Share this:

Wyoming wildlife managers will be permitted to throw hay for at least three more winters at two disputed elk feedgrounds, one of which is the site of a chronic wasting disease epidemic that bodes ill for the future of elk populations and hunting

Bridger-Teton National Forest Supervisor Chad Hudson made the call to issue a 3-year permit for the Dell Creek and Forest Park elk feedgrounds. His decision, made in the wake of litigation, was “difficult,” “complicated” and not taken lightly, he wrote. 

“Feeding as part of winter elk management in western Wyoming is an emotive and controversial issue, and for good reason,” Hudson wrote in a July 30 decision document that accompanied a final environmental impact statement. “No alternative, with or without feedgrounds, is without tradeoffs and consequences to wildlife, resources, and people.”

The option the Bridger-Teton landed on for the 35-acre Dell Creek and 100-acre Forest Park feedgrounds will allow for continued operations through the winter of 2027-’28. After that, the national forest would again study permits for all seven feedgrounds within its 3.4 million acres, effectively delaying a long-term decision.  

This map shows the location of the Dell Creek and Forest Park feedgrounds in Sublette and Lincoln counties. (Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

One Bridger-Teton feedground, located up the Gros Ventre River drainage at Alkali Creek, has already been phased out.

Elk feeding is historic in northwestern Wyoming, having begun more than a century ago on the National Elk Refuge. Dell Creek and Forest Park are both at least 45 years old. Proponents say it’s necessary to insulate elk herds from the effects of bad winters, prop up populations and keep wapiti away from cattle. But feeding also spreads disease, contributes to the loss of migration routes and is considered an antiquated wildlife management practice that’s been abandoned elsewhere in the West.

The permit for the Dell Creek Feedground expired in 2022. The Forest Park site’s permit lapsed in 2018. Feeding since then has been authorized via one-year special use permits

Elk bed down after feeding on hay in March 2025 at the Dell Creek elk feedground near Bondurant. Six dead elk found on or adjacent to the feedground tested positive for chronic wasting disease in the winter and spring. (Ryan Dorgan/WyoFile)

The Wyoming Game and Fish Department sought a 20-year permit, a request that Hudson denied. Another option the Bridger-Teton weighed would have only allowed elk feeding on an emergency basis. A fourth avenue would have ceased all feeding immediately. In its environmental impact statement assessing the four “alternatives,” the Forest Service did not select a “preferred” option. That fell to Hudson last week.

Forest Service officials enlisted U.S. Geological Survey research biologists to help make a decision that accounted for the spread of CWD, an always lethal prion disease. In a 2023 analysis, disease experts predicted that continuing feeding would produce the worst outcomes for elk populations and elk hunting.

In the two years since that analysis, CWD was documented on the actual footprint of a few feedgrounds for the first time. It especially flared up on and near the Dell Creek Feedground, where six elk tested positive for the degenerative neurological disease, according to Hudson’s decision. 

The scavenged dead bull and cow elk pictured were discovered over the weekend of Feb. 22-23, 2025 on the Dell Creek Feedground. The bull tested positive for chronic wasting disease, while the cow is suspected to have succumbed to CWD. (Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

Because of how CWD spreads, some disease experts worry that prevalence is about to skyrocket.  

“Most of the time [prevalence] just goes straight up,” Wyoming State Wildlife Veterinarian Sam Allen told WyoFile last winter. “I would expect it in this population to go a little bit faster than in some of our other elk populations, considering how feedgrounds are set up.”

An average of 571 elk amassed at the Dell Creek Feedground’s 35 acres over recent winters, according to Game and Fish’s elk feedground management plan. In and of itself, that plan doesn’t compel any reforms, but it does call for herd-specific “Feedground Management Action Plans” that could result in major changes or even phasing out feedgrounds — although only if there’s a consensus to do so.

Even though elk feeding is continuing at the site for at least three more winters, some plaintiffs who have challenged the practice in court see Hudson’s decision as a “welcome” move. 

“It’s a step in the right direction that signals the Forest Service is beginning to take the chronic wasting disease crisis seriously,” said Dagny Signorelli, the Wyoming director for Western Watersheds Project. “Obviously, we would like to see the agencies phase out these feedgrounds immediately and permanently.”

Bridger-Teton National Forest and Wyoming Game and Fish Department officials were not able to be reached for an interview by the time this story published on Monday.

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Artificial feeding = unnaturally large congregations = increased prevalence of CWD. The jury is still out on whether consuming a CWD infected animal can lead to CJD. See: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000204407

    It would be great if WGFD could develop a rapid test for CWD so that people know before expending the money and effort to process the meat. Also have to wonder what steps commercial processors are taking to ensure that their knives and saws are not spreading the prions to uninfected meat. Not sure that’s even possible.

  2. We saw this coming a dozen years ago. Artificially congregating elk is the best way to spread disease, and there is no cure on the horizon for CWD.

    1. Rusty, in the winter elk congregate in massive numbers regardless of whether they are being fed.
      The Laramie peak herd has had known CWD cases since the 1980s. The Laramie Peak herd is also far healthier as a total population due calf survival.
      If the alarmist rhetoric were true about CWD in elk, the Laramie peak herd would have vanished long ago.

  3. What if CWD mainly affected calf elk populations.
    Then imagine that CWD was responsible for calf cow ratio at a completely unsustainable level of 15-19 calves per 100 cows causing a population to plummet.

    The problem is that this is happening, just not due to CWD but to wolves and grizzlies.

    CWD IS A BACKSEAT THREAT TO ELK POPULATIONS.

  4. I do not understand how feeding the animals has any affect on CWD. Scientists think CWD spreads through salivia, blood, and urine of a CWD infected animal. Wolves and Mountain lions do not get CWD so it would be nice for them to feed on the dead and weak CWD animals to help keep the CWD from spreading like wildfire. We must let have our scientist monitor this very closely and hope their hard work pays off with answers and solutions.

    1. Yes, a handful of cases every year doesn’t equate to an “epidemic”.

      Meanwhile GYE elk populations continue to fall off a cliff, and not a word regarding the cause.