In the last five years, three former prison guards at the Wyoming Women’s Center in Lusk have been convicted of sexually assaulting female inmates.

One of those women is now suing in federal court, arguing that the sexual violence she experienced was the result of “deliberate indifference to the rights and safety of inmates” by the prison’s staff and leadership. 

The lawsuit — filed in Wyoming’s U.S. District Court in August — names Joseph Gaul, a former correctional officer, alongside WWC Warden Timothy Lang and Deputy Warden Robert Hardy. Five John Does are also listed as defendants whom the plaintiff could not name but believes were WWC employees. 

In 2023, Gaul admitted to inappropriate sexual contact with the plaintiff, Chasity Jacobs. Soon thereafter, he pleaded guilty to second-degree sexual assault and was sentenced to two to five years in prison. 

Before he was hired to work at the Women’s Center in 2019, Gaul was terminated from at least two public-sector jobs in Nebraska due to misconduct toward women, according to the lawsuit. 

In 2019, while serving as the director of the Scotts Bluff County Detention Center in Nebraska, Gaul was placed on administrative leave and subsequently fired for sending sexually explicit text messages to a female subordinate, the complaint states. 

While the Scottsbluff Star-Herald reported on Gaul’s dismissal at the time, the reason for his termination wasn’t made public after county commissioners met in closed session. 

Before his time at the Nebraska detention center, Gaul was also fired from the Nebraska Health and Human Services for inappropriate interactions with female colleagues and sexually inappropriate comments, according to the lawsuit. 

The Wyoming Department of Corrections is required to conduct background and reference checks before hiring any correctional officer.

But when it came to Gaul’s hiring, the lawsuit alleges “these requirements were either ignored or improperly conducted.”

The Wyoming Department of Corrections declined WyoFile’s request for comment, citing its policy not to comment on pending litigation. 

A photo of the Wyoming Women’s Center in Lusk, the state’s only women’s prison. (Wyoming Department of Corrections website)

The lawsuit also argues that Gaul’s conduct was not an isolated incident, “but part of a longstanding pattern of misconduct by male correctional officers at the WWC.”

It points to two other former guards who were convicted of sexual assault of an inmate — one in 2020, another earlier this year. 

“The pervasive problem of sexual assault by WWC correctional officers was well known to prison administrators including, specifically, Defendants Lang and Hardy,” according to the lawsuit. “Despite this, Defendant Lang, and other supervisory personnel failed to implement safeguards or address the systematic breakdowns in hiring, training, reporting, or accountability that enabled repeated sexual abuse.” 

Details

Jacobs was arrested on felony charges when she was 19 years old and began serving a 25-to-35-year sentence in Lusk in 2020, according to the lawsuit. 

In 2023, she was segregated from the main prison population and employed as a janitorial worker with restricted movement. It was during this time that she often encountered Gaul in unsupervised areas. 

“Gaul used his position of authority to cultivate familiarity with inmates,” including the plaintiff, according to the lawsuit. “He routinely overshared personal information, including details about his failing marriage, and offered special privileges to select inmates.”

The following section contains graphic details. — Eds.

In July 2023, while Jacobs was performing cleaning duties, Gaul isolated her in a chemical closet where he raped her, according to the complaint. 

The plaintiff, “who is substantially smaller than Defendant Gaul, was physically overpowered, frightened, and unable to resist. She froze in fear and was unable to cry out or escape,” the lawsuit states. 

Shortly after the assault, according to the lawsuit, another inmate overheard Gaul ask Jacobs, “Did I cum in you?”

About one week later, Gaul assaulted Jacobs for the second time in a different unsupervised area of the prison. 

Wyoming Department of Corrections internal affairs and the Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation began a formal investigation on Aug. 3, 2023, when Gaul was reported. 

Gaul had a duty to protect the plaintiff, the lawsuit states, but he “utterly failed” and his conduct “constitutes excessive force and cruel and unusual punishment in violation” of Jacobs’ constitutional rights. 

Furthermore, Gaul’s violent conduct was part of a pattern, the lawsuit argues. 

“Multiple sexual assaults have been investigated internally by WDOC rather than immediately referred to outside law enforcement, undermining accountability and potentially concealing the full scope of abuse,” the filing states. “Investigations are often incomplete, shielded by internal review procedures, and rarely result in systematic reform or staff discipline beyond the individual perpetrator.” 

The complaint points to Kyle Broberg, a former correctional officer, who was convicted in 2020 of sexually abusing an inmate in secluded areas of the WWC, as well as Kenneth Jensen, a former supervisory correctional officer. 

Jensen was tasked with overseeing an inmate maintenance crew. While in this supervisory role, Jensen systematically manipulated, groomed, and sexually abused an inmate in September 2024, according to the lawsuit. 

The three recent prosecutions and convictions are likely an undercount, the lawsuit alleges. 

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. My niece is an inmate at WWC. Her safety is my number one concern because she is able to share her challenges with her family when we visit, and we are very worried. I cannot write more without compromising her. The state needs to do an exhaustive investigation and do whatever is necessary to ensure inmates’ safety. They do not deserve to live with the daily threat of sexual assault while they pay their debt to society. Will imprisoned women ever be safe or will the state ignore their role?

  2. What absolute BS. 2 to 5 years? A pattern of assaults? Every person involved, those who had knowledge of this and those who did not do their job in vetting these people should do 30 years. This is why all of their prior transgressions should be public knowledge.