Banned Books Week, which wraps up Saturday, has long been a time to celebrate the freedom to read and the value of open access to ideas. This year, in Wyoming, that freedom is under direct threat.

Opinion

The Wyoming Legislature’s Joint Judiciary Committee, bolstered by the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, will meet at 9:30 a.m. on Monday to consider a bill that would ban “sexually explicit materials” from school libraries and from areas in public libraries accessible to individuals under 18.

Libraries would be fined $50,000 per violation. The bill would allow anyone to sue a library if they believe the policy has been violated. At the October meeting, the committee may entertain amendments to the current bill, possibly exempting materials designed for sex education purposes and sacred texts such as the Bible. Yes, the Bible would be banned under this law. They could lower the fine and may also define an appeal process for libraries. But the real problem with the bill is that it isn’t needed in Wyoming.

We already have robust obscenity laws. What’s new, and dangerous, is the attempt to impose a narrow moral standard on all Wyoming families, regardless of their own values. Parents absolutely have the right to guide their children’s reading, but they shouldn’t decide what other people’s children can or cannot read. This bill would force librarians into the role of moral gatekeepers, while threatening them and our libraries with financial ruin for doing their jobs.

Here in Wyoming, we know the value of our library. It’s not just a place to check out books; it’s a space that supports our kids’ learning, fosters community engagement and provides access to information for residents across the spectrum. 

Decisions about access should reflect local values, not political agendas. Librarians are trained professionals with the best interests of children in mind. Wyomingites should not have their access limited by the government or state legislation. Decisions about library access should come from local library boards and local school boards, with input from the community.

The American Library Association documents “an extremist campaign” to ban or restrict access to books in this display in the lobby of the Teton County Library. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

The proponents of this legislation say they aren’t banning books; they just want them to be “shelved appropriately.” But restricting access to a book is, in effect, a ban. The egregious proposed fine would not only have a chilling effect on free speech, but a freezing effect on any county budget faced with the possibility of such a fine, or even the cost of defending against such a lawsuit.

Wyoming’s proposed legislation includes a fine twenty times larger than the $2,500 fine attached to a similar bill that passed the Idaho Legislature but was vetoed by Gov. Brad Little, who deemed it fiscally irresponsible. Little stated that the penalty “will only increase the costs local libraries incur, particularly rural libraries. These costs will be forced onto property taxpayers of Idaho or cause libraries to close to minors altogether.” On the second attempt, the bill passed with a fine of $250. Even with the reduced fine, small rural libraries in Idaho have decided to restrict or eliminate access to patrons under 18 to comply with the legislation, just as small rural libraries in Wyoming may be forced to do.

Beyond the cost, the legislation is likely unconstitutional. Wyoming law already mirrors the U.S. Supreme Court’s definition of obscenity under Miller v. California, which requires that material must be patently offensive and lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. The new bill makes no effort to align with that legal standard. It uses broad, undefined terms like “sexually explicit,” which could sweep in countless works of literature — including titles that have won prestigious awards and helped generations of young readers understand themselves and the world.

This year, during Banned Books Week, I find myself grieving. Grieving the erosion of First Amendment protections in a state that prides itself on personal liberty. Grieving the pressure placed on local libraries, already stretched thin by funding cuts. Libraries have long been one of the most trusted civic institutions in America, places that provide enrichment and opportunity at every stage of life.

I also will be fighting. I will protest this legislation in memory of my mother, who grew up on a homestead 15 miles north of Medicine Bow, and who told me that the best day of every month was when the Albany County Library’s box of books arrived with the mailman. I will insist on the freedom to read and to encourage my children to read books that challenge, comfort and inspire. In that spirit, I just ordered the three most-banned books in the country today.

Wyoming is a place that values education, individuality and freedom. We should stand up against this unnecessary and dangerous legislation. Our libraries must remain open, inclusive and reflective of the diverse community they serve, not the political whims of a vocal few.

Marylee White is currently the Chair of the Teton County Library Board. She has spent lots of time in libraries in Greybull where she was born, in Worland where she went to high school, in Laramie while...

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. If you are fighting for a library book that features cartoon drawings of children having anal sex and instruction on how to give fellatio, etc, you are not in the right side of history, you are a pawn for groomers who convinced you their “kink” is your battleground.

    As a secondary note, if you are fighting for an ideological stance, and you are supported by the mainstream media, you are not a revolutionary, you are not fighting against “the man”, you are simply a puppet of groomer millionaires who have you thinking you are on the right side of history. When in reality, you are a political, anti-American (or ANTI-FirstAmmendment, ANTIFA) terrorist.

    Wyoming is about freedom. There are still real Americans here. If you want to be a communist, there are plenty of states who will let you soak in their sickness.

    I would be surprised if Wyofile allowed my comment, but as they do say they stand for freedom, let’s see if they truly do.

  2. So tell me why you want individuals under 18 to have access to material their parents may not want them to have access to? Do we let people under 18, join the military or get a piercing without their parents permission? It would be idiotic to walk around saying society has BANNED a 17 year old from military service. They just need their parents permission. Do we even let them rent a car or cut off their own priva.. oh wait… you probably DO support a child’s “right” to self mutilation without their parents knowledge. The point is, the books are still available for adults to check out for their children and explain them in context to align with their personal moral values. Liberals like to blur definitions of words, like saying a woman can have a penis, so I’m not surprised you’re confused about what the word restricted vs banned means so I’ll help you all out. Restricted means to LIMIT access to to something due to qualifications, age, maturity etc. Banned means all access is denied regardless of any qualifications. Therefore, you’re lying saying it a ban. So why do you lie? My freedom of speech isn’t restricted at all by these bans as I am able to challenge your lies on the open field of ideas and tear them down. If you love extremist views there are plenty of other states that will cater to your liberal perversions.

  3. It’s a shame that Libraries are no longer just a place to read books. They have become a battlefield of political ideologies.
    Censorship and Promotion of certain ideas are “crimes” being committed by both sides in this war.

    1. Nope, Chad. Not “both sides” banning books, restricting access to library books. Not “both sides”. Just the GOP Taliban.

      1. Drag queen Story time, alternative sexual lifestyles, etc. PROMOTED to kids as young as preschoolers is as bad or worse than censorship.

        Weimar Berlin created lead to the book burnings, the same way drag queen story time has given you your “gop taliban”.

  4. Marylee White you are my hero. We needed you in Sheridan last week at the banned book roundtable to discuss the School Boards policy on book banning. The high-school librarian told me that only 3 books out of 40,000 books have been banned and “that’s really good odds”. Yes, the odds are good at the cost of freedom of speech being denied. No books in our local library have been banned.

  5. I just saw news of Terri Lesley ( former Campbell county library director) winning a 700k settlement with said county. She was fired for NOT banning books. I don’t know the details, but look forward to WyoFile covering the story.

  6. The WY Republican Party has lost its way. Taxpayer money is wasted by the state legislature working to meddle in our personal lives. Meanwhile, mineral revenues are drying up and no elected official shows any interest in planning for how to fund schools and infrastructure in the future, or even in the present. Leave the librarians alone already! Let them do their jobs. As a parent, any book my child chooses at the library is the very least of my worries.

  7. Oh you rugged Wyoming individuals, take your thumb out of your mouth and stand up for freedom. Vote the radical right out of office.