This wellhead is among hundreds of wells that have been drilled in the Pavillion oil and gas field in central Wyoming. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality released its final report on the Pavillion investigation Thursday, again concluding it was unlikely that hydraulic fracturing polluted nearby residential water wells in the area.

The study concluded there was no evidence that fluids from hydraulic fracturing had risen through groundwater to the level of domestic water wells. The DEQ said their investigation had also turned up no evidence of contamination from surface pits that held production water and other wastes from fracking. The final report thus supported the initial conclusions of a draft released in December 2015 – and criticized by outside researchers, residents of Pavillion and conservation groups like the Powder River Resource Basin Council.

The Environmental Protection Agency first began looking at Pavillion water wells in 2008. But the state of Wyoming took over the investigation after industry spokesmen and Gov. Matt Mead criticized as unscientific an early EPA report about groundwater contamination in the area.

The Powder River Basin Resource Council and Pavillion Area Concerned Residents responded to Thursday’s final DEQ report, saying the state of Wyoming and oil and gas company Encana continue to underplay contamination and deliberately underperform in investigations.

“The state and Encana have steadfastly refused to acknowledge that contamination from oil and gas development can be linked to polluted drinking water in the Pavillion area,” resident John Fenton said in the statement. “The data indicates that domestic water wells have been impacted by oil and gas extraction activities in the Pavillion Field and it’s past time for both the State of Wyoming and Encana to publicly acknowledge the public health consequences and do something to make us whole.”

There will be a public meeting on the report’s findings scheduled for early December, in Riverton.

The full report can be found on the DEQ’s website below:

http://deq.wyoming.gov/wqd/pavillion-investigation/resources/investigation-final-report/

For previous WyoFile reporting on Pavillion, click here.

Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *