Share this:

Once Wyoming’s far-right lawmakers sink their teeth into a national red-meat political target, they naturally thirst for more.

Opinion

That’s why it’s frustrating to see Ed Seidel, the University of Wyoming’s president until his contract expires this summer, use his lame-duck office to lament the Legislature’s Joint Appropriations Committee’s decision to cut UW’s block grant by $40 million while making cuts to Wyoming Public Media and UW Athletics.

Seidel apparently didn’t learn any lessons from the Legislature’s 2024 session, when an amendment was tacked onto the budget bill to keep UW from spending any funds on its Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion or related programming.

If he couldn’t keep the DEI office open back then, how will he defend the university from lawmakers ready to tackle what they’ve branded UW’s “woke” agenda during the budget session that convenes Feb. 9?

Perhaps the current campus community, including students, faculty and staff, as well as the massive alumni network, might be useful. What if Seidel put out the word that he needs backup in this political fight? 

No one knows the value of a UW education better than current and former students.

“It’s driven by misinformation,” Seidel said of the 2024 attack on DEI. “It’s largely driven by things happening on a national level, the kind of things we hear about are not actually happening at the University of Wyoming.”

He was right. Most legislators pushing for the closure had no idea what the office did. They looked at the title and figured it had something to do with helping transgender students or other minorities who got undeserved support for admission and hiring. Some members of the Freedom Caucus branded DEI racist.

In reality, DEI is just the opposite. It refers to policies and practices that ensure all individuals, regardless of their background, have equal opportunities for success and inclusion. It creates an environment where all individuals feel valued, heard and can contribute their unique perspectives.

When it became evident that the Freedom Caucus and its Senate allies were going after DEI funding and trying to close the office, Seidel and UW officials should have made the full Legislature aware that the masterminds behind this were totally off base. UW has saved other programs that have been under attack in recent years, including the gender studies program, which survived an attempt to abolish it during the same budget talks that defunded the DEI office. 

But without funding, UW closed the office and the hard-line Freedom Caucus got the trophy it wanted to brag about before the August GOP primary. It won enough House races in 2024 to take over the chamber the following year. 

It wasn’t done with DEI. The caucus started the 2025 legislative session with its “Five-and-Dime Plan,” which had a plank to further restrict DEI activities.

So, here we are in 2026, and the Freedom Caucus is targeting UW’s budget. In addition to the $40 million block grant reduction, the JAC cut state funding for Wyoming Public Media, $12.5 million in matching state money for fundraising and $6 million from the Athletics Department.

The caucus telegraphed its next move when the JAC’s co-chair, Rep. John Bear of Gillette, told WyoFile the budget cuts are meant to curb “an increase in administration” and “woke education” at UW. The Missouri native and University of Colorado graduate said he believes the university has turned against a “Wyoming way of life.”

Bear indicated he’s working on potential budget footnotes that target the use of state funds for particular curricula.

I’m not above reminding y’all that I saw this coming two years ago when I wrote, “UW President Ed Seidel vowed academic freedom will be protected. But when the Legislature casually guts funding of DEI and related activities, how long will it be before the Freedom Caucus insists on regulating college curricula? Why wouldn’t the university also fall in line with those demands?”

The only thing that could keep the caucus from launching a full assault on UW before the election is a loud public outcry now, especially from conservative alumni willing to speak up.

There’s still time to keep the Legislature from using the budget to demand what courses will be taught — or banned — on UW’s campus. But the Freedom Caucus wants another notch in its belt for sticking it to the university before the August primary, when it could add seats or lose its House control.

In a campus-wide email after JAC’s cuts were made, Seidel noted UW is informing legislators about the potential impacts of a reduction of this magnitude.

“We have hope that the decision-makers will recognize, as did the governor, that such a cut … would be both harmful and unnecessary, especially considering the lack of a financial crisis for state government,” Seidel wrote.

Yep, I’m sure the Freedom Caucus is quaking in its boots because UW plans to discuss its plight with other lawmakers to win them over. This bunch will do anything it can to torch classes and programs it doesn’t like, and after its success closing the DEI office, why would it ever back down?

UW’s administration has no control over the situation. The caucus has a veto-proof majority in the House and isn’t afraid of the governor.

The only thing that could keep the caucus from launching a full assault on UW before the election is a loud public outcry now, especially from conservative alumni willing to speak up.

Seidel isn’t helping when he says lawmakers have legitimate concerns, such as “whether or not universities across the country have liberal environments, and therefore conservative voices are suppressed.”

Mr. President, I can assure you that conservative voices aren’t suppressed in Wyoming, and in fact dominate almost every issue at the Legislature. There’s no need to be sympathetic or provide more ammunition to their cause; they already have your campus surrounded.

It’s time to call on students, faculty, staff and alumni to get organized for the upcoming legislative session and the next election.

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *