After working to overturn President Donald Trump’s 2020 election defeat, Cleta Mitchell, a conservative attorney and former Oklahoma state lawmaker, began building a national movement aimed at remaking American elections. 

Mitchell — who was on the phone call with Trump when he pressed Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” enough votes to recalculate the results in his favor — launched the Election Integrity Network in 2021. 

The network works as a coalition of activists, attorneys, Republican party officials, advocacy groups and right-wing media outlets. Mitchell has also provided assistance to Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray. 

Under Mitchell’s leadership, the network has wielded its influence to change state laws, purge voter rolls and cast doubt on election security. In an extensive profile published in October, ProPublica reported that “no one besides Trump himself has done more than Mitchell, 76, to turn the mundane processes of how ballots are cast and counted in American elections into mortal combat.” 

While Mitchell has kept a direct line to Trump, she’s also worked closely with Gray, according to text and email records obtained by American Oversight through a public records request. American Oversight, a public interest watchdog based in Washington, D.C. shared those records with WyoFile. 

The records indicate Mitchell recommended Gray as a witness before the U.S. House Administration Committee, suggested edits to his congressional testimony, and asked Gray to press Wyoming’s federal delegation and other GOP secretaries of state to support the SAVE Act. The federal legislation, which ultimately stalled in August in the Republican-controlled Senate, would have required voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship to register and expanded the federal government’s involvement in election matters traditionally left to the states. 

“Huge win Cleta!” Gray texted Mitchell on July 1, 2025, records show, alongside a Facebook video of him discussing several election-related laws going into effect that day in Wyoming, as well as his signing of an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security to use the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database.

“Thanks for all your help and support Cleta – – it means a great deal!” Gray wrote in the same text. 

Secretary of State Chuck Gray listens to testimony at the House Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee on Jan. 15, 2025. (Mike Vanata for WyoFile)

While Gray collaborating with Mitchell is not necessarily surprising given his focus as secretary of state, the records lay bare the enthusiasm of Wyoming’s chief elections officer to work closely with one of the country’s most powerful pushers of the false claim that U.S. elections are rigged and stolen. 

In 2022, Gray, then a state lawmaker, ran for the position of chief elections officer on a platform of unverified claims of “tremendous problems” with Wyoming’s elections. As part of his campaign, Gray sponsored showings across the state of the debunked film “2,000 Mules,” which alleged that rampant “ballot harvesting” in swing states stole the 2020 election from Trump. (The nonprofit whose claims the film was based on later acknowledged in a court filing that it had no evidence to back its claims in the film.)

After voters elected him to the position, Gray ardently lobbied state lawmakers for a slate of election restrictions and racked up legislative wins that included a bill similar to the SAVE Act that added proof of both citizenship and state residency to Wyoming’s voter registration process. In 2025, he made Wyoming the first state to cooperate with the federal government’s demand that states hand over sensitive voter data. 

“Wyomingites deserve to know why Cleta Mitchell, who helped try to overturn the 2020 election, has so much access to their chief elections officer,” American Oversight Executive Director Chioma Chukwu told WyoFile in a statement. 

“These records show her working behind the scenes to shape his congressional testimony and enlist him to advance her national network’s agenda,” Chukwu said. “What does that agenda have to do with the needs of Wyoming voters? What else is Gray getting out of this relationship, and how does it benefit the people he serves? How has any of this made it easier for eligible voters to cast a ballot? Gray owes Wyomingites answers.”

In response to an emailed list of detailed questions from WyoFile, Gray responded with a statement.

“My tenure as a legislator and as Secretary of State has been one of collaboration, and I have worked with numerous individuals to advance meaningful election integrity legislation at the state and federal level. Our administration has been very successful in working for the people of Wyoming to strengthen the integrity of our elections,” Gray wrote in the statement. “The media’s obsession with attacking citizens like Cleta Mitchell who are advancing common sense election integrity measures shows how out of touch the media is. I will keep advocating for common sense election integrity measures, because the people of Wyoming support these common sense election integrity measures.”

Earlier this month, voters elected Gray to Wyoming’s lone congressional seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. He takes office in January.

Video calls

Records show that Mitchell responded to Gray’s Feb. 1, 2025 message regarding Wyoming’s newly enacted proof-of-citizenship election law and his agreement with DHS later that day.

“That’s just fabulous!!!” Mitchell wrote. “You have to talk about this on the Friday call this week!!! Woo hoo!!” Mitchell wrote. “Can you do that?” 

“Yes absolutely!” Gray said. 

This video recreation was made using screenshots of text messages between Cleta Mitchell and Chuck Gray, but is not a screen recording of the actual conversation. (WyoFile)

Since its inception, a hallmark of Mitchell’s Election Integrity Network has involved weekly videoconference meetings with participants from across the country. 

After obtaining recordings of more than 400 of those meetings, the New York Times reported in 2024 that the coordinated calls “allowed debunked theories to jump from state to state” and “nurtured a cast of amateur election sleuths and armchair experts who often see evidence of election fraud in processes that they misinterpret.”

Records show that on Oct.7, 2025, Mitchell texted Gray and asked if he could join another Friday call to discuss running Wyoming’s voter rolls “through the updated SAVE system at DHS?” 

“I’ve got you on the agenda for Friday to talk about the SAVE system / process and what your experience has been. Can you still do that? 15 minutes?” Mitchell wrote in a later message. 

“Yep!” Gray responded. 

Congressional testimony and delegation

Gray testified to the U.S. Committee on House Administration during a February hearing titled “Make Elections Great Again: How to Restore Trust and Integrity in Federal Elections.” 

Sometime in the days ahead of the hearing, records show that Gray texted Mitchell with a favor. 

“I’m testifying on Tuesday in House Admin on the MEGA Act! Really excited about it – – thank you for all of your help! Can I send you testimony – – just wanted to see any suggestions you have?” Gray wrote. 

“Yes of course. I suggested they ask you” Mitchell responded. “I’d be happy to go over your testimony. Plus I have one key paragraph I want to suggest.”

In this Feb. 6, 2014, photo, Cleta Mitchell testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Mitchell, who advised former President Donald Trump in his fight to overturn the 2020 election, played a central role advising and coordinating the movement to tighten voting laws across the country. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

Email records indicate that Gray sent his testimony to Mitchell on Feb. 9, the day before the hearing. Records show that Mitchell mostly suggested slight tweaks to Gray’s testimony and asked that he add a paragraph about Wyoming being exempt from the National Voter Registration Act and how the MEGA Act would “allow states to take the actions necessary to clean voter rolls on a real time basis.”

As seen in his testimony, Gray did not adopt most of Mitchell’s edits, including the added paragraph, largely sticking instead to his original draft. 

Letters

Records show Mitchell texted Gray on Feb. 24 about a letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune from the SAVE America Act Coalition, a project of Mitchell’s Election Integrity Network. 

“Make sure Cynthia [Lummis], [John] Barrasso and Harriet [Hageman] see this letter and publicly support the talking filibuster. Particularly Barrasso,” she wrote. 

Mitchell also asked Gray to “create a similar letter to be signed from GOP Secretaries of State.”

“If you get one together, we can help get it hand-delivered to Sen Thune’s office,” Mitchel wrote. 

On March 26, Gray announced in a press release that he had sent a joint letter with Indiana Secretary of State Diego Morales to Thune, urging the Senate majority leader to “enforce the talking filibuster to ensure” the passage of the SAVE Act. 

The records do not indicate whether Gray pushed Wyoming’s federal delegation to support the bill and he did not answer that specific question in his statement to WyoFile. 

WyoFile contacted Sens. John Barrasso and Cynthia Lummis as well as Rep. Harriet Hageman to ask whether Gray had urged them to support the SAVE Act. 

“No one has ever needed to convince Harriet Hageman about the importance of requiring an ID to vote in American elections,” Tristan Justice, Hageman’s communications director, told WyoFile in a statement. 

Neither Barrasso nor Lummis responded to WyoFile’s request by publishing time.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *