A bill set for consideration at next week’s legislative budget session would enable Wyoming to offload its valuable “Kelly Parcel” — a square mile of state land locked within the boundaries of Grand Teton National Park.
The sticker price for a straight sale, however, is an eye-opener.
Reps. Tom Walter (R-Casper), Steve Harshman (R-Casper), Lloyd Larsen (R-Lander) and Sen. Bill Landen (R-Casper) on Wednesday introduced House Bill 121 – Kelly parcel-sale and leasing requirements, which demands a buyer pay no less than $750 million in cash for the 640 acres. The parcel of land was last appraised at $62.4 million in July 2022 — or a twelfth of the minimum set by the bill.
The legislation also leaves the door open for other temporary and permanent solutions to the Kelly Parcel saga, which has garnered national publicity. One option permitted by HB 121 would be to lease the land for conservation purposes, with the caveat that lease payments be for no less than $6 million annually.
Pressure to dispose of or maximize income from the Kelly Parcel comes from the Wyoming Constitution, which stipulates the Office of State Lands and Investments maximize returns from the section — and 3.4 million acres of other trust lands — in support of the state’s public schools. Recently, the Kelly Parcel hasn’t contributed much to that cause, generating roughly $3,000 annually from a grazing lease and permits for a cattle chute, guided mountain biking tours and a horseback ride-cookout operation.
House Bill 121 would also permit the Wyoming State Board of Land Commissioners to trade the Kelly Parcel to the federal government. An authorized trade — an idea unsuccessfully tried before — would have to return at least $1 billion in mineral rights, either coal in northeast Wyoming, trona in southwest Wyoming or a combination of the two, according to the legislation. Those mineral valuations would have to be appraised by the Office of State Lands and Investments.
Wyoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder spoke optimistically about a trade for mineral rights in December, moments before the State Board of Land Commissioners pressed pause on a proposal to put the land to auction.
“This is not a new concept,” Degenfelder said. “In fact it was explored nearly a decade ago by a group of individuals.”
The Office of State Lands and Investments pursued putting the land to auction partly because the Wyoming Legislature has stood in the way of a sale. Under the Wyoming Constitution, lawmakers must sign off on a direct sale. In 2021, legislators approved a Harshman amendment to a Kelly Parcel sale bill that set the floor price at $3.2 billion — some 82 times the appraised value at the time.
Harshman, a HB 121 co-sponsor, signed his name to legislation in 2024 that brings the asking price down significantly. Still, $750 million would be a reach to come up with for the U.S. Department of Interior and its nonprofit partners. By law, the federal government cannot pay more than the appraised value of $62.4 million. The balance would have to come from other sources, and HB 121 does allow the State Board of Land Commissioners to “accept funds from another entity on behalf of the purchaser of the Kelly parcel.”
House Bill 121 also allows for Kelly Parcel payments to be made over time, provided the land is sold to “a single person” and that the transaction is completed by a specified time.
The Grand Teton National Park Foundation raised money to help purchase Wyoming-owned inholdings in the park before. In 2016, the nonprofit partner to the park raised $23 million to enable the sale of a 640-acre state tract in the Antelope Flats area.
If HB 121’s floor sale price of $750 million remains intact and the legislation passes, the Grand Teton National Park Foundation would be on the hook to come up with significantly more cash. Even if the U.S. Department of the Interior contributed the maximum allowed amount — $62.4 million — that leaves $687.6 million that would still have to be procured to meet lawmakers’ demands.
Neither Walter, Harshman, Larsen nor Landen could be reached by WyoFile before this story published late Wednesday.
The Wyoming Legislature’s 2024 budget session starts Monday.
Keep in mind that a NY Court fined former President Trump a half $$$ Billion, just for some transitory building valuations on paper. Wyoming legislators anguish over the dollar value of the magnificent gift of earth from God’s hands in the Tetons, but the amounts they are considering are a pittance. The “Kelly Parcel” is 640 irreplaceable acres that should be preserved for future generations of all Americans, and for the world. If Teddy Roosevelt was with us today, that’s what he would do without hesitation – “in a New York minute”.
While Teton County wants to build a $50 million private jet lounge right in the middle of the park, next to the Tetons on sage grouse habitat. Critical wildlife habitat seems to have become code for critical rich-people habitat, even in nat. parks. Must be some good tax-dodging and money-laundering going on in the Tetons.
As an addition to my last comment, look what Zion National Park just added to the Kolob area of the park. Good news to read this morning.
https://www.kuer.org/health-science-environment/2024-02-05/picking-up-a-piece-of-private-land-zion-national-park-adds-to-its-protected-acres
I do understand the mandate siting State Lands are to provide funds to produce income to support public schools and other state institutions named in the original grants. I just can’t believe folks are willing to sell some of Wyoming’s nationally/worldly treasured lands to the highest bidders, no matter the millions which could be garnered. Besides the exceptional, exquisite nature of the land, are they really willing to have millions of people hold Wyoming in such disgust and dismay? Aren’t these some of the same folks who treasure tourist dollars? I just don’t get it.