 season for $592 or 126 deer. That doesn’t include any $$ passed between outfitters and landowners. Draw your own conclusions….
    Wyo G&F had a chance to actually be pro-active in management of this area for the 2023 hunt season. The original proposal for these areas hunt season was to reduce the season to Nov 1-15. It’s my understanding that there was too much pressure applied from outfitters and guides not liking the shortened season, so Wyo G&F caved and set the season at Nov 1-17. Yes, shorter than previous years, but….
    And, yes, there are just too many hunters in too small an area.
    Wyo G&F is fond of saying that they manage the hunt areas for “hunter satisfaction” but if you really look beyond the smoke and mirrors, IMHO they manage it more for revenue to their coffers, while both wildlife and hunters get shorted.

    1. Correction: $592 equates to 37 deer, not 126. Perhaps we should have some kind of “spell check” for math also. Sorry for the error.

  3. As a non-resident my party of 4 stopped coming to the Black Hills area in 2018. There were simply to many hunters concentrated in one area and the deer were feeling the pressure and dispersing to private land. For private areas with to many deer your only solution is to offer doe hunts but most land owners don’t want the hassle of strangers on their land which I understand. We have the same issue in my home state. The concentration of hunters on state land is overwhelming while farm country gets hammered by large numbers of deer because there’s no pressure and agriculture for them to browse on. I hope the state can work with landowners to come up with a solution. I miss coming out to the Black Hills, we always had a great time.

  4. Import some of our huge whitetails, we have an overabundance of them .. healthy..vibrant and would mean new bloodlines for your existing population.

  5. Isn’t anyone going to talk about what is causing such drought in Wyoming nope I suppose you don’t want to discuss the clean drinking water exemptions Wyoming receives from the EPA either…..

  6. Maybe reduce non resident deer tags for Black Hills area. I’m a non resident n I’d b in favor of that. I hunted north of Hulett in 2021. Only saw 5 deer in 3 days. Also saw some nonresident hunters shooting small 2×2 muledeer. Maybe a point restriction would help.

  7. Wolf predation and CWD reduction have no common proven link. Wolves have not been in this area of Wyoming for 90 years. CWD was created at a wildlife research facility at CSU in the 1970’s. There is no direct science that supports wolves reduce CWD in deer populations. A mathematical model has been developed that might support this hypothesis, but it is purely mathematical and theoretical. The weather forecast is based on mathematical models and how accurate is the weather report? It is not a definitive link.

    I’m not arguing we do not have a problem with deer populations in the state, they are in decline, but it is a multitude of issues with the biggest common denominator being CWD. Other diseases, drought, urban sprawl, increased predator populations also play significant factors. I am surprised WyoFile which prides itself on the “facts” allows unsupported statements that lack any scientific support to be posted.

    1. While I agree with what you say, I can’t see what there is to be gained by introducing predators to an already stressed and dwindling population of existing deer. That is if you believe the numbers because I see no deer anywhere or antelope either in any areas I hunted as a boy, this include the sage grouse, pheasants, chukars the fishing all of it not just the deer elk and moose. So I think your statement when carefully considered lacks attention the rest of the species in Wyoming and surrounding states are suffering

  8. “Wolves” That’s blasphemy! Insight can be gained from other predators. Studies from the front range in Colorado showed mule deer killed by mountain lions were more likely to be infected with CWD than mule deer killed by hunters. Also studies in Yellowstone showed that by wolves reducing populations and thinning out weak and sick animals they have created a healthy, resilient elk population. I grew up on a ranch at 9,000 ft. in the Colorado Rockies and depended on wild game to survive. When I went out hunting I didn’t kill an injured or sick animal, unlike a natural predator, I killed the healthiest, strongest animal with the best future genetic potential. I quit hunting thirty years ago.

  9. What suspect this is a disease that would normally be controlled by wolf predation. Wolves would be selectively eliminating diseased individual deer and preventing the congregation of deer around watering holes. Like Wyoming is so anti-wolf that they are loosing half of their deer population because of their prejudice. They are also risking their whole hunting and cattle industry due to not allowing wolves to control the spread of chronic wasting disease in their elk population. Wolves have been shown to be the only method that controls CWD. In CWD gets into the cattle their whole ranching industry is doomed. What is needed is for why am I to get smart on the presence of wolves and their importantance in protecting both their wildlife and domestic animals from the spread of disease.

    1. I can’t under stand why some think wolves and bears are the answer since they have been introduced in northwestern Wyoming you do not have game numbers like it was before Actually the game and fish have been cutting down harvest quotas and even closing areas to hunting . You don’t see deer or elk anymore . I see grass 3 ft tall, willows and deciduous trees over grown and very little sign of wildlife and being told it’s over grazing and drought .

      1. I could not agree with you more. I don’t know weather to believe these arm chair experts sitting with their laptop. Or my lying eyes… there aren’t any deer antelope elk sage grouse pheasants or even fish left here I quit hunting years ago because I felt guilty for slaughtering animals that are having serious issues surviving the predators ,disease and poachers

    2. Maybe some education and research about the science of keystone species and trophic cascade might help some of you understand how predators and/or ungulates can affect the environment. An easy assignment would be to watch Nature on PBS, The Serengeti Rules, season 38, episode 2. Or just google ‘The Wolves of Yellowstone” and watch a short video on the 20 year scientific study of the wolves impact in Yellowstone. You can also google the time lapse photos of Yellowstone from outer space that show the change in vegetation and the flow of the Yellowstone river. I am 74 years old and grew up an a cattle ranch high in the Colorado mountains. I have spent years trekking and immersing myself in the wilderness of the Rocky Mountains from Canada to New Mexico with a few years in Alaska. Becoming a surgical nurse “RN” in my twenties allowed me to travel and live in these wonderful places. It also trained me to do the scientific research and educate myself when I had questions about the environment. If you would like more sources of scientific research ask.

  10. That was way too many deer in too small a place. Food and water supply was over taxed. Yes Rancher was there to benifit off the wildlife but done nothing to help on situation.

  11. Driskill will complain whether the deer populations are up or down. I’m not really sure, after speaking personally with him, that he knows what he wants. My guess is he wants to manage deer himself on his property along with his outfitter. As far as splitting the species, the G&F already can manage these two species separately with seasons and types of licenses. If the deer are statutorily split, it will be mule deer that suffer the consequences.

  12. This is a question for Ogden Driskill. Why do you want to separate the whitetail from the mule deer? I see no benefit to that. The game and fish basically manage them separately statewide now with type 3 licenses and season dates. If they did separate them, I could see increased hunting pressure on mule deer which is absolutely a negative for mule deer.