House and Senate to haggle over hikes in Hathaway scholarships

By Ron Feemster
— February 25, 2014

The Joint Interim Education Committee sponsored Senate File 55 to raise all three levels of Hathaway scholarship awards by 10 percent. But during floor debate, the Senate cut the increases to 5 percent. Now the House Education Committee has voted to restore the 10 percent increase, a move that sets the stage for conference committee negotiations, should the bill pass as amended in the House.

“It was an amendment on the floor,” said Hank Coe (R-Cody), chair of the Senate Education Committee, who testified before the House committee Monday evening just after the House adjourned for the day. “I think actuarially, the Hathaway fund is strong enough to absorb the 10 [percent]. There was a discussion on the floor: ‘Four or five years down the road if things are not good, what are we going to do if we’ve got this increase in there?’ I’m here to tell you that I’d respect and appreciate it if you’d take it back to 10 percent.”

The Senate could vote to concur with the House amendment and restore the 10-percent hike in the scholarships. If not, the matter will be taken up in a conference committee.

Testifying for the University of Wyoming, Mike Massie noted that the top “Honors” level of the Hathaway scholarship covered 91 percent of the cost of tuition at the University of Wyoming in 2006 and only covers 73 percent today, which increases the gap a student must cover by 18 percent.

The “Performance” and “Opportunity” levels have added gaps of 14 percent and 10 percent in their tuition purchasing power, Massie said.

Wyoming high school students who graduate with a 3.5 GPA and score at least 25 on the ACT standardized test receive the “Honors” award of $1,600 a semester from the Hathaway fund. A 3.0 GPA and a score of 21 qualify a student for a “Performance” award of $1,200 a semester. The “Opportunity” award of $800 goes to students who maintain a 2.5 GPA and score 19 on the ACT.

“The Hathaway was set up as a way of taking windfall profits of a boom era to benefit students in perpetuity,” Massie said in an interview after the committee meeting. “The program increases access to college and serves as an incentive for high school students to get better grades. If they perform, the state helps with tuition costs.”

Since the program started in 2006, the percentage of students qualifying for the Honors level has increased from 41 percent to 47 percent, Massie told the committee.

“The program challenged students,” Massie said. “And students responded.”

Both the amendment to raise the scholarship increase to 10 percent and the bill itself passed out of committee by votes of 9-0.

The House committee also passed Senate File 13 by 9-0. The bill would allow students to use their Hathaway money for short summer school courses and mini-courses in January before second term starts. This was allowed in practice, but the bill anchors in statute the students’ right to spend the money for short courses.

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.