CHEYENNE—State lawmakers continued work this week to address funding for Wyoming’s K-12 public education system, attempting to close shortfalls identified by courts in critical areas, including school safety, nutrition and technology.

The Legislature’s Select Committee on School Finance Recalibration heard testimony and public comment on how to tackle these issues.

In February 2025, Laramie County District Court Judge Peter Froelicher issued a 186-page order finding that the Wyoming Legislature had unconstitutionally underfunded public schools. The judge ruled that the state failed to provide sufficient resources for key areas, such as nutritional programs, school resource officers and technology.

The state appealed the decision to the Wyoming Supreme Court, which issued a stay pausing the lower court’s mandate while the state’s appeal proceeds. When the committee began its work, the stay had not yet been issued, and no final ruling has been made to date.

Co-Chair Sen. Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, expects the court to pay attention to the committee’s actions in the coming months.

On Tuesday and Wednesday, the committee heard from consultants with Picus Odden and Associates, who presented proposals to ensure these programs are funded in compliance with the state Constitution.

School safety

The court order determined that “all Wyoming public school students are entitled to the benefit of SROs.” Not every school is required to have its own full-time school resource officer, but the order does require students to have access to SRO services.

Picus Odden estimated that 172.5 SRO positions are necessary to meet the requirements, at a cost of $15.8 million annually for personnel alone, and $17.1 million annually in total, including professional development, equipment and supplies.

The model, based on the recommendations provided by Picus Odden, proposed one SRO for each high school, one for every two middle schools and one for every three elementary schools.

During interviews, school district personnel emphasized how professional development allows SROs to work effectively and the necessary equipment allows them to perform their responsibilities.

Currently, school districts contract with local sheriff’s offices or police departments to provide SRO services.

Teton County Sheriff’s Office School Resource Officer Andrew Roundy lets Jackson Hole High School seniors back into school during the lunch hour in March 2018. As a resource officer, Roundy was present at the school whenever students were in the building, as well as during special local events. (Ryan Dorgan/Jackson Hole News&Guide)

Manny Fardella, a Cheyenne Police Department officer and president of the Wyoming School Resource Officers Association, spoke on behalf of SROs in the state and about his experience in Laramie County. He disagreed with the notion that SROs are simply there to be security.

“Our school resource officers are more than a security guard. We become part of a school family. To many, we become members, trusted people,” he said.

Jeremy Smith, the business manager for Sheridan District 1, spoke about making sure this funding would not be categorical, meaning that it could only be spent on SROs. Smith stressed that this funding could also be put toward additional district-specific safety needs.

The committee requested that a bill be drafted based on Picus Odden’s recommendations, but did not include professional development or equipment.

Food service programs

The court’s ruling determined that the school funding model not including a nutrition component was unconstitutional because “nutrition is an essential component of a quality education.”

To remedy this, Picus Odden’s proposed options would ensure all students have adequate access to food by covering the difference between food service revenues and expenditures. The consultant’s research estimated the difference during the 2024-25 school year was $17.8 million.

The first proposed option was to provide employee benefits such as health insurance and retirement contributions to food service staff, as they are currently excluded from both. This option would cover about $9 million in district food service costs.

This option would only cover about half of the current statewide difference and would provide limited or no support to districts that contract for food services, meaning it would have to be combined with another option.

The second option would reimburse districts a fixed percentage of food service expenditures; reimbursement rates vary from 10% to 30%. The state could set the rate to reflect the difference between revenues and expenditures statewide.

However, due to the difference varying widely by district, this approach would not cover the difference for 29 of the state’s 48 districts.

The combination of options one and two would leave shortfalls in 25 districts uncovered, according to Picus Odden.

Fort Washakie School second grader Dale Siers eats corn at lunchtime on Farm to School Day. The corn came from 1890 Farms in nearby Riverton. (Katie Klingsporn/WyoFile)

The final option would fund food services using the same general approach used to determine funding for other school resources. Under this approach, the Legislature would determine the variables used to calculate the appropriate level of funding. Under Picus Odden’s recommended assumptions, $17.1 million would be provided for food service worker staffing and $5.8 million to food service director staffing, for a total of $22.9 million.

Option three would leave 12 districts with shortfalls uncovered, Picus Odden officials said.

Public comment on the subject was divided, with some preferring the combination of options one and two, and others exclusively preferring option two because their districts contract for meals.

Brian Farmer, the executive director of the Wyoming School Boards Association, explained why there is no perfect fix for this issue.

“There is wide variability, and it’s really challenging because you can come up with something that works great for parts of the state but not necessarily others,” he said.

The committee unanimously requested a bill draft using option two, at a reimbursement rate of 30%, which equates to $17.5 million.

Technology

Judge Froelicher’s order also stated that a computer must be provided for every student, though there has been concern from local communities and parents regarding the amount of screen time students experience. Picus Odden took those concerns into account and provided eight different choices to address them.

The options ranged from the recommended 1:1 ratio for all grades to a 1:3 ratio for all grades and included options five and six, which provide no computers to students in kindergarten through second grade.

The recommendation from Picus Odden is a comprehensive estimate to provide computers at a 1:1 ratio for students and school staff at $208.95 per Average Daily Membership. Also known as ADM, this is the state’s way of calculating student enrollment. Additional operational costs for networks and learning management systems are estimated at $235 per ADM, for a total of $443.95 per ADM, leading to a $16.7 million total cost statewide. The options provided variability concerning the ratio and whether computers would be given to students in kindergarten through third grade.

Kalie Bocek, a senior at Tongue River High School, does school work on the computer. (Sheridan School District #1)

Sheridan County’s Smith noted how this funding could be best used for each district.

“I think having a tech director position in every district would help solidify how we actually operate in real life,” he said.

The committee agreed to request a bill draft with no computers for grades K-2, and a 1:1 ratio for grades 3-12, at a cost of $395 per ADM. State Sen. Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie, also asked that the bill draft include a minimum of one tech director and a part-time tech specialist for every district, based on testimony provided.

Next steps

The recalibration committee will meet Oct. 21 and 22 in Casper to continue discussions and make changes to the bill drafts as necessary.

Sen. Salazar expressed optimism about progress the committee had made, but acknowledged the primary task was ensuring compliance with the judge’s order.

“I think it’s important to go forward because I want to give the third branch of the government the understanding that we are trying to do the right thing in regard to the order,” he said.

Owen Houtakker is the state government reporter for the Wyoming Tribune Eagle.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *