The Wyoming House of Representatives on Friday failed to pass a bill to transfer federal lands to Wyoming and another bill seeking a catalog of closed routes on public federal property. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

A bill to transfer federal lands to Wyoming and another seeking a catalog of closed routes on public federal property died in the Wyoming House.

HB 142 “Transfer of Federal Lands” wasn’t brought up for vote before the 3:45 p.m. deadline today. HB 126 “Public Land Access” to catalog the closed routes failed introduction 52-7-1.

Public Lands Access would have spent $100,000 to develop an inventory of federal roads and trails that have been closed. If passed, a committee could have recommended a bill to address public access. Opponents said that route information is readily available, and that Wyoming has already spent $75,000 on a study of transferring federal lands with a final report yet to come.

“I’ve got a publication with a phone number to the forest service and they’ll tell you every road that was closed,” said Rep. Stan Blake (D-Green River). “This is a budget crunch folks.”

Co-sponsor Rep. Dan Laursen (R-Powell) offered to revisit the $100,000 appropriation in the bill before it was defeated, but to no avail.

Several public lands access advocacy groups organized their memberships to contact Wyoming legislators to express opposition to it and other public lands transfer bills. Before HB 142 expired on Friday, the Wyoming Wildlife Federation said transferring public lands to the states, “would essentially put them on the fast track for energy and mineral development.” WWF Board President Dave Moody said “Without that federal ownership and designation, the states could do what they want when it comes to how these public lands could be managed, and this means decreasing their values when it comes to wildlife, habitat and recreation.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Why did they waste our tax money on studying this? Most people in Wyoming know that the state is not who we want managing our public lands. They sell it to their buddies, they occassionally lease it excusively with a clause that allows the rancher to keep the public off of it, we can’t camp on it, we can’t have a camp fire on it…. If the state really wants to open up public land, they would have spent that money to purchase road easements for us to access our land locked land or a land locked fishing area. Thanks for the link for the petition regarding public access….why can’t the western republicans support the masses instead of the wealthy land owner who most likely can’t even vote in the state the politician represents?

    Reply