CHEYENNE—Lawmakers got a dose of déjà vu Monday when dozens of committee bills came to an abrupt end after failing to pass an introductory vote. 

The legislative casualties included five property-tax bills, seven measures aimed at reshaping elections, a bill to dismantle the Wyoming Business Council and an extensive proposal dictating how the state pays for public schools. 

In even-numbered years, when lawmakers are tasked with crafting the state’s next two-year budget, all other legislation must receive an initial two-thirds approval to move forward. The high bar makes it easier for a minority of lawmakers to tank legislation not to their liking. 

Such was the case during the last budget session in 2024, when the Wyoming Freedom Caucus did not have the House majority it does now, but did have a voting bloc big enough to halt 13 committee bills

At the time, the caucus called the move a way to shift “policy more in line with conservative values.” Other lawmakers lamented the wasted extra time and money that go into crafting committee bills during the legislative offseason. It was once a legislative tradition to prioritize committee bills over individually sponsored measures since they go through an extended vetting process in the off-season months, but that’s changed in recent years. 

Monday, the shoe appeared to be on the other foot. A total of 33 committee bills died on introduction. Twenty-one of those were House bills. Most were the work of Freedom Caucus members and allies. 

Wyoming Freedom Caucus Chairman Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, R-Cody, speaks early Monday, Feb. 9, 2026, inside the Capitol rotunda in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

“For years, Insiders have treated committee bills as untouchable. Today, RINOS and Dems teamed up to kill election integrity bills sponsored by now-conservative [House Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions] Committee,” the Freedom Caucus posted on social media. 

“Turns out they never really cared about the bills being committee bills. They’re just leftists,” the caucus said. 

The stricken election-related legislation included a ban on ballot drop boxes, a prohibition on ballot collecting and an increased requirement for independent candidates to appear on the general election ballot. 

Ahead of the legislative session, WyoFile asked Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette, if the Freedom Caucus was concerned its priorities would not make it past introduction and what, if anything, the group was doing to whip votes. 

Bear said he could not speak for the caucus — he’s no longer its chairman — but said he wasn’t worried. 

“It’s an election year,” Bear said. “If those people want to block the stuff that the people want, they’ll pay a heavy price.”

All House districts are up for reelection in 2026 as are odd-numbered Senate districts.

Meanwhile, the Freedom Caucus did not green light every committee bill. Instead, the group’s members and allies teamed up to block three bills sponsored by the Joint Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee. 

One of those bills would have created a user fee for mountain bike riders at state parks to fund trail-building and infrastructure projects. Another bill would have enabled the State Museum in Cheyenne to charge an admission fee. The third piece of legislation sought to earmark gaming funds for the Wyoming outdoor recreation and tourism trust. 
Additionally, Reps. Bear, Jeremy Haroldson, R-Wheatland, Scott Heiner, R-Green River, Jayme Lien, R-Casper, Ann Lucas, R-Cheyenne, J.R. Riggins, R-Casper, and Scott Smith, R-Lingle, broke from the caucus to tank a bill based on “chemtrail” claims that the federal government is sterilizing soils and blocking the sun.

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Maybe the Freedom Caucus should put forth bills that actually improve the quality of life in Wyoming and they could get some bills passed.

  2. Seems like when the freedom caucus can’t get what they want. They say it’s libs, rhinos seems like they have a bad case of woke derangement syndrome. They can’t just look in the mirror.

  3. Poor boo boo bear says we will pay for committees tanking their crappy freedumb caucus bills. Hopefully Wyoming voter will dump freedumb caucus and bring back integrity to Wyoming. Oh and it was cold enough this morning I could see my chemtrail.

  4. It’s interesting how the FC can squash committee bills and they are making the world right. When it happens to them they, call the “no voters” Rhinos and Libs, and screech like a mashed cat. I believe that’s called Karma!

  5. What the people want Mr. Bear, is a budget session without a special session. Special sessions cost taxpayer dollars. As a taxpayer and voter, I’d like to see my money go to more tangible things. Some of these “bills” can wait until next year’s general session.

  6. Quite ironic how Rachel R.W., a very vocal opponent of abortion, denies and looks away from the troubles her hero, Trump is in regarding the Epstein files. You’d think that someone with a strong anti-abortion sentiment would be appalled by the Chump/Lutnick/Prince Andrew/Epstein & Co. etc. abusing and exploiting 9 to 10 year old little girls. Must be a desire to keep producing victims by banning abortion. You cant have it both ways

  7. Me thinks that the Freedom Caucus will soon be known as the UnFreedom Carcass as it looks like a high majority of their bills have been found beside the road, dead.

  8. I find it interesting the the chairperson of the Freedom Caucus Rachel Rodriguez-Williams is from California. She recently was concerned that professors at UW were from the east and west coast. The thought that the Freedom caucus speaks for Wyoming may look good to many but I urge Wyoming residents to look deeper into their ideals.

    1. Yep, she’s your typical unhinged Left Coast lib with a desire to be a big fish in a small pond. Couldn’t hack it in Cali so let’s move to lil’ ole’ Wyoming and pretend to be a diehard conservative. Rachel is not the first Cali loon to attempt this masquerade and she’ll eventually fall like all of the other poseurs before her. An extremely viable, common sense and very well thought of local in Cody will be announcing a 2026 mid-term run against her soon. Rod/Williams best quit while she’s ahead or face an extremely embarrassing trouncing at the polls come June.

      1. Here’s looking at you Chuck Gray; another Steven Miller wannabe from California cosplaying as a cowboy. You are correct that we have many juvenile, psychologically stunted folk aligning with the so-called Freedom Caucus, and showing total servile and sycophantic allegiance to Trump and his ilk. It’s a sad commentary on our populace that these people get voted into public office.

  9. It looks like the parasitic UnFreeDumb Clownage is slowly getting ground to slimy particles, like stepping on a cockroach and slowly gyrating the sole of your boot

  10. These complaints are silly. Maybe the Freedom Caucus should learn a thing or two about persuasion and compromise.