Share this:

An effort to reform rather than eliminate the Wyoming Business Council advanced in committee Monday and is now headed to the Senate floor.

The Senate Minerals, Business and Economic Development Committee passed Senate File 125, “Wyoming business council-amendments,” on a 4-1 vote after an hour of public comment — all of it in support of the council, as well as potential reforms to the agency.

The measure is among three bills introduced last week to realign the agency — all an attempt to defuse a Freedom Caucus effort to defund and dismantle the council.

Senate File 125 directs the embattled agency to provide a full accounting of its ongoing work by April 15. It also included the formation of a task force to analyze and recommend potential reforms. But Laramie Democratic Sen. Chris Rothfuss made a successful motion to form a Minerals subcommittee to do the work instead.

“For business and economic development, this is one of the agencies that we oversee,” Rothfuss said. “In my 16 years in the Legislature, I’ve been on countless task forces and working groups, and the ones that are most effective at drafting legislation are the ones that are structured this way — a small group of legislators working with stakeholders and getting that work done.”

Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie, during the 2026 Wyomning Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Despite getting his committee colleagues on board with the shift to a subcommittee, Rothfuss was the lone vote against advancing the bill. That’s because, Rothfuss said, he’s opposed to a measure in the bill that would essentially block the agency from expanding its programs beginning in July, and to impose a “hard stop” on all Wyoming Business Council work on April 15, 2027, unless otherwise directed by the Legislature.

“I do not support pausing or restricting the Wyoming Business Council while we consider ways to improve it,” Rothfuss told WyoFile. “The programs are too valuable for our communities and our businesses.”

The committee also considered Senate File 100, “Wyoming business council-evaluation and reform-2,” but tabled the bill. It included a more expedited timeline for a review of the agency.

Still in play is House Bill 150, “Wyoming business council-evaluation and reform,” which is expected to come before the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday. It closely mirrors SF 100. 

Failing introduction last week, Senate File 65, “Wyoming business council-repeal” would have terminated the agency and repealed the Wyoming Economic Development Act that established it.

However, lawmakers still have plenty of opportunities throughout the budget session to defund the agency.

Local support

The Senate Minerals Committee heard from several Wyoming mayors — including Shoshoni Mayor Joel Highsmith and Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins — and local economic development officials about the vital role the Business Council plays.

Shoshoni received a Business Ready Community grant for a sewer line that freed up the town’s sparse dollars for another sewer line for a housing development — both critical to attracting new business, according to Highsmith. 

“[The Wyoming Business Council has] been very helpful for us and very flexible working with us on helping so we can afford to do our infrastructure and stuff that we need to keep the town alive,” Highsmith said. “We were sort of dying, but with all their help [we’re] trying to keep things going in central Wyoming.”

We were sort of dying, but with all their help [we’re] trying to keep things going in central Wyoming.

Shoshoni Mayor Joel Highsmith

It’s also vital to have the Business Council’s steady presence to pound the pavement for new businesses that otherwise wouldn’t consider Wyoming, Cheyenne Mayor Collins said. That was the case for Meta, which initially flirted with setting up shop in Cheyenne, went silent for a few years, but eventually began making huge data center investments in the community.

That would not have happened without the Business Council’s persistence, he said.

“Having certified economic development specialists available when the opportunities [arise], land and infrastructure to make development possible, willing governing bodies and a team that works at the speed of business has helped Cheyenne succeed,” Collins said.

Energy Capital Economic Development CEO Rusty Bell said the Business Council has had the same effect in northeast Wyoming. Bell’s group began serious talks with a new business developer in December, he said, for what could be a $1 billion capital investment. But in January when the Legislature’s Joint Appropriations Committee recommended defunding and disbanding the agency, the business asked, “Is Wyoming still open for business?” Bell said.

Defunding efforts remain

On the House floor Friday, Sheridan Republican Rep. Ken Pendergraft — who joined his JAC colleagues in the pre-session effort to defund and dismantle the agency — suggested the entire Wyoming Business Council staff must go. He likened the organization to a football team with a coach who has groomed all the players to conform to a “particular mentality.”

“If you leave the rest of the staff there, that mentality, that worldview, that idea of how we do things, remains,” Pendergraft said. “I had literally hours of discussions with the CEO of this [organization], and from my view, and from the view of many of the people that I work with, the programs were not the proper role of government.”

Rep. Ken Pendergraft, R-Sheridan, during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheynne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Cheyenne Republican Rep. Lee Filer said there’s been no evaluation of particular Wyoming Business Council employees or divisions. He asked Pendergraft, “But we decided to go ahead and bludgeon instead? We’re going to eliminate 44 jobs? We’re going to eliminate those people that are working for the state?”

Wheatland Republican Rep. Jeremy Haroldson said that part of the JAC’s reasoning to get rid of the Business Council was that its members asked the agency for solutions, but its leadership didn’t come up with anything specific. 

“When we say, ‘Come up with solutions that we can do, come up with something. Give us something to help you,’ and instead, we are almost given this, ‘Well, it’s the Legislature’s fault.’ Ladies and gentlemen, this is what we’re up against. This is what we’re dealing with.”

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *