Volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxide emissions from oil and gas facilities, under the right atmospheric conditions, can get baked into ozone, a serious respiratory threat. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

There are fears I hear over and over from outdoor industry leaders.

“I don’t know how to safely run my business anymore. Each season, the air gets worse, and everything I read makes me worry more about how wildfire smoke harms my staff and participants. What happens to me if I can no longer bring people into the mountains?” 

Opinion

I’ve spent most of my professional life managing risk in the wilderness. For three decades, I trained outdoor leaders to navigate hazards and respond to sudden illness or injury. But in recent years, the conversation has shifted to worries about extreme heat, super-charged weather events, old diseases in new places, and, most crucially, poor air quality. When I present on building climate resilience for the outdoor industry, I’m flooded with variations of the worries above. These are not distant hypotheticals. Wildfire smoke, heat waves and polluted air are already reshaping the outdoor industry. In a recent survey of recreation service providers, 82% reported new impacts from poor air quality compared to just three years ago. 

Many of us grew up after the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970. We take for granted blue skies and breathable air because of its landmark protections. In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that greenhouse gases are air pollutants. In 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency issued the “endangerment finding,” establishing that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. This finding is the scientific basis for emissions regulations in the U.S. It’s what requires the EPA to protect us from pollution by setting limits on emissions from cars, power plants and industry.

Now, the EPA is proposing to repeal the endangerment finding and eliminate its duty to regulate greenhouse gases. This is a direct attack on public health. It ignores decades of scientific consensus, frees the fossil fuel industry to pollute without accountability, and dismantles critical protections against worsening wildfires, smog and extreme heat.

The evidence that greenhouse gases are bad for us has only grown stronger in recent years. Air pollution has been the number one risk factor for disease worldwide for more than 20 years. In the U.S., oil and gas pollution causes more than 90,000 premature deaths each year and sickens hundreds of thousands more, with communities of color bearing the greatest burden. It contributes to over 10,000 pre-term births annually, 216,000 cases of childhood asthma and more than 1,600 cancer cases every year. Wildfire smoke, a daily stressor for outdoor workers and participants, adds another layer of harm.

For outdoor programs, this is an existential threat. Client safety, staff health and financial viability are already at risk. Will worried parents send their children to camp if they could get sick from the outdoor environment? Will outfitters take participants into the smoky backcountry? Can employers protect their staff or will they face liability for long-term exposure? Without strong protections, outdoor organizations cannot provide safe, reliable experiences, and communities across Wyoming will feel the impact. Outdoor recreation is core to Wyoming’s economy and identity, and protecting clean air protects our way of life.

During four days of testimony in August, more than 600 scientists, health professionals, lawmakers and members of the public urged the EPA not to reverse the endangerment finding. Thousands more have submitted comments. Please add your voice and let the EPA know you will not stand by while they abandon their mission to “protect human health and the environment.”

The EPA is accepting public comments on the proposed repeal until Sept. 22. 

Go to https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194 and submit your comment sharing why clean air matters to you, your family, your community and your work.

Clean air is not a luxury. It’s the foundation of Wyoming’s health, outdoor and tourism industries, and our future.

Shana Tarter is managing director of the University of Colorado School of Medicine’s Diploma in Climate Medicine and a past president of the Wilderness Medical Society. She previously served as Associate...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *