Greg Weisz outside the federal courthouse in Casper. (Angus M. Thuermer, Jr./WyoFile)

The longtime attorney for the owner of the Elk Mountain Ranch is off the corner-crossing trespass case and now works in the Wyoming Attorney General’s office.

“My switch was entirely unrelated to the corner-crossing case,” Greg Weisz said Monday. “It was a personal decision.”

After 30 years in private practice, Weisz said, he sought a change. He has been in the attorney general’s office for three weeks, he said, working in the water and natural resources division.

Megan Overmann Goetz, an attorney with Pence and MacMillan where Weisz had worked, filed Weisz’s withdrawal notice in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and now represents the firm in the ongoing civil suit.

Representing Eshelman, Weisz in 2022 sued four Missouri hunters for trespassing after they “corner crossed” to hunt on public land on Elk Mountain. The men never touched Eshelman’s Elk Mountain Ranch land as they stepped  from one section of public land to another, over a four way corner shared with two parcels of private land, in 2020 and 2021.

Eshelman and his Iron Bar Holdings company claimed that passing through airspace above the Carbon County ranch property was trespassing but lost that lawsuit last year. “Corner crossing on foot in the checkerboard pattern of land ownership without physically contacting private land and without causing damage to private property does not constitute an unlawful trespass,” Wyoming’s Chief U.S. District Judge Scott Skavdahl wrote.

Eshelman has appealed to the 10th Circuit where Weisz’s exit notice was filed last month.

The Pence and MacMillan firm Weisz worked for represented Eshelman beginning in 2005, the year the North Carolina pharma multi-millionaire formed Iron Bar Holdings LLC and bought the Elk Mountain Ranch. A real estate company that advertised the ranch said two lawsuits protect the ranch and its enclosed public property from public access like corner crossing. Judge Skavdahl rejected that assertion.

Ranch property specialist

Weisz said in 2022 that he specialized in real estate, easements and ranch property. As a witness in the separate Carbon County criminal trial of the hunters that year, he described the boundaries of Elk Mountain Ranch, said it surrounded public land and that Iron Bar “owns and controls the corners.” The jury found the men not guilty.

Weisz told the jury he had been an attorney for 27 years. He earned his law degree from the University of Wyoming in 1995 and was admitted to practice in front of the 10th Circuit.

In three separate courts over two years, Weisz filed hundreds of pages of complaints, motions, responses and pleadings for Eshelman and Iron Bar. When Skavdahl ruled against Eshelman in the civil suit against the hunters, a new law firm joined Iron Bar’s legal efforts.

On June 9 last year, Eshelman appealed his loss to the 10th Circuit as Denver attorneys Kristin Arthur and Theresa Wardon Benz joined the case. They represented Iron Bar for slightly longer than a month.

Iron Bar then signed on a new team specializing in appeals. It made Eshelman’s opening appeal arguments in November.

That team of three works for Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, which has offices in Denver, Washington, D.C. and other cities. The team includes R. Reeves Anderson who graduated from North Carolina State University as valedictorian.

Another member is Sean A. Mirski, who works in the firm’s D.C. office, clerked for Supreme Court Justice Alito and Justice Brett Kavanaugh when the latter was on the bench of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Brian Williams, a magna-cum-laude BYU alum, is the third member. He earned his law degree at Georgetown Law Center.

— Tennessee Watson contributed to this story.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Any politician that’s against public access to public land should be removed from office. That includes about all of them, including our “Representatives.”

  2. Government Gordon wants to make sure corner crossing gets fixed in Wyoming going to the favor of his rancher buddies

  3. Wow, this guy was working for Eshelman to stick it to the people and keep them off their public lands, now he works for the State of Wyoming? Are you saying that now we the people are paying this guy to stick it to us? What a poor and senseless hire

  4. What? When you “are” against the people…now suddenly working “for” the people…it doesn’t make sense. Regardless, Weisz lost big time vs. the lil’ ole Missouri 4, now he’s a state employee? Somehow, that does make sense