After most of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus’ top legislative goals failed this year, Rep. Rachel Williams, who heads the hard-line conservative group, told reporters they needed “reinforcements in Cheyenne.” On Tuesday, the caucus failed to reach that goal, instead losing majority control in the House and backsliding in the Senate. 

The caucus, which officially formed in 2020, won majority control of the House for the first time in 2024. But when most of its top legislative goals fizzled in the 2026 budget session, the group’s leadership blamed the failure on lacking a supermajority in the House and insufficient support in the Senate

But voters soundly rejected the caucus’ candidates during Tuesday’s primary.

Freedom Caucus-aligned lawmakers failed to wrest control of the state Senate from traditionalist Republicans, instead losing six caucus-aligned lawmakers — Reps. Chip Neiman, Ken Pendergraft, Daniel Singh, Ben Hornok and Paul Hoeft and Sen. Bob Ide — in Senate races. Neiman served as the House speaker in 2025 and 2026. 

That means the Senate will likely have just five reliable Freedom Caucus votes from Sens. Cheri Steinmetz, Laura Pearson, Tim French and Troy McKeown and Rep. Abby Angelos. Pearson and French weren’t up for reelection this year. The other candidates will be uncontested in the general election. A number of other lawmakers who weren’t up for reelection this year — Sens. Brian Boner, John Kolb, Tim Salazar and Charles Scott — often vote with the Freedom Caucus, though sometimes deviate from its priorities. 

Meanwhile, in the House, the caucus lost 13 incumbents — Reps. John Bear, Joe Webb, Steve Johnson, Tony Locke, Jayme Lien, Gary Brown, Ann Lucas, Ocean Andrew, Darin McCann, Robert Wharff, Marlene Brady, Scott Heiner and Nina Webber. Bear formerly chaired the Wyoming Freedom Caucus and has served in the Legislature since 2021, and Heiner was the majority floor leader in 2025 and 2026. 

The group also lost nine other seats after new Freedom Caucus-aligned candidates were unsuccessful in their primary races in districts now occupied by caucus-aligned lawmakers. It failed to win any new seats in the House. 

The caucus will likely have 10 reliable votes in the House come January, with two more possible lawmakers that often vote in line with the group. It had a consistent majority in the most recent legislative session. 

These numbers mean that the caucus has likely lost the power to obstruct two-thirds introductory votes required to introduce legislation in budget sessions. 

A number of Freedom Caucus-aligned lawmakers decided to leave their seats in the Legislature to run for state executive offices. Williams, the caucus chair, lost her race for secretary of state to Republican Robert Short. Rep. Scott Smith failed in his bid for state treasurer. And Rep. Tom Kelly, who is not a member but often votes with the group, came in second for state superintendent of public instruction. Non-Freedom Caucus candidates won in all of their districts. 

Caucus setbacks

After gaining majority control of the House in 2024, the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, an outgrowth of the Freedom Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives, faced a series of controversies and challenges. 

Last session, several Freedom Caucus allies, including Neiman, Bear and others who lost their races Tuesday, became embroiled in controversy after Teton County activist Rebecca Bextel handed out checks to caucus-aligned lawmakers on the House floor. In the run-up to Tuesday’s primaries, campaign mailers targeting Freedom Caucus candidates referenced this incident. One depicted Bextel as a puppeteer controlling candidates. 

Rebecca Bextel and Rep. Darin McCann, R-Rock Springs, during the first meeting of the House Special Investigative Committee on Feb. 26, 2026, at the Wyoming Capitol in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata for WyoFile)

In the same session, the caucus faced an uphill battle when it attempted to slash funding for the University of Wyoming, the state’s lone four-year school, and other state institutions like the Wyoming Business Council. The group ultimately relented and agreed to mostly restore funding to Gov. Mark Gordon’s recommended amounts.

Seventeen of the Senate’s 31 districts were on the ballot this year. To gain a majority in the upper chamber, the Wyoming Freedom Caucus needed to win at least 14 of those races to bolster the two senators it endorsed in 2024 — French and Pearson. 

To keep a simple majority in the House, the caucus and its allies needed to win at least 32 legislative races. However, the caucus had higher aspirations and said it would seek a supermajority in the House — a powerful voting bloc big enough to overcome the two-thirds vote required to successfully introduce bills during a budget session. To do so, it needed to win at least 42 races. 

Since the last election, the caucus has come to depend on a majority in the House via members and allies. Going into Tuesday, that voting bloc had already shrunk by one after Rep. Joel Guggenmos, a caucus ally, did not file for reelection in May, citing his disqualification for temporarily living outside his Fremont County district. 

A few days before 2024’s primary election, the Freedom Caucus endorsed a slate of 43 House candidates and four Senate candidates. In the same announcement, the caucus endorsed Donald Trump for president and Harriet Hageman for Congress. 

No such endorsement slate was released this year, though two legislative candidates announced on social media that they’ve been given such endorsements, including Lyman’s Rep. Joe Webb and Karen Weber, who ran as a Republican for House District 5. 

Some Republican primary victors — 14 in the House and three in the Senate — will face Democratic opponents in November’s general elections. 

WyoFile reporter Maggie Mullen contributed to this story.

Maya Shimizu Harris covers public safety for WyoFile. She was previously a freelance writer and the state politics reporter for the Casper Star-Tribune.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The FC not putting out public endorsements this year speaks volumes. The brand is as toxic as the product