Yellowstone bear interrupts bear-safety interview

CODY โ€” A cable TV news crew taping a segment on bear safety Friday in Yellowstone National Park got a little something extra in the bargain: a close encounter with a bear.

โ€œThat was what we refer to as an incident within an incident,โ€ park spokesman Dan Hottle said Monday, joking that he worried some might think the encounter was staged.

Hottle had taken the crew from CNN to Joffe Lake โ€” a five-minute drive from park headquarters in Mammoth Hot Springs โ€” where they were interviewing Yellowstone bear biologist Kerry Gunther.

The parkโ€™s public affairs office has received hundreds of media inquiries since the fatal mauling Wednesday of a hiker who apparently surprised a mother grizzly that was foraging with two six-month-old cubs.

Brian Matayoshi, 57, of Torrance, Calif., was killed while hiking with his wife, Marylyn, on the Wapiti Lake trail. It was the first fatal bear attack in Yellowstone since 1986.

So park visitors were still on high alert Friday when someone spotted a black bear at Joffe Lake, a popular fishing spot for brook trout and a convenient backdrop for Gunther to explain how to behave during a bear encounter.

โ€œSomeone shouted, โ€˜Bear! Bear!’โ€ Hottle said, recalling the incident.

Hottle wanted to make sure hiker Erin Prophet saw the nearby black bear as it ambled toward the 2.5-acre pond.

โ€œDoes the hiker know?โ€ Hottle shouted back, as a videocamera captured the unfolding drama.

As Prophet backed away from the bear, she found herself wading into the pond, wondering whether to swim for the far shore.

Dave Beecham, in a nearby kayak with his young son and his father-in-law, paddled over to help Prophet swim away from the bear.

Although the bear never charged and did not appear to be directly threatening her, Prophet told the camera crew that she was scared, and glad for the help.

โ€œI was pretty afraid,โ€ she said.

โ€œWhen the guys in the kayak offered to pull me across, that seemed like a better plan because the bear seemed like it wanted to be down there by the edge,โ€ Prophet said.

Beecham was visiting the park from Oregon, and later told KGW news of Portland that he felt compelled to help, but he was also โ€œafraid the grizzly bear was going to come after us.โ€

Hottle said the black bear, initially misidentified as a juvenile grizzly, was not interested in Prophet, and was just trying to get to the water.

Hottle said the incident would have gone unheralded were it not for the presence of news cameras in the wake of Wednesdayโ€™s mauling.

He said Gunther had hoped to use the national platform of a CNN segment to offer common-sense advice on staying safe in bear country, but the resulting segment instead focused mostly on the kayak โ€œrescue.โ€ Local news outlets in Beechamโ€™s home state of Oregon picked up the story and also played up the rescue angle.

Park officials have continued to stress how rare grizzly attacks are, and say that Yellowstone averages only approximately one bear-related injury each year. Gunther said during a press conference last week that Wednesdayโ€™s fatal mauling was a โ€œ1-in-3-millionโ€ chance encounter.

While most visitors to the area seemed unlikely to change their plans based on news of the fatal attack, it was a hot topic in tourist towns near the park.

Sales of bear spray were up sharply at a camping supply store in Cody, near the parkโ€™s East Entrance.

โ€œPeople are definitely talking about it when they come in,โ€ said Amber Bryant of Sunlight Sports. โ€œSome people have actually changed their minds and decided not to go hiking at all.โ€

Bryant said that most customers, though, are heading to the backcountry as planned.

โ€œThe bears have been there long before people,โ€ she said.

Contact Ruffin Prevost at 307-213-9321 or ruffin@wyofile.com.

DOWNLOAD a 1998 paper by Yellowstone bear biologist Kerry Gunther on the differences between grizzly bears and black bears.


REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name โ€” first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFileโ€™s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • Weโ€™re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on whatโ€™s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when theyโ€™re submitted โ€” or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. Weโ€™ll get to it when weโ€™re back in the office.
  • Weโ€™re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenterโ€™s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. Weโ€™ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If thatโ€™s going to upset you, itโ€™s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We donโ€™t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please donโ€™t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments โ€” maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *