Share this:

A measure to help renters and homeowners save on their monthly electric bills with plug-in solar panels died in committee this week amid safety concerns from monopoly utilities.

House Bill 146, “Affordable electricity act of 2026,” died Tuesday in the House Transportation, Highways and Military Affairs Committee for lack of a motion to move it forward. 

Rep. Liz Storer, D-Jackson, during the 2026 Wyoming Legislature budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Sponsored by Jackson Democratic Rep. Liz Storer, the bill would have clarified that small plug-in solar devices, unlike rooftop solar systems, are exempt from state-level regulations — things like city inspections and an interconnect approval from a utility.

A typical plug-in or “balcony solar” panel sold at a box store converts solar energy to household alternating current and can be plugged into a standard outlet, injecting about the same amount of electricity as a blow-dryer. Proponents estimated it could save renters or homeowners up to a couple hundred bucks a month — significant for an investment of about $300 to $2,000, compared to $10,000 or more for a rooftop solar array.

Utah passed similar legislation last year, and at least 24 other states are considering following suit, proponents noted.

“This legislation would empower renters, folks that live in prefabricated or manufactured homes and people for whom, they are homeowners of a regular stick-built home, but the math just does not work in their favor for installing a full-size home-solar system,” said Stephen Magnifico, community organizer for the Sheridan-based landowner advocacy group Powder River Basin Resource Council.

“I think it would save people a lot of money,” Patrick Lawson of Riverton told the legislative panel while video streaming from an electric vehicle. “I’m also a member of the Northern Arapaho Tribe, and I know there’s a lot of our members that would benefit a lot.”

Rising bills and little relief for customers

Though Wyoming still enjoys among the lowest electric rates in the nation, a series of rate increases have shocked customers and elected officials alike. But some recent legislative policies have added to customers’ bills.

Last year, lawmakers passed House Bill 192, “Public utilities-wildfire mitigation and liability limits,” restricting what wildfire victims can claim damages for when an electric utility sparks a blaze. Utilities argued it’s necessary to protect their essential services from billion-dollar class-action lawsuits, claiming such legal action could bankrupt a utility. Part of that bargain, however, requires utilities to increase wildfire mitigation measures — a cost that is passed on to ratepayers. 

Utilities claim the extra costs will be minimal because they already have wildfire mitigation programs and continually upgrade power systems. Critics, however, have worried that banning class action lawsuits against utilities could shift the burden of rising insurance costs to property owners.

Wyoming’s 2020 coal carbon capture mandate, intended to extend the life of coal power plants in the state, has tapped ratepayers for a collective $5 million so far, according state officials. House Bill 56, “Carbon capture mandate-repeal,” which would cancel the law, is advancing through the Legislature.

Though not in play this budget session, the Legislature has made repeated attempts to revise or squash Wyoming’s net-metering law for rooftop solar. The argument, according to proponents, is that net-metering creates an unfair cost shift to those without rooftop solar.

Net-metering requires utilities to compensate rooftop solar owners for extra electricity they pump back into the grid. Last year, some Wyoming ranchers backed a measureHouse Bill 183, “Net metering amendments” — to extend the state’s net-metering cap of 25 kilowatts. Proponents argued it would empower agricultural operations to be more self-reliant and protect ag operations from skyrocketing electricity costs.

The measure failed.

Safety concerns

Though plug-in solar devices are supposed to adhere to Underwriters Laboratory and National Electrical Code standards, utilities cannot be assured their customers won’t buy and install some knock-off product that isn’t up to snuff, several utility representatives testified to the committee.

Like a rooftop solar array, plug-in solar panels are supposed to shut off when a utility cuts power — in the case of a fire, for example. That’s for the safety of electricians who need assurances a system isn’t energized. There have been instances when that didn’t happen with rooftop solar arrays, attorney Nathan Nicholas, of Cheyenne firm Koch Law, told the panel.

A small solar panel. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Plug-in solar devices could also pose a potential hazard by “overloading” home wiring systems, said Nicholas, who spoke on behalf of client Rocky Mountain Power, the state’s largest electric utility.

If wiring is overloaded, he said, “You start overheating wires, you start subjecting the house to electrical fires and other types of injuries and damage.”

A Black Hills Energy representative shared those concerns, as did Wyoming Rural Electric Association Executive Director Shawn Taylor.

Taylor, however, noted that its members are customer-owned, nonprofit rural co-ops. Safety concerns likely are not insurmountable, he suggested. “If our members want to do something like this, we want to work with them.”

Testimony regarding safety hazards felt like a canard, Lawson told WyoFile.

“They’re afraid of linemen getting zapped or something,” Lawson said. “It’s basically not even possible. It’s pretty simple: If they don’t have power, the inverter doesn’t run, and they don’t produce power.”

Lawson reiterated that plug-in solar is a particularly viable option for low-income households to withstand rising electricity bills — especially on the Wind River Reservation. “The poverty level is pretty high, and if there was a device that could help them cut their electric bill by any amount, it would be a big deal.”

It was “weird” that there was no motion to move HB 146, Lawson added. “The power companies were the only ones that were against it, and everybody else was for it.”

For Cheyenne Republican Rep. Landon Brown, chair of the Transportation Committee, the bill’s death might be inconsequential.

“I honestly don’t think the law is needed,” Brown told WyoFile via email. “There’s no need to actually create the law because there’s nothing prohibiting the use of them. I feel like the idea of us creating a law right now to allow this actually may create more issues rather than fix something that’s not broken.”

For more legislative coverage, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *